University students’ satisfaction survey towards the usage of dynamic cultivator blade (DCB) as a replacement of conventional cultivation tools during field work course
List of Authors
  • Mohamad Zaharudin Sariman , Nur Maizatul Idayu Othman

Keyword
  • Dynamic Cultivator Blade (DCB), Agricultural Education, Student Satisfaction, Experiential Learning, Agricultural Tools

Abstract
  • Agricultural education depends heavily on efficient tools to enhance students' knowledge of farming techniques. Traditional land preparation instruments, such as hoe, are frequently inefficient and time-consuming, resulting in student discontent and delayed assignments. In response to these obstacles, the Dynamic Cultivator Blade (DCB) was developed, which streamlines soil and bed preparation by simplifying weeding and ploughing tasks. The purpose of this study was to evaluate student satisfaction with the DCB as a replacement for conventional instruments in fieldwork courses. The DCB was demonstrated to first-semester diploma students enrolled in the Field Work 1 (FPA100) course. Based on previous research, 42 randomly selected students were given a questionnaire to assess their level of satisfaction. The study found that 85.7% of respondents rated the DCB as highly user-friendly, indicating its effectiveness in simplifying duties. Moreover, 85.7% of students agreed that the DCB substantially reduced weed removal time. The majority (78.6%) expressed a strong desire to use the DCB for fieldwork, demonstrating its potential to enhance the learning experience. Results indicate that innovative instruments such as the DCB can enhance student engagement, facilitate experiential learning, and ultimately contribute to the advancement of agricultural practices.

Reference
  • 1. Aini, M. S., Nurizan, Y., Fakhru’l-Razi .(2007). Environmental comprehension and participation of Malaysian secondary school students. Environmental Education Research. 13(1):17-31

    2. Andrew, F.T., Tahir, Z., Lyndom, N., Ali, M.N.S., Mat Sum, S., Mahendran, A.R. (2022). Use of modern technology and innovations to increase the productivity of oil palm smallholders, International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 9(5): 9-17.

    3. Ang, L. and Seng, J. K. P. (2021). Big data and machine learning with hyperspectral information in agriculture. IEEE Access, 9, 36699-36718. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3051196

    4. Bradford, T., Hock, G., Greenhaw, L. L., & Kingery, W. L. (2019). Comparing experiential learning techniques and direct instruction on student knowledge of agriculture in private school students. Journal of Agricultural Education, 60(3), 80-96. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2019.03080

    5. Choudhary, A. K. and Suri, V. K. (2018). System of rice intensification in promising rice hybrids in north-western himalayas: crop and water productivity, quality, and economic profitability. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 41(8), 1020-1034. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2018.1431675

    6. Gozalbo, M. E., Truchero, G. R., & Suárez-López, R. (2021). University gardens for sustainable citizenship: assessing the impacts of garden-based learning on environmental and food education at spanish higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 22(3), 516-534. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-06-2020-0208.

    7. Harris, A. L., Lang, M., Yates, D., & Kruck, S. E. (2008). Incorporating Ethics and Social Responsibility in IS Education. Journal of Information Systems Education, 22(3), 183-189.

    8. Harun, R., Hock, L.K., Othman, F. (2011). Environmental Knowledge and Attitude among Students in Sabah. World Applied Sciences Journal. 14: 83-87

    9. Laishram, C., Vashishat, R. K., Sharma, S., Rajkumari, B., Barwal, P., Vaidya, M. K., & Sharma, N. (2022). Impact of natural farming cropping system on rural households—evidence from solan district of himachal pradesh, india. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.878015

    10. Lee M. K. O., Cheung C. M. K., Chen Z. (2005). Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: The role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & Management, 42 (8), 1095–1104.

    11. OECD (2016), Innovating Education and Educating for Innovation: The Power of Digital Technologies, and Skills, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/ 9789264265097-en

    12. Othman, N.M.I, Shamsuddin, A.S., Abdullah, F. A., Abusari, N. (2023) Time Spent on Soil Science Topics and Its Influence on Students' Environmental Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society. ASN Scholar Network. 5-3. 361-369.

    13. Sánchez-Franco M. J., Martínez-López F. J., Martín-Velicia F. A. (2009). Exploring the impact of individualism and uncertainty avoidance in Web-based electronic learning: An empirical analysis in European higher education. Computers & Education, 52 (3), 588–598.

    14. Tung F. C., Chang S. C. (2008). Nursing students’ behavioral intention to use online courses: A questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45 (9), 1299–1309.