Project selection and identification in optimizing the utilization of funds process from company right issues: A case study of PT. West Java Cement Indonesia
List of Authors
  • Adhi Priyo Dwiarso , Sylviana Maya Damayanti

Keyword
  • Project Selection, Alternative Fuels, Financial Project Analysis, Weighted Average Scoring

Abstract
  • PT. West Java Cement Indonesia is a public company in Indonesia which has challenges in facing free-float issues. PT. West Java Cement Indonesia conducted a right issue and aimed around 1 trillion IDR and allocated 55 billion IDR to invest in alternative fuel projects. PT. West Java Cement Indonesia aims for 25% TSR (Thermal Substitution Rate) by 2030. Three Alternative Projects are identified, which are: RDF (Reuse Derived Fuels), Waste Tire Pyrolysis Oils, and Biochar. The method that use on this research are financial project analysis method, involving five indicators, which are: NPV (Net Present Value), IRR (Internal Rate of Return), Payback Period (PBP), ROI (Return on Investment), and Opportunity Cost and weighted average scoring method. Based on the calculation of financial project analysis, it is shown that the Waste Tire Pyrolysis Project is the most beneficial among the others. It is indicated by highest NPV around 52,160 million IDR among the others. Weighted Average Result also shows a similar figure with the highest score around 10.0 among the others. The result concludes that the Waste Tire Pyrolysis Project is the best use among the others.

Reference
  • 1. Sinaga, H. (2024). Sahamnya Masuk Dalam Pemantauan Khusus, PT Solusi Bangun Indonesia Tbk (SMCB) Ternyata Berencana Melakukan "Rights Issue". Retrieved July 24, 2024, from https://www.tvonenews.com/ekonomi/230094-sahamnya-masuk-dalam-

    2. Suherman Yahya, B. S. (2024). Financial Feasibility Analysis Of Urban Waste Processing As Refused Derived Fuel For Cement Company. Journal of Universal Studies, 4(6), 5353-5366.

    3. Abascal, E. M. (2010). Finance for Managers (1st ed.). Middle East: McGraw Hill.

    4. George, T. & Friedlob, F. J. (1996). Understanding Return on Investment (1st ed.). Singapore: John wiley and Sons.

    5. Gitman, L. J. (2009). Principle of Managerial Finance (10th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.

    6. Guohao Zhang, F. C. (2021). Properties and utilization of waste tire pyrolysis oil: A mini review. Fuel Processing Technology, 211.

    7. Mankiw, N. G. (2024). Principles of Economics (10th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.

    8. Mengshan Lee, Y.-L. L. (2020). Environmental and energy assessment of biomass residues to biochar as fuel: A brief review with recommendations for future bioenergy systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 251.

    9. Dicky Hermawan Sukarjo, F. P. (2024). Analisis Kelayakan Investasi Pada Proyek Perumahan Mahardika Residence Sesuai Analisis Biaya Dan Analisis Permintaan. Seminar Nasional Rekayasa, Sains dan Teknologi, 2(1), 11-20.

    10. Sekar Wahyuliningtyas, N. R. (2023). Implementasi Differential Cost dan Opportunity Cost Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Membuat Sendiri atau Membeli. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Keuangan , 2(2), 152 - 163.

    11. Muhammet Deveci, U. C. (2021). Evaluation of criteria for site selection of solar photovoltaic (PV) projects using fuzzy logarithmic additive estimation of weight coefficients. EnergyReports, 7(11), 8805-8824.

    12. Weller, J. (2021). Everything You Need to Know about Scoring Models in Project Management. Retrieved September 23, 2024, from https://www.smartsheet.com/ content/project-scoring

    13. Muhammad Ishlahush Shirod Aditya, E. C. (2020). Analysis of Selecting Alternative Investment CDC Devices in PT. Indonesia Telecommunication Infrastructure in Regions Which Electrically Load. e-Proceeding of Engineering, 7(2), 5219-5232.