Unravelling the factors impinging the implementation of classroom based assessment in Malaysian ESL classrooms: Voice from practitioners
List of Authors
  • Anwar Farhan Mohamad Marzaini , Wan Nurul Elia Haslee Sharil

Keyword
  • Classroom Based Assessment, Issues, Malaysian ESL Classrooms

Abstract
  • This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the multifaceted factors that influence the implementation of CBA in Malaysian secondary school ESL classrooms. The qualitative data collection was adopted through the focus group and individual semi-structured interviews. Data were gathered from macro-, meso, and micro-level education providers to cast light on the tripartite factors influencing policy implementation. At the macro level, the study revealed that teachers' attitudes towards CBA, characterised by resistance to change and scepticism, pose substantial obstacles to its effective implementation. In addition, the hasty and haphazard introduction of CBA policies impeded their adoption, highlighting the significance of deliberate and well-paced policy implementation. At the meso level, the research uncovered problems such as improper delivery of CBA, lack of expert support, and non-adaptive teachers who struggle to integrate CBA into their teaching practises effectively. On the other hand, the study cast light on critical issues related to teachers' assessment literacy at the micro level. Evidently, an overreliance on exam-oriented assessment practices limited the scope of CBA's benefits. In addition, the study found that large class sizes and student resistance to non-traditional assessment methods further complicate successful implementation at this level. This study has implications beyond the Malaysian context and provides valuable insights for other educational systems seeking to enhance assessment practises and student learning outcomes in ESL classrooms. Ultimately, this study potentially to contribute to the ongoing discussion on CBA by providing educators and policymakers with guidance on how to establish more effective and equitable learning environments for secondary school ESL students.

Reference
  • 1. Alhamad, R. (2018). Challenges and Induction Needs of Novice English as a Foreign Language Teachers in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.1p.50

    2. Andrade, H. L., & Cizek, G. J. (2010). Handbook of formative assessment. Routledge.

    3. Antoniou, P., & James, M. (2014). Exploring formative assessment in primary school classrooms: Developing a framework of actions and strategies. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(2), 153–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9188-4

    4. Arumugham, K. S. (2020). KURIKULUM, PENGAJARAN DAN PENTAKSIRAN DARI PERSPEKTIF PELAKSANAAN PENTAKSIRAN BILIK DARJAH. Asian People Journal (APJ), 3(1), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.37231/apj.2020.3.1.175

    5. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2017). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran. Pendidikan Moral Tingkatan Dua. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

    6. Balang, N. J. A., Mahamod, Z., & Buang, N. A. (2020). Proficiencies in Curriculum Aspects among School Improvement Specialist Coaches Plus (Sisc+). Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5A), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081913

    7. Bayissa, M. F., & Jote, C. A. (2019). Factors Affecting the Implementation of Formative Assessment in Some Selected Primary Schools in Nekemte Town, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. Annals of Social Sciences & Management Studies, 4(3), 71-80.

    8. Black, P. (2015). Formative assessment – an optimistic but incomplete vision. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(1), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2014.999643

    9. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working Inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 8–21.

    10. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

    11. Boyle, B., & Charles, M. (2013). Formative assessment for teaching and learning. Sage.

    12. Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

    13. Chen, Q. (2017). Localized Representation of Formative Assessment in China: A Regional Study from a Sociocultural Perspective*. Frontiers of Education in China, 12(1), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.3868/s110-006-017-0005-9

    14. Chen, Q., Zhang, J., & Li, L. (2021). Problematising formative assessment in an undeveloped region of China: voices from practitioners. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-021-09369-5

    15. Chibali, W., & Mwami, J. (2022). Teachers’ Attitude on Implementing the Free Basic Education in Kiteto District Council, Tanzania. East African Journal of Education Studies, 5(3), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.5.3.854

    16. Chin, H., Thien, L. M., & Chiew, C. M. (2019). THE REFORMS OF NATIONAL ASSESSMENTS IN MALAYSIAN EDUCATION SYSTEM. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 4(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol4iss1pp93-111

    17. Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0742-051x(02)00053-7

    18. Cisse, F., Ndinga, P., & Sane, M. (2021). Publication - Challenges Related to the Practice of Formative Assessment in the Context of the Competency-Based Approach in Quebec. Www.ijires.org. https://www.ijires.org/index.php/issues?view=publication&task=show&id=641

    19. Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research : planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education International.

    20. Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research Design (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

    21. Darling-Hammond, L. (2014). Getting teacher evaluation right : what really matters for effectiveness and improvement. Hawker Brownlow Education.

    22. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/product-files/Effective_Teacher_Professional_Development_REPORT.pdf

    23. Datnow, A. (2012). Teacher Agency in Educational Reform: Lessons from Social Networks Research. American Journal of Education, 119(1), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1086/667708

    24. Datt, S. (2017, July 26). Defining research strategy in a research paper on business studies. Knowledge Tank. https://www.projectguru.in/publications/research-strategy-business-studies/

    25. Eli, A., & Yamat, H. (2021). A Preliminary Study on Classroom Based Assessment for English Speaking Performance Among Year 5 Pupils in An Urban School. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society, 3(4), 45–51. https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijares/article/view/16660

    26. Enu, J. (2021). Factors affecting teacher educators adoption of formative assessment strategies in the mathematics classroom. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 15(4), 483–489. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i4.20341

    27. Flores, M. A. (2012). The implementation of a new policy on teacher appraisal in Portugal: how do teachers experience it at school? Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 24(4), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-012-9153-7

    28. Garrison, C., & Ehringhaus, M. (2011). Formative and Summative Assessments in the Classroom. http://ccti.colfinder.org/sites/default/files/formative_and_summative_assessment_in_the_classroom.pdf

    29. Ghavifekr, S., & Pillai, N. S. (2016). The relationship between school’s organizational climate and teacher’s job satisfaction: Malaysian experience. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9411-8

    30. Hajmi, H., & Jamaludin, K. (2022). Kesediaan Guru Dalam Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah Di Sekolah Rendah. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 4(4), 119–125. https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/jdpd/article/view/20751

    31. Harlen, W. (2007). The quality of learning. Routledge.

    32. Izci, K. (2016). Internal and External Factors Affecting Teachers' Adoption of Formative Assessment to Support Learning. Online Submission, 10(8), 2774-2781.

    33. Jones, A., & Moreland, J. (2007). The importance of pedagogical content knowledge in assessment for learning practices: a case-study of a whole-school approach. Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170500136044

    34. Laveault, D., & Allal, L. (2018). ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING : meeting the challenge of implementation. Springer .

    35. Looney, A., Cumming, J., van Der Kleij, F., & Harris, K. (2017). Reconceptualising the role of teachers as assessors: teacher assessment identity. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(5), 442–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2016.1268090

    36. Machin, S., McNally, S., & Ruiz-Valenzuela, J. (2020). Entry through the narrow door: The costs of just failing high stakes exams. Journal of Public Economics, 190, 104224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104224

    37. Masole, T. M. (2011). Enhancing the quality of performance assessment in agriculture in Botswana schools (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria).

    38. Mellati, M., & Khademi, M. (2018). Exploring Teachers’ Assessment Literacy: Impact on Learners’ Writing Achievements and Implications for Teacher Development. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n6.1

    39. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass, Cop.

    40. Mestry, R. (2017). Empowering principals to lead and manage public schools effectively in the 21st century. South African Journal of Education, 37(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v37n1a1334

    41. Mohamad Hanapi, M. H., Zakaria, N., & Muner, S. (2021). READINESS LEVEL OF PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS IN KLANG DISTRICT, SELANGOR IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF IN-CLASS ASSESSMENT FROM THE ASPECT OF KNOWLEDGE. International Journal of Modern Education, 3(9), 01–08. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijmoe.39001

    42. Mohamad Marzaini, A. F., Haslee Sharil, W. N. E., Supramaniam, K., & Mat Yusoff, S. (2023). Evaluating Teachers’ Assessment Literacy in Enacting Cefr-Aligned Classroom-Based Assessment in Malaysian Secondary Schools ESL Classroom. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v12-i1/15691

    43. Mudin, V. (2019). An Investigation into English Teachers’ Understandings and Practices of Formative Assessment in the Malaysian Primary ESL Classroom: Three Case Studies (Doctoral dissertation, University of East Anglia).

    44. Nagase, K., Tsunoda, K., & Fujita, K. (2020). The Effect of Teachers’ Attitudes and Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Education on Emotional Distress in Primary School Teachers in Japan. Frontiers in Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.570988

    45. Naidoo, P., & Petersen, N. (2016). Towards a leadership programme for primary school principals as instructional leaders. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v5i3.371

    46. Omar, A. (2015). Languages in the Malaysian Education System. Routledge.

    47. Pang, E., & Wray, D. (2017). A Framework on Exploring Primary School English Language Teachers’ Perceptions of their Continuing Professional Development in Malaysia. ATHENS JOURNAL of EDUCATION, 4(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.4-1-4

    48. Pattalitan Jr, A. (2016). The Implications of Learning Theories to Assessment and Instructional Scaffolding Techniques. American Journal of Educational Research, 4(9), 695–700. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-4-9-9

    49. Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1189–1208. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1089059/

    50. Pill, J., & Harding, L. (2013). Defining the language assessment literacy gap: Evidence from a parliamentary inquiry. Language Testing, 30(3), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532213480337

    51. Puckett, M. B., & Black, J. K. (2000). Authentic Assessment of the Young Child: Celebrating Development and Learning. Second Edition. In ERIC. Prentice-Hall Order Processing Center, P. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED435653

    52. Rahman, H. (n.d.). From curriculum reform to classroom practice: An evaluation of the English primary curriculum in Malaysia [Ph D Thesis]. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/7511/

    53. Reames, E. H. (2018). Rural turnaround leadership development : the power of partnerships. Information Age Publishing, Inc.

    54. Rethinasamy, S., Ramanair, J., & Chuah, K.-M. (2021). English Medium Instruction at Crossroads: Students’ Voice and Way Forward. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(14). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i14/8533

    55. Rosli, R., Mokhsein, S., Suppian, Z., Kunci, K., Kendiri, E., Darjah, B., Faktor-Faktor, S., & Rendah. (2021). International Journal of Education and Training Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Efikasi Kendiri Guru dalam Melaksanakan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah di Sekolah Rendah. International Journal of Education and Training (InjET), 7(1), 1–6. http://www.injet.upm.edu.my/images/volume/isukhas7okt_2021/Faktor%20yang%20Mempengaruhi%20Efikasi%20Kendiri%20Guru%20dalam%20Melaksanakan%20Pentaksiran%20Bilik%20Darjah%20di%20Sekolah%20Rendah.pdf

    56. Sullivan, A. M., & Morrison, C. (2014). Enacting policy: the capacity of school leaders to support early career teachers through policy work. The Australian Educational Researcher, 41(5), 603–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-014-0155-y

    57. Tan, A. L., & Towndrow, P. A. (2009). Catalyzing student–teacher interactions and teacher learning in science practical formative assessment with digital video technology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.07.007

    58. Tee, D. D., & Ahmed, P. K. (2014). 360 degree feedback: an integrative framework for learning and assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(6), 579–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.901961

    59. Turner, F., Brownhill, S., & Wilson, E. (2016). The transfer of content knowledge in a cascade model of professional development. Teacher Development, 21(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2016.1205508

    60. Ulas, J., & Aksu, M. (2015). Development of Teacher Autonomy Scale for Turkish Teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 344–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.023

    61. UNESCO. (2013) The Malaysia education policy review. Bangkok: UNESCO. Available: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002211/221132e.pdf [Accessed: 29 July 2018].

    62. Veldhuis, M., & Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2019). Correction to: Supporting primary school teachers’ classroom assessment in mathematics education: effects on student achievement. Mathematics Education Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00281-2

    63. Wedell, M. (2005). Cascading training down into the classroom: The need for parallel planning. International Journal of Educational Development, 25(6), 637–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2005.03.004

    64. Wiliam, D. (2015). Embedding Formative Assessment : Practical Techniques for K-12 Classrooms. (No Title). https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130000794193583360

    65. Yan, Q., Zhang, L. J., & Cheng, X. (2021). Implementing Classroom-Based Assessment for Young EFL Learners in the Chinese Context: A Case Study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 541–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00602-9

    66. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications.