1. Azid, N., Shi, L. Y., Saad, A., Man, S. C., and Heong, Y. M. (2022).The Covid-19 pandemic: Web 2.0 tools as an alternative instruction for science in secondary schools. Teaching and Learning, 2, 5.
2. Abd Gani, N. I., Rathakrishnan, M., and Krishnasamy, H. (2019). The effectiveness of Blended Learning on learners’ interaction and satisfaction. Opción: Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, 24, 48- 62.
3. Chen, P.-J., and Chen, Y.-H. (2022). Massive Open Online Course Study Group: Interaction Patterns in Face-to-Face and Online (Facebook) Discussions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 6599.
4. Guggemos, J., Moser, L., and Seufert, S. (2022). Learners don't know best: Shedding light on the phenomenon of the K-12 MOOC in the context of information literacy. Computers and education, 188, 104552.
5. Almutairi, F., and White, S. (2018). How to measure student engagement in the context of blended-MOOC. Interactive Technology and Smart Education.
6. Edwards, R. L., Davis, S. K., Hadwin, A. F., and Milford, T. M. (2020). Exploring student engagement factors in a blended undergraduate course.
7. Halverson, L. R., and Graham, C. R. (2019). Learner engagement in blended learning environments: A conceptual framework. Online Learning, 23(2), 145-178.
8. Henrie, C. R., Bodily, R., Manwaring, K. C., and Graham, C. R. (2019). Exploring intensive longitudinal measures of student engagement in blended learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 131-155.
9. Amashi, R., Koppikar, U., Vijayalakshmi, M., and Kandakatla, R. (2022). Investigation of Student's Engagement in Blended PBL-based Engineering Course and its Influence on Performance. Paper presented at the 2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).
10. Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., and Gannaway, D. (2019). Progress and new directions for teaching and learning in MOOCs. Computers and Education, 129, 48-60.
11. Hoi, V. N., and Le Hang, H. (2021). The structure of student engagement in online learning: A bi‐factor exploratory structural equation modelling approach. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(4), 1141-1153.
12. Almutairi, F., and White, S. (2018). Measuring on-campus student engagement in the context of blended-MOOC. In International Conference E-Society 11-23.
13. Hussain, R. M. R., and Ng, H. Z. (2013). Training academicians to develop personalized learning environment and students engagement (PLEaSE). International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 4(4), 16-30.
14. Setiawan, A. W. (2021). Implementation of enhanced hybrid learning to improve students' engagement. Paper presented at the 2021 30th Annual Conference of the European Association for Education in Electrical and Information Engineering (EAEEIE).
15. Pye, G., Holt, D., and Salzman, S. (2018). Investigating different patterns of student engagement with blended learning environments in Australian business education: Implications for design and practice. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 22.
16. Thomas, C. L., and Allen, K. (2021). Driving engagement: investigating the influence of emotional intelligence and academic buoyancy on student engagement. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(1), 107-119.
17. Vapiwala, F., and Pandita, D. (2022). Fostering student engagement in e-learning using mobile technology. 2022 IEEE 8th Information Technology International Seminar (ITIS). IEEE, 2022: 86-89.
18. Rahman, A. A., Zaid, N. M., Abdullah, Z., Mohamed, H., and Aris, B. (2015). Emerging project based learning in flipped classroom: Technology used to increase students' engagement. 2015 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT). IEEE, 2015: 212-215.
19. Jha, M., Jha, S., Thakur, S., and Xu, J. (2022). Student engagement and leaning through digital educational technology. 2022 IEEE Asia- Pacific Conference on Computer Science and Data Engineering (CSDE). IEEE, 2022: 1-6.
20. Santos, W. M. d., Secoli, S. R., and Püschel, V. A. d. A. (2018). The Joanna Briggs Institute approach for systematic reviews. Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 26.
21. Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Hilliger, I., Alario-Hoyos, C., Kloos, C. D., and Rayyan, S. (2017). H-MOOC framework: reusing MOOCs for hybrid education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29, 47-64.
22. Mohd, I. H., Hussein, N., Aluwi, A. H., and Omar, M. K. (2016). Enhancing students engagement through blended learning satisfaction and lecturer support. Paper presented at the 2016 IEEE 8th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED).
23. Sun, Y., Ni, L., Zhao, Y., Shen, X. L., and Wang, N. (2019). Understanding students' engagement in MOOCs: An integration of self‐determination theory and theory of relationship quality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3156-3174.
24. Singh, A., Rocke, S., Pooransingh, A., and Ramlal, C. J. (2019). Improving student engagement in teaching electric machines through blended learning. IEEE Transactions on Education, 62(4), 297-304.
25. Pye, G., Holt, D., and Salzman, S. (2022). Factor structures associated with online student engagement in campus-based blended and online distance education settings. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 26.
26. Ma, J., Cheng, J., and Han, X. (2017). Initial development process of a student engagement scale in blended learning environment. Paper presented at the 2017 International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT).
27. Holbrey, C. E. (2020). Kahoot! Using a game-based approach to blended learning to support effective learning environments and student engagement in traditional lecture theatres. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(2), 191-202.
28. Abd Gani, N. I., Rathakrishnan, M., and Krishnasamy, H. (2019). The effectiveness of Blended Learning on learners’ interaction and satisfaction. Opción: Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, 24, 48- 62.