1. Babbie, E. 2008. The Basics of Social Research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
2. Baber, K. & Tucker, C. 2006. The Social Roles Questionnaire: A new approach to measuring attitudes toward gender. Sex Roles 54: 459-467.
3. Berry, P. 2013. The impact of globalization and technology on teaching business communication: Reframing and enlarging world view, methods, and content. American Journal of Business Education 6(1): 57-66.
4. Colley, A. & Comber, C. 2003. Age and gender differences in computer use and attitudes among secondary school students: What has changed? Educational Research 45(2): 155-165.
5. Cooper, J. 2006. The digital divide: The special case of gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 22(5): 320-334.
6. Cooper, J. & Weaver, K.D. 2003. Gender and Computers: Understanding the digital divide. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
7. Dyck, J.L. & Smither, J.A. 1994. Age differences in computer anxiety: the role of computer experience, gender and education. Educational Computing Research 10: 33-39.
8. Fallows, D. 2005. How women and men use the Internet. Pew Internet & American Life Project. http://www.pewInternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Women_and_Men_online.pdf [28 Mac 2013].
9. Fox, S., & Duggan, M. 2013. Health Online 2013. Health. www.pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/PIP_HealthOnline.pdf. [2013 Mac 20].
10. Heinssen, R.K., Glass, C.R., & Knight, L.A. 1987. Assessing computer anxiety: development and validation of the computer anxiety rating scale. Computers in Human Behaviour 3: 49- 59.
11. Hong, K.S., Abang, A.R., & Kuek, M.K. 2003. Students' attitudes toward the use of the Internet for learning. Educational Technology & Society 6(2). http://ifets.ieee.org/periodical/6- 2/5.html. [10 Januari 2013].
12. Hong K.S., Abang A.O., & Nordin, Z.S. 2005. Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, and attitudes toward the Internet: A study among undergraduates in Unimas. Journal of Educational Technology and Society 8: 205-211.
13. Iskandarani, M. 2008. Effect of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) on NonIndustrial Countries-Digital Divide Model, Journal of Computer Science 4(4): 315-319.
14. Israel, G. D. (1992). Determining sample size. University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agriculture Sciences, EDIS.
15. Jackson, L.A., Ervin, K.S., Gardner, P.D. & Schmitt, N. 2001. Gender and the Internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles 44: 363–379.
16. Jones, S., Johnson-Yale, C., Millermaier, S., Perez, F.S. 2009. US college students’ internet use: Race, gender and digital divides. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14 (2): 244–264.
17. McMillan, S.J., & Morrison, M. 2006. Coming of age with the internet: A qualitative exploration of how the internet has become an integral part of young people's lives. New Media and Society 8: 73-95.
18. Madden, M., & Zickhur, K. 2011. 65% of online adults use social networking sites: Women maintain their foothold on SNS use and older Americans are still coming aboard. Pew Internet & American Life Project. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Social-NetworkingSites.aspx [20 Februari 2013].
19. Munusamy, K., & Ismail, M. 2009. Influence of gender role on internet usage pattern at home among academicians. The Journal of International Social Research 2(9): 308-318.
20. Odell, P.M., Korgen, K.O., Schumacher, P., Delucchi, M. 2000. Internet use among female and male college students. CyberPsychology & Behavior 3(5): 855–862.
21. Selwyn, N. 2004. Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society 6(3): 341-362.
22. Servon, L.J. 2002. Bridging the Digital Divide Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
23. Wong, S.L., Sidek A.A., Mohd Yunus, A.S., Sidek, Z., Abu Bakar, K., Meseran, H., & Atan, H. 2008. Gender differences in ICT competencies among academicians at Universiti Putra Malaysia. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology (MOJIT) 2(3): 62-69.