1. Ali, S. S. (2019). Problem based learning: A student-centered approach. English Language Teaching, 12(5), 73. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n5p73
2. Blonder, R., & Mamlok‐Naaman, R. (2019). Factors affecting the study of Chemistry in different countries around the world: Findings from an international survey. Israel Journal of Chemistry, 59(6–7), 625– 634. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201800100
3. Bradford, J., Mowder, D., & Bohte, J. (2016). You can lead students to water, but you can’t make them think: An assessment of student engagement and learning through student-centered teaching. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(4), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i4.20106
4. Dahsah, C., & Wannagatesiri, T. (2010). Quantitative Chemistry teaching and learning at the high school level: A case study in Thailand. The International Journal of Learning: Annual Review, 17(9), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/cgp/v17i09/47226
5. Gilis, A., Clement, M., Laga, L., & Pauwels, P. (2008). Establishing a competence profile for the role of student-centred teachers in higher education in Belgium. Research in Higher Education, 49(6), 531– 554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-008-9086-7
6. Göksu, V., & İnaltekin, T. (2019). The analysis of student- and teacher-centered pedagogic processes in science classes using student notebooks. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(4), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2019.04.017
7. Hofstein, A., Nahum, T. L., & Shore, R. (2001). Assessment of the learning environment of inquiry-type laboratories in high school Chemistry. Learning Environments Research, 4(2), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1012467417645
8. Ibrahim, M., & Jamaludin, K. A. (2019). The roles of teacher and students via blended problem-based learning: Improving students’ mastery of three representation levels of Chemistry. EDUCATUM, 6(2), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.37134/ejsmt.vol6.2.2.2019
9. Juuti, K., Lavonen, J., Uitto, A., Byman, R., & Meisalo, V. (2009). Science teaching methods preferred by grade 9 students in Finland. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(4), 611– 632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9177-8
10. Kara, N. (2021). A systematic review of the use of serious games in science education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(2), ep295. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/9608
11. Kasim, T. S. a. B. T. (2014). Teaching paradigms: An analysis of traditional and student-centred approaches. Jurnal Usuluddin, 40(40), 199–218. https://ijie.um.edu.my/index.php/JUD/article/view/7492
12. Malie, S., & Akir, O. (2012). Bridging the gaps between learning and teaching through recognition of students’ learning approaches: A case study. Research in Education, 87(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.7227/rie.87.1.6
13. Manager, S. (2019, January 3). 21st Century Learning Teachers Campaign launch - PADU. PADU. https://www.padu.edu.my/events/21st-century-learning-teachers-campaign-launch/
14. Nzeyimana, J. C., & Ndihokubwayo, K. (2019). Teachers’ role and learners’ responsibility in teaching and learning science and elementary technology in Rwanda. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 15(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajesms.v15i2.1
15. Polly, D., Margerison, A., & Piel, J. A. (2013). Kindergarten teachers’ orientations to teacher-centered and student-centered pedagogies and their influence on their students’ understanding of addition. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 28(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2013.822949
16. Suaalii, F., & Bhattacharya, M. (2007). Conceptual model of learning to improve understanding of high school Chemistry. The Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 18(1), 101–110. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/21911/article_21911.pdf
17. Tasir, Z., Noor, N. M., Harun, J., & Ismail, N. I. (2008). A survey on online teaching preference among pre- service teachers in Malaysia: Andragogy vs pedagogy. Proceedings Ascilite Melbourne 2008. http://www.ascilite.org/conferences/melbourne08/procs/tasir.pdf
18. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (2004). Development and use of the approaches to teaching inventory. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0007-9
19. Wu, H. K., & Huang, Y. (2007). Ninth-grade student engagement in teacher-centered and student-centered technology-enhanced learning environments. Science Education, 91(5), 727–749. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20216
20. Wulf, C. (2019). “From teaching to learning”: Characteristics and challenges of a student-centered learning Culture. In Springer eBooks (pp. 47–55). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14223-0_5
21. Yunus, H. M., Ismail, Z., & Raper, G. (2004). Malaysian primary teachers’ classroom practice of teaching and learning science. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 27(1), 166–203. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ854265
22. Zhang, W., & Birdsall, S. (2016). Analysing early childhood educators’ science pedagogy through the lens of a pedagogical content knowing framework. Australian Journal of Early Childhood. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911604100208
23. Σάλτα, Κ., & Tzougraki, C. (2004). Attitudes toward chemistry among 11th grade students in high schools in Greece. Science Education, 88(4), 535–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10134