Design principles for integrating mobile applications to enhance teaching presence: Based on the survey of the problems in English learning in Chinese universities
List of Authors
  • Nurhasmiza Sazalli , Xiaoyu Wang

Keyword
  • blended learning; mobile applications; teaching presence; Community of Inquiry

Abstract
  • With the widespread use of information technology in higher education, blended learning combining face-to-face instruction and online learning has now become the mainstream of language learning in Chinese universities. This paper reports the provisional findings of an ongoing research that aims to produce design principles for integrating mobile apps in blended learning courses that enhance teaching presence for the teaching of English as a Foreign Language in a Chinese University. The survey conducted in this paper sought the responses of 3101 student participants from a Chinese higher education institution and 32 Chinese EFL teachers from different universities on their best and worst experiences of blended learning course and their feedback on how blended learning courses that utilize mobile apps should be improved to enhance teaching presence. The findings of the study indicate the importance of comprehensive instructor guidance and the pedagogical skills of instructors to suit learners’ proficiency levels. The use of suitable mobile apps in a blended learning environment enhances the teaching presence and creates an engaging learning atmosphere. The future research stage will test the design framework found in this intervention involving other groups of participants.

Reference
  • 1. Singh, H., & Reed, C. (2001). A white paper: Achieving success with blended learning. Centra software, 1, 1-11.

    2. Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., Archer, W., & Rourke, L. (2000). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts.

    3. Holbeck, R., & Hartman, J. (2018). Efficient strategies for maximizing online student satisfaction: Applying technologies to increase cognitive presence, social Presence, and teaching Presence. Journal of Educators Online, 15(3), n3.

    4. Kucuk, S., & Richardson, J. (2019). A structural equation model of predictors of online learners' engagement and satisfaction. Online Learning, 23(2).

    5. Lightner, C. A., & Lightner-Laws, C. A. (2016). A blended model: Simultaneously teaching a quantitative course traditionally, online, and remotely. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 224-238.

    6. Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701.

    7. Klímová, B., & Pražák, P. (2019, July). Mobile blended learning and evaluation of its effectiveness on students’ learning achievement. In International Conference on Blended Learning (pp. 216-224). Springer, Cham.

    8. Klubal, L., Kostolanyova, K., & Gybas, V. (2017). Using Tablet and iTunesU as Individualized Instruction Tools. International Association for Development of the Information Society.

    9. Manuel, P. M., Pilar, A. M., Dolores, R. M. M., Dorado, M. P., Sara, P., & Pilar, M. J. M. (2019). Characterization of biodiesel using virtual laboratories integrating social networks and web app following a ubiquitous-and blended-learning. Journal of cleaner production, 215, 399-409.

    10. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of distance education, 15(1), 7-23.

    11. Martin, F., Wang, C., & Sadaf, A. (2018). Student perception of helpfulness of facilitation strategies that enhance instructor presence, connectedness, engagement and learning in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 52-65.

    12. Ruarte, D. E. (2019). Effective pedagogies for online teaching and learning.

    13. Kucuk, S., & Richardson, J. (2019). A structural equation model of predictors of online learners' engagement and satisfaction. Online Learning, 23(2).

    14. Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational technology research and development, 53(4), 5-23.

    15. Ladyshewsky, R. (2013). Instructor presence in online courses and student satisfaction. The International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 1-23.

    16. Glahn, C., Gruber, M. R., & Tartakovski, O. (2015). Beyond delivery modes and apps: a case study on mobile blended learning in higher education. In Design for Teaching and Learning in a Networked World: 10th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2015, Toledo, Spain, September 15-18, 2015, Proceedings 10 (pp. 127-140). Springer International Publishing

    17. Borba, M. C., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S., & Aguilar, M. S. (2016). Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education. ZDM, 48, 589-610.

    18. Suartama, I. K., Setyosari, P., Sulthoni, S., & Ulfa, S. (2019). Development of an instructional design model for mobile blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online), 14(16), 4.

    19. Ustun, A. B. (2019). Effects of mobile learning in blended learning environments. Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 1(1), 1-14.

    20. Hwang, G. J., Wu, P. H., Zhuang, Y. Y., & Huang, Y. M. (2013). Effects of the inquiry-based mobile learning model on the cognitive load and learning achievement of students. Interactive learning environments, 21(4), 338-354.

    21. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.

    22. Shea, P., Li, C. S., Swan, K., & Pickett, A. (2005). Developing learning community in online asynchronous college courses: The role of teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(4), 59-82.

    23. Arbaugh, J. B. (2001). How instructor immediacy behaviors affect student satisfaction and learning in web-based courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(4), 42-54.

    24. Rourke, L., & Kanuka, H. (2009). Learning in communities of inquiry: A review of the literature. Journal of Distance Education, 23(1), 19-48.

    25. Anderson, T. (2008). Teaching in an online learning context. In The Theory and Practice of Online Learning (2nd ed., pp. 273-294). Athabasca University Press.