Understanding energy conservation behavior among university employees from a TPB theory perspective: A pilot study analysis
List of Authors
  • Aidil Syukri Shaari , Mohd Sofian Rosbi

Keyword
  • Energy Conservation Behavior, Sustainable Development Goal, University, Theory Of Planned Behavior, Occupant Behavior

Abstract
  • Occupant behavior directly Influences how energy is consumed through engagement with organizational setting, such as lighting, thermostats, windows, and appliances. Therefore, it is essential to understand the factors that influence energy conservation behavior among university staff. This research focuses on investigating the effects of energy conservation behavior within the university, based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. The questionnaires were gathered from a sample of 100 academic staff members from Malaysian public universities ranging in age from 21 to 60 years old. The results shows that the skewness value for all variables statistically significance between -1 and +1. The Cronbach's alpha value in the internal reliability statistical test exceeds 0.7 for all variables. The values of the Kaiser- Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure and Bartlett's test are greater than 0.5 and p-value of Bartlett's Test is below 0.05 for all variables, which is the significance and reliable for factor analysis. The findings of this study support the hypothesis and offer valuable insights for university administrators and policymakers. allowing them to encourage universities to adopt energy conservation behavior to achieve sustainable development goals.

Reference
  • 1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    2. Akbar, Y. K., Ariana, S., Setyadi, A., Pawirosumarto, S., & Endri Endri. (2024). “Human capital and sustainable university: Mediating role of sustainable human resource management in Indonesia.” Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(1), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(1).2024.16

    3. Altawalbeh, M., & Al-Mughrabi, A. M. (2024). Using the TPB model to determine factors affecting e-learning adoption in Jordanian higher education. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 7(2), 627–637.

    4. Bavaresco, M. V, D’Oca, S., Ghisi, E., & Pisello, A. L. (2020). Assessing underlying effects on the choices of adaptive behaviours in offices through an interdisciplinary framework. Building and Environment, 181, 107086.

    5. Duong, C. D. (2024). Using a unified model of TPB, NAM and SOBC to understand students’ energy-saving behaviors: moderation role of group-level factors and media publicity. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 18(1), 71–93.

    6. Durmus Senyapar, H. N., Duzgun, B., & Boran, F. E. (2024). Energy Labels and Consumer Attitudes: A Study among University Staff. Sustainability (Switzerland) , 16(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16051754

    7. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., & Belief, A. (1975). Intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    8. Gao, L., Wang, S., Li, J., & Li, H. (2017). Application of the extended theory of planned behavior to understand individual’s energy saving behavior in workplaces. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 107–113.

    9. Goes, S., Hasterok, D., Schutt, D. L., & Klöcking, M. (2020). Continental lithospheric temperatures: A review. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 306, 106509.

    10. Hussein, L., Ateeq, A., & Homod, R. (2022). Energy Saving by Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Chillers of HVAC Systems. 2006. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.7-9-2021.2315301

    11. Kaur, A., & Kaur, P. (2023). Predicting customers’ intentions to adopt the solar net metering system in India. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 17(6), 1252–1270.

    12. Ly, B., & Ly, R. (2022). Saving energy in the workplace: Evidence from Cambodia. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 15(1), 153–160.

    13. Md. Akhir, N., Wei Lun, A., Mee Yeang, C., Abd Rahman, N., & Halim, L. (2022). Establishing the value-psychological-educational dimensions for “learning to action” model for pro-environmental behaviour. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X. 2022.2156748

    14. Nekmahmud, M., Ramkissoon, H., & Fekete-Farkas, M. (2022). Green purchase and sustainable consumption: A comparative study between European and non-European tourists. Tourism Management Perspectives, 43(March), 100980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp. 2022.100980

    15. Prastika, A. W., & Trisnaningsih, S. (2023). The Influence of Attitudes, Subjective Norm, and Behavior Control on Individual Taxpayer Compliance with Moral Obligations as Moderation. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(6), 2473–2486. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v2i6.4461

    16. Rawat, A., Kumar, D., & Khati, B. S. (2024). A review on climate change impacts, models, and its consequences on different sectors: a systematic approach. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 15(1), 104–126. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2023.536

    17. Yan, D., Hong, T., Dong, B., Mahdavi, A., D’Oca, S., Gaetani, I., & Feng, X. (2017). IEA EBC Annex 66: Definition and simulation of occupant behavior in buildings. Energy and Buildings, 156, 258–270.

    18. Yuriev, A., Dahmen, M., Paillé, P., Boiral, O., & Guillaumie, L. (2020). Pro-environmental behaviors through the lens of the theory of planned behavior: A scoping review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 155, 104660.