Exploring the third place theory in the context of existing recreation space in Malaysia
List of Authors
  • Ahmad Faisol Yusof , Jamaludin Muhamad, Mohd Zikri Mohd Zaki, Muhamad Amirul Amin Ismail, Muhammad Faris Arman, Nur Nabilah Afini Hafizi

Keyword
  • Third Place Theory, Recreation, Community Well-being, Inclusive Design

Abstract
  • The concept of the “Third Place” refers to informal public gathering spaces that foster social interactions and community cohesion beyond the home (first place) and workplace (second place). This study aims to clarify the relationship between recreation spaces and their role as third places to create useful, engaging, adaptive, and pleasant experiences for community citizens and guests. The objectives of this research are to identify characteristic of third places for recreation spaces and decode these elements within three selected case studies in Penang, Malaysia. This study includes document reviews and on-site observational data. Findings show that the elements most prevalent and similar to third-place theory are neutral ground, regularity, accessibility, and inclusivity, which significantly enhance the social and communal functions of the recreation spaces. In contrast, elements such as multi-sensory experiences, benefits for both youth and adults, customizable levels of privacy, low profile, and opportunities for personalization were found to be either absent or limited in number. By identifying and decoding existing precedent studies, this research opens opportunities for designers to enhance recreation space design through the integration of third-place characteristics, thereby creating dynamic community hubs that foster interaction, inclusivity, and well-being.

Reference
  • 1. Al-Emadi, L., Thompson, E., & Hedin, R. (2017). Stadiums and sports facilities in Qatar: Architecture, engineering, and design. Bloomsbury Publishing.

    2. Beall, J., & Fox, S. (2009). Cities and Development. USA and Canada: Routledge. Burillo P, baraJaS Á, gallardo l, et al. (2011). The influence of economic factors in urban sports facility planning: a study on Spanish Regions. European Planning Studies, 19(10), 1755-1773.

    3. Campbell, N. (2015). Third Place Characteristics in Planned Retirement Community Social Spaces. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 32, 55-67.

    4. Carmona, M. (2001). The Value of Urban Design: A research commissioned by CABE and DETR to examine the value added by good urban design. London, UK: Thomas Telford Ltd.

    5. Ducheneaut, N., Yee, N., Nickell, E., & Moore, R. (2006, April). ‘‘Alone Together?’’ Exploring the Social Dynamics of Massively Multiplayer Online Games. Paper presented at the CHI 2006, Montreal, Quebec.

    6. Euchner , C. ( 1993 ) . Playing the Field: Why Sports Teams Move and Cities Fight to Keep Them . Baltimore, MD : Johns Hopkins University Press.

    7. Farmer, P., Mulrooney, A., & Amon, R. (1996). Sport facility planning and management. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.

    8. Forlano, L. (2009). WiFi geographies: When code meets place. The Information Society, 25(5), 344-352.

    9. Gratton, C., Shibli, S., & Coleman, R. (2005). Sport and Economic Regeneration in Cities. Journal of Urban Studies, 42(5/6), 985-999.

    10. Gratton, C., & Taylor, P. (1991). Government and the Economics of Sport. Harlow, UK: Longman. Guinhouya, B. C. (2012). Physical activity in the prevention of childhood obesity. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 26, 438–447.

    11. Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Society. An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Oxford: Polity Press.

    12. Karababa, E., & Ger, G. (2011). Early modern Ottoman coffeehouse culture and the formation of the consumer subject. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(5), 737-760.

    13. Kim, K. K. (1985). Sportsmen in the Days of Yore. USA: New Straits Times. LaMonte, M. J., Blair, S. N., Church, T. S. (2005). Physical activity and diabetes prevention. Journal of Applied Physiology, 99, 1205–1213.

    14. Mehta, V., & Bosson, J. K. (2010). Third Places and the Social Life of Streets. Environment and Behavior, 42(6), 779–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509344677

    15. Morrison, A. (2019). A Typology of Places in the Knowledge Economy: Towards the Fourth Place. In F. Calabrò, L. Della Spina, C. Bevilacqua (Eds.), New Metropolitan Perspectives. ISHT 2018. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 100 (pp 444-451). Cham: Springer.

    16. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    17. Rosenbaum, M., Sweeney, J., & Windhorst, C. (2009). The restorative qualities of an activity-based, third place café for seniors: Restoration, social support, and place attachment at Mather's - More-Than-a-Café. Seniors Housing & Care Journal, 17