Socialisation and communication of women school managers: a rural perspective
List of Authors
  • Netshitangani, Tshilidzi

Keyword
  • Communicative competence, socialisation theory, poststructuralists, cultural tradition, respect

Abstract
  • This article is based on the findings of a qualitative study that was conducted at a rural secondary school in the Limpopo province of South Africa. The aim of the study was to explore the communication strategies of a woman principal given that socialisation into gender positions is considered a major influential factor. The school was identified by means of reputational sampling. The article endeavours to show through the findings of the study that rural women educational managers’ communication relationship with the teachers can be largely marked by "respect" grounded in their traditional customs. Although socialised into a particular style of communication, their communicative behaviours also result from the context in which they grew and in which they find themselves, one common to all principals, males or females. They are able to use both feminine and masculine styles of communication and succeed in their management. Therefore, communication can be improved by combining both feminine and masculine styles of talking.

Reference
  • 1. Acker, S. (1993). Contradictions in terms: women academics in British universities, in Arnot, Madeleine, & Kathleen Weiler (eds) (1993) Feminisms and social justice in education: international perspectives. Psychology Press.
    2. Brassington, Frances, and Stephen Pettitt (2007), Essentials of Marketing. Harlow: Pearson education.
    3. Coates, J. & Cameron, D. (1990). Women in their speech communities. London: Longman. Coates, J. (2004). Women, men, and language: A sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language. Pearson Education.
    4. Davies, B. 1992. Women's subjectivity and feminist stories. Investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experience, 53-76.
    5. Djordjevic, A. & Cotton, D. 2011. Communicating the sustainability message in higher education institutions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(4), 381-394.
    6. Duff, P. 2008. Language socialization, participation and identity: Ethnographic approaches. In Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 860-872). Springer US.
    7. Duff, P. 2010a. Language Socialization into Academic Discourse Communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 169-192.
    8. Duff, P. 2010b. Language socialization. In N. H. Hornberger & S. McKay (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education (pp. 427–452). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    9. Duff, P. & Nancy H. (eds.) 2008. Encyclopedia of language and education: Vol. 8. Language socialization (pp. 3–15). New York: Springer.
    10. Duranti, A., Ochs E. & Schieffelin B. 2012. The handbook of language socialisation. USA: WileyBlackwell.
    11. Garrett, Merrill F. (1978). Word and sentence perception. In Perception (pp. 611- 625). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
    12. Greenfield, P. & Rodney C. (eds.) 2014. Cross-cultural roots of minority child development. Psychology Press.
    13. Haldeman, D. 2012. Guidelines for psychological practice with lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients. Am Psychol, 67(1), 10-42.
    14. Holmes, J. (2013). Women, men and politeness. London: Routledge.
    15. Jones, A. 1993. Becoming a ‘girl’: post‐ structuralist suggestions for educational research. Gender and Education, 5(2), 157-166.
    16. Kelly, A. (ed.) (1981). The missing half: Girls and science education. Manchester, England: Man-Chester University Press.
    17. Kaiser, A., Haller, S., Schmitz, S. & Nitsch, C.(2009. On sex/gender related similarities and differences in fMRI language research. Brain Research Reviews, 61(2), 49-59.
    18. Measor, L. & Sikes P. (1992). Gender and schooling. London: Cassell.
    19. Mills, S. (2003). Gender and politeness.UK: Cambridge University Press. Mkhwanazi, N. 2012. A tough love approach indeed; demonising early childbearing in the Zuma era. Agenda, 9(26.4), 73-84.
    20. Morita, N. 2009. Language, culture, gender, and academic socialization. Language and Education, 23, 443–460.
    21. Netshitangani, T. & Msila V. 2014. When the Headmaster Is Female: Women’s Access to Education Management Positions in a Rural Setting. Pensee Journal. 76(10), 259-266.
    22. Ochs, E. & Schieffelin B. (2008). Language socialization: An historical overview. In Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 2580-2594).
    23. Springer US. Palomares, N. A. 2009. Women Are Sort of More Tentative Than Men, Aren't They?How Men and Women Use Tentative Language Differently, Similarly, and Counterstereotypically as a Function of Gender Salience. Communication Research, 36(4), 538-560.
    24. Popescu, A. & Gunter H. 2011. Romanian women head teachers and the ethics of care. School Leadership & Management, 31(3), 261-279.
    25. Renzaho, A., Green J., Mellor D. & Swinburn B. 2011. Parenting, family functioning and lifestyle in a new culture: the case of African migrants in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Child & family social work, 16(2), 228-240.
    26. Rush, R. & Allen D. 1990. Communications at the crossroads: the gender gap connection. Women's International Network News, 16(3), 46.
    27. Schmeeckle, M. & Sprecher S. 2004. Extended family and social networks. Handbook of family communication, 349-375.
    28. Shambalala, H. 2010. Improving economic development through effective communication strategies in Nelson Mandela Bay. Masters Dissertation, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University.
    29. Saldaña, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (No. 14). London: Sage.
    30. Stout, J. & Dasgupta N. 2011. When he doesn’t mean you: Gender-exclusive language as ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(6), 757-769.
    31. Thakhathi, T. (2001). Communication strategies of women principals of secondary schools. DEd Dissertation. University of South Africa.
    32. Twum-Danso A. (2009). Reciprocity, respect and responsibility: the 3Rs underlying parent-child relationships in Ghana and the implications for children's rights. Int'l J. Child. Rts., 17, 415.
    33. Walkerdine,V. (1981). 'Sex, power and pedagogy', Screen Education, 38, pp. 14-24.
    34. Weiner, G. (1994). Feminisms in education: An introduction. Buckingham: Open University Press. Yin, R. 2010. Qualitative research from start to finish. New York: Guilford Press.