Politeness in email communication among arab postgraduate students in a malaysian public university
List of Authors
  • Krish, Pramela , Qassim Salman

Keyword
  • Politeness, email communication

Abstract
  • Computer-mediated Communication (CMC) is a common form of communication among students and lecturers at universities. This study aimed to explore politeness strategies employed by Arab students in communicating via emails with their lecturers in a public Malaysian university. The research design used in this study is qualitative where fifty emails of both male and female Arab students were collected to identify and analyze the politeness strategies, directness level, and syntactic and lexical choice. Politeness strategies are analyzed according to Brown and Levinson’s (1987) notion of politeness, while Blum-Kulka and Olshtain’s (1984) Cross Cultural Speech Act Realization Project (CCSARP) is used to analyze directness level, syntactic and lexical choice. The findings of the study reveal that female students are more aware of using the suitable strategy; they usually are more indirect in requests that contain high level of imposition, like requests for feedback. Conversely, male students always use direct strategies when they request for feedback. To reduce their force of imposition, male students resort to lexical politeness markers, such as apologies and please. The study concludes with recommendations for further related studies.

Reference
  • 1. Baron, N. S. (1984). Computer-mediated communication as a force in language change. Visible Language, 18(2), 118-141.
    2. Baron, N. (1998). Letters by phone or speech by other means: The linguistics of e-mail. Language and Communication, 18(2): 133-170.
    3. Baron, N. S. (2002). Who sets e-mail style? Prescriptivism, coping strategies, and democratizing communication access. The Information Society, 18, 403-413.
    4. Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2005). Communication topics and strategies in email consultation: Comparison between American and international university students. Language Learning & Technology, 9(2), 24-46.
    5. Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2007). Students writing emails to faculty: An examination of e-politeness among native and non-native speakers of English. Language Learning & Technology, 11(2), 59-81.
    6. Bloch, J. (2002). Student/teacher interaction via email: The social context of Internet discourse. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 117-134.
    7. Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1984). Requests and Apologies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns(CCSARP). Applied linguistics, 5(3), 196-213.
    8. Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989).The CCSARP Coding Manual. Ed. Blum-Kulka, S. House, J. & Kasper, G. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies p.p. 273- 294. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    9. Bulut, D., & Rababah, G. (2007). Pragmatics of e-mail communication between Saudi female students and male professors. The JALT CALL Journal, 3, 49-73.
    10. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals of language use: Politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (Ed.),Questions and politeness (pp. 56-324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    11. Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987).Politeness: some universals in language usage. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 4: Cambridge University Press.
    12. Cameron, D. (2003). Globalizing "communication". In J. Aitchison & D. M. Lewis (Eds.), New media language (pp. 27-35). New York: Routledge.
    13. Chalak, A., Eslami-Rasekh, Z., & Eslami-Rasekh, A. (2010). Communication strategies and topics in e-mail interactions between Iranian EFL students and their instructors. International Journal of Language Studies, 4(4), 129-147.
    14. Chejnová, P. (2014). Expressing politeness in the institutional e-mail communications of university students in the Czech Republic. Journal of Pragmatics, 60, 175-192.
    15. Chen, C-F. E. (2001). Making e-mail requests to professors: Taiwanese vs. American students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, St-Louis, MO. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 461 299).
    16. Chen, C-F. E. (2006). The development of e-mail literacy: From writing to peers to writing to authority figures. Language Learning & Technology, 10(2), 35-55.
    17. Downing, A. & Locke, P. (2002).A University Course in English Grammar. London and New York: Routledge.
    18. Duthler, K. W. (2006). The politeness of requests made via email and voicemail: Support for the hyperpersonal model. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 11(2), 500-521.
    19. Hartford, B. S. & Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1996). At your earliest convenience: A study of written student requests to faculty. In L. F. Bouton (Ed.), Pragmatics and language learning, Vol.7 (pp. 55-71). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, Division of English as an International Language.
    20. Herring, S. (2000). Gender Differences in CMC: Findings and Implications. CPSR Newsletter 18(1). Retrieved 1, March 2009 from http://www.cpsr.org/issues/womenintech/herring.
    21. Jessmer, S. L., & Anderson, D. (2001). The effect of politeness and grammar on user perceptions of electronic mail. North American Journal of Psychology, 3(2), 331-346.
    22. Lee, C. F. K. (2004). Written requests in e-mails sent by adult Chinese learners of English. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 17, 58-72.
    23. Leech, Geoffrey N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
    24. Lubecka, A. (2000). Requests, invitations, apologies and compliments in American English and Polish: a cross-cultural communication perspective. Kraków: KsięgarniaAkademicka.
    25. Martin, M. M., Myers, S. A., &Mottet, T. P.(1999). Students' motives for communicating with their instructors. Communication Education, 48: 157-164.
    26. Najeeb, Z. M., Maros, M., & Nor, N. F. M. (2012). Politeness in e-mails of Arab students in Malaysia. GEMA: Online Journal of Language Studies,12(1), 125-145.
    27. Payne, C. (1997). Opening the door with e-mail: From no tech to low-tech. Retrieved June 16, 2009, from http://tcc.kcc.hawaii.edu/previous/TCC%201997/payne.html.
    28. Poling, D. J. (1994). Email as an effective teaching supplement. Educational Technology, 34(5): 53-55.
    29. Ronau, R. N., &Stroble, B. (1999). Student teacher electronic network: Expenditure or investment? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education ,7(1): 33-55.
    30. Ruzickova, E. (2007). Strong and mild requestive hints and positive-face redress in Cuban Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(6): 1170–1202.
    31. Samar, G., Navidinia, H., & Mehrani, M. B. (2010). Communication purposes and strategies in email communication: A contrastive analysis between Iranian and American students. International Journal of Language Studies,4(3), 55-72. .
    32. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23: 3-44.
    33. Weizman, E. (1989). “Requestive hints.” In: Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. & Kasper, G. (eds.).Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies, pp. 71-95. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corporation.