The (Re) construction of househusband’s role in the intern film
List of Authors
  • Briandana, Rizki , Ridaryanthi, Melly

Keyword
  • Sign, meaning, househusband, film, semiotics

Abstract
  • The role of the male as breadwinner is a common construction in society. However, there are families with certain agreements with particular conditions that require the husband to stay at home with domestic roles. This condition usually addressed the husband as a househusband. This research analyzes signs identified in The Intern film (2015) that portrays the househusband which further interprets the characteristics and roles of the househusband. Roland Barthes’ semiotics method is applied in order to be able to analyse both the denotative and connotative meaning of the identified signs regarding the househusband. From the study, it is identified that there are two roles of househusbands constructed in the film 1) caregiving, and 2) act of service. Househusband duties are identified as everything domestic affairs outside of the public domain. The term househusband is not meaningfully accepted based on the preferences of men carrying out domestic duties, therefore, the term stay-at-home dad is preferred because it constructs the role of the father as a whole.

Reference
  • 1. Abdullah, I. (2003). Sangkaan peran gender. Pustaka Pelajar.
    2. Au, R., Y, Au., & Rahman, O. (2009, March). An Exploratory study of business attire: Formal or casual. International Foundation of Fashion Technology Institutes Conference.
    3. Azwar, A. S. (2021, November 12). Real work, real joy: Indonesian stay-at-home dads talk stigma and emotional rewards. The Jakarta Post. https://www.thejakartapost.com/culture/2021/11/12/real-work-real-joy-indonesian-stay-at-home-dads-talk-stigma-and-emotional-rewards.html
    4. Barthes, R. (1964). Elements of Semiology. Hill and Wang.
    5. Basarah, F. F. (2019). Feminisme dalam Webseries “Sore-Istri dari masa depan” (Analisis Wacana Sara Mills). Widyakala Journal, 6(2), 110-120. https://ojs.upj.ac.id/index.php/journal_widya/article/view/193
    6. Briandana, R., & Hajariah, S. (2013). Gender and the action film: Question of female heroism (Analysis of female masculinity of the female heroic character). Jurnal Visi Komunikasi, 12(2), 183-198. https://publikasi.mercubuana.ac.id/index.php/viskom/article/view/399
    7. Burkstrand-Reid, B. (2011). Trophy husbands & opt-out moms. College of Law, Faculty Publication, 76, 663-677. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/lawfacpub/76/
    8. Carrim, N. M. H. (2017). New men and new women: cultural identity work of husband and wives related to housework and childcare. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 13(11), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v13n11p1
    9. Cresswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
    10. Danesi, M. (2004). Pesan, tanda dan makna. (Setyarini, A. & Piantari, L. L, Trans.). Jalasutra
    11. Dianto, I. (2019). Hambatan komunikasi antar budaya (menarik diri, prasangka sosial dan etnosentrisme). Hikmah, 187. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349459087_Hambatan_Komunikasi_Antar_Budaya_Menarik_Diri_Prasangka_Sosial_dan_Etnosentrisme
    12. Djendri, D. V. (2020, October 9). Sinopsis film The Intern, ketika Robert DeNiro jadi anak magang. Kompas.com. https://www.kompas.com/hype/read/2020/10/09/100000266/sinopsis-film-the-intern-ketika-robert-deniro-jadi-anak-magang?page=all
    13. Dominicus, D. (2020, January 31). Bapak rumah tangga adalah solusi, jadi tak perlu risi. Magdalene. https://magdalene.co/story/bapak-rumah-tangga-adalah-solusi-jadi-tak-perlu-risi
    14. Eco, U. (1979). A Theory of semiotics. Indiana University Press.
    15. Fakih, M. (1996). Analisis gender & transformasi sosial. Pustaka.
    16. Fiske, J. (2016). Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi Edisi Ketiga. PT Raja Grafindo Persada
    17. Fitinline. (2020, December 7) Jenis-jenis dress code dan makna yang tersembunyi di dalamnya. Fitinline. https://fitinline.com/article/read/jenis-jenis-dress-code-dan-makna-yang-tersembunyi-didalamnya/
    18. Griffin, EM. (2003). A first look at communication theory (5th Edition). McGraw-Hill.
    19. Hermawan, A. R., & Syarief, A. (2021). Semantika produk kacamata dan hubungannya dengan pencitraan kader politik. Productum: Jurnal Desain Produk (Pengetahuan dan Perancangan Produk), 4(1), 43-52. https://journal.isi.ac.id/index.php/PRO/article/view/4053
    20. Kurnia, N. (2004). Representasi maskulinitas dalam iklan. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 8(1), 17-36. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jsp/article/view/11056
    21. Leonard, M. E. (2018, 10 November). Benarkah bapak rumah tangga adalah lelaki yang tak berguna? Mojok. https://mojok.co/mel/esai/benarkah-bapak-rumah-tangga-adalah-lelaki-yang-tak-berguna/
    22. Liliweri, A. (2018). Prasangka, konflik dan komunikasi antarbudaya. Kencana.
    23. Nurhidayah, Y., & Nurhayati, E. (2018). Psikologi komunikasi antar gender. Pustaka Belajar.
    24. Nöth, W. (1995). Handbook of semiotics. Indiana University Press.
    25. Piliang, Y. A. (2012). Semiotika dan Hipersemiotika: kode, gaya & matinya makna. Matahari.
    26. Putranto, T. D., Suyanto, B., Ariadi, S., & Santos, R. R. T. (2021). The discourse of men’s facial care products in Instagram from the Foucauldian perspective. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, 5(1), 37-57. https://ejournal.unitomo.ac.id/index.php/jsk/article/view/3159
    27. Ridaryanthi, M., & Jinguli, N. E. (2021). Semiotics analysis on gender role representations in Spider-Man: into the S pider-Verse. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society, 3(1), 34-46. https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijares/article/view/12458
    28. Ridaryanthi, M., & Sinuyul, C. J. (2021). Representation of female superhero and gender roles in the Avengers: Endgame. Komunika: Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi, 15(2), 139-154. https://doi.org/10.24090/komunika.v15i2.4580
    29. Rohman, A. (2013). The changed and unchanged situations in the representation of women in contemporary cinema. Humaniora, 25(2), 175-183. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2304663
    30. Sobur, A. (2004). Analisis teks media: Suatu pengantar untuk analisis wacana, analisis semiotik, dan analisis framing. Remaja Rosdakarya.
    31. Trisnawati, R. K., Adiarti, D., & Agustina, M. F. (2021). Gender stereotypes in Nancy Meyer’s “The Intern” (2015): A Study of Film Audience Response. EduLite: Journal of English Education, Literature, and Culture, 6(1), 147-164. http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/edulite/article/view/11234
    32. Wahid, U., & Lancia, F. (2018). Pertukaran peran domestik dan publik menurut perspektif wacana sosial halliday. Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi, 11(1), 106-118. https://ejournal.unisba.ac.id/index.php/mediator/article/view/3180
    33. Wentworth, D. K. (2001). The role of househusband and housewife as perceived by a college population. The Journal of Psychology Interdisciplinary and Applied, 135(6), 639-650. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980109603725
    34. Wibowo, A. S., Hadi, I. P., & Wijayanti, C. A. (2018). Representasi feminisme dalam film “The Intern”. Jurnal E-Komunikasi, 6(2), 1 – 11. https://publication.petra.ac.id/index.php/ilmu-komunikasi/article/view/8266
    35. Wood, J. T. (1994). From gendered lives: Communication, gender, and culture. Wadsworth Publishing.