Comparative thermal comfort analysis between modern and traditional residential indoor environments in Selangor, Malaysia
List of Authors
  • Ahmad Faisol Yusof, Amirul Amin Ismail, Farah Noor Adlyn Nor Ehsan, Jamaludin Muhamad, Mohd Zikri Mohd Zaki, Muhammad Faris Arman

Keyword
  • Modern vs Traditional Residential, Housing, Indoor Environments, Thermal Comfort, Green Design Strategies

Abstract
  • The study investigates the indoor thermal environments and comforts levels in Selangor, Malaysia by comparing modern and traditional housing types. The primary objective is to identify differences in thermal comfort between these housing types and understand how architectural features and environmental responses influence temperature variations. A systematic approach was employed, involving six detailed case studies that include mix of both modern and traditional houses. Temperature data were collected using a combination of onsite measurement and simulations, where architectural features were analysed through detail surveys and building inspections. The case study method was chosen for its ability to provide in-depth, contextualised insights, the use of multiple case studies allowed for robust cross-validation and triangulation of findings. The results show that modern houses exhibit more consistent temperature due to presence of insulation, leading to stable indoor environments. In contrast, traditional houses, which rely on passive design strategies, showed larger temperature fluctuations but maintained lower overall temperatures, demonstrating the effectiveness of these strategies in reducing heat gain. The study highlights the benefits and limitation of both housing types. It suggests that integrating traditional passive design elements with modern technologies could optimised thermal comfort while potentially reducing energy consumption. The findings contribute to the ongoing discourse on future research aimed at improving indoor environment quality and energy efficiency in residential building.

Reference
  • 1. Ahmad, S. S., and S. V. Szokolay. (2007) The Performance of a Partially Air-Conditioned Apartment Building in Kuala Lumpur. In Sun, Wind and Architecture, The Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, PLEA 2007, pp. 225-231.

    2. Ahmed, T., Kumar, P., & Mottet, L. (2021). Natural ventilation in warm climates: The challenges of thermal comfort, heatwave resilience and indoor air quality. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 138, 110669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110669

    3. Aithal, A., & Aithal, P. S. (2020). Development and Validation of Survey Questionnaire & Experimental Data – A Systematical Review-based Statistical Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3724105

    4. Alzoubi, H. H. and Malkawi, A. T. (2019). A comparative study for the traditional and modern houses in terms of thermal comfort and energy consumption in Umm Qais City, jordan. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 20(5), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/105324

    5. Arsad, F. S., Hod, R., Ahmad, N., Baharom, M., & Ja'afar, M. H. (2023). Assessment of indoor thermal comfort temperature and related behavioural adaptations: a systematic review. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 30(29), 73137-73149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27089-9

    6. Baharum, M., Surat, M., Tawil, N., & Che-Ani, A. (2014). modern housing tranquillity in malaysia from the aspect of thermal comfort for humid hot climate zone. E3s Web of Conferences, 3, 01008. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20140301008

    7. Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2015). Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573

    8. Dili, A. S., Naseer, M. A., & Varghese, T. Z. (2010). Thermal comfort study of Kerala traditional residential buildings based on questionnaire surveys among occupants of traditional and modern buildings. Energy and Buildings, 42(11), 2139–2150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.07.004

    9. Djamila, Harimi, Chi-Ming Chu, and Sivakumar Kumaresan. (2013) Field study of thermal comfort in residential buildings in the equatorial hot-humid climate of Malaysia. Building and Environment 62 (2013): 133-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.01.017

    10. Farquhar, J., Michels, N., & Robson, J. (2020). Triangulation in industrial qualitative case study research: Widening the scope. Industrial Marketing Management, 87(November 2019), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.001

    11. Jamaludin, N., Mohammed, N. I., Khamidi, M. F., & Wahab, S. N. A. (2015). Thermal Comfort of Residential Building in Malaysia at Different Microclimates. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 170, 613–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.063

    12. Nikolopoulou, M., & Steemers, K. (2003). Thermal comfort and psychological adaptation as a guide for designing urban spaces. Energy and Buildings, 35(1), 95-101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00084-1

    13. Özdamar, S. M., & Umaroğulları, F. (2018). THERMAL COMFORT AND INDOOR AIR QUALITY. international journal of scientific research and innovative technology, 5, 90-109. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326324068

    14. Salsabilla,L., Sari, L. H., Wulandari, E., Agustina, S., Sabila, F., Djamaluddin, M., Taquiddin, Z., & Arafat, P. (2023). The influence of orientation and building design on thermal performance in traditional houses, in Gayo highland region, Aceh, Indonesia. Malaysian Journal of Sustainable, Vol 10. No.2 (2023), 305-325. https:doi:10.24191/myse.v10i2.23642

    15. Song, X., Yang, L., Zheng, W., Ren, Y., & Lin, Y. (2015). Analysis on Human Adaptive Levels in Different Kinds of Indoor Thermal Environment. Procedia Engineering, 121, 151–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.1042

    16. Schaudienst, F., & Vogdt, F. U. (2017). Fanger’s model of thermal comfort: a model suitable just for men? Energy Procedia, 132, 129-134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.658

    17. Tellis, W. (1997). Application of a Case Study Methodology. The Qualitative Report, 3, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/1997.2015

    18. Wu, T., Cao, B., & Zhu, Y. (2018). A field study on thermal comfort and air-conditioning energy use in an office building in Guangzhou. Energy and Buildings, 168, 428-437. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.03.030

    19. Yacob, S., Baharun, A., Wahid, J., Ibrahim, S. H., Ngitar, V., Nawi, M. N. M., & Omar, M. (2020). Thermal Comfort Assessment: A Comparative study of passive ventilation system in Modern and Malay Traditional house. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 75(3), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.75.3.8190

    20. Yang, L., Yan, H., & Lam, J. C. (2014). Thermal comfort and building energy consumption implications – A review. Applied Energy, 115, 164-173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.10.062

    21. Yang, Z., Zhang, W., Qin, M., & Liu, H. (2022). Comparative study of indoor thermal environment and human thermal comfort in residential buildings among cities, towns, and rural areas in arid regions of China. Energy and Buildings, 273, 112373. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112373

    22. Yazan, B. (2015). Three Approaches to Case Study Methods in Education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2102

    23. Yusof, M. Z., Afifi, H., & Said, S. (2020). Determining indoor thermal comfort condition of Kutai house through bioclimatic analysis. Malaysian Jounal of Sustainable Environment, Vol. 7, No.1 (2020), 153-172. https://doi.org/10.24191/myse.v7i1.8921

    24. Zhang, J., Lu, J., Deng, W., Beccarelli, P., & Lun, I. Y. F. (2023). Thermal comfort investigation of rural houses in China: A review. Building and Environment, 235, 110208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110208