The Effectiveness of Asynchronous Learning Community on ESL learners’ skills acquisition
List of Authors
  • Jayanthi Muniandy , Malini Ganapathy

Keyword
  • Asynchronous learning community, English as a second language, community of inquiry, learning skills, social media

Abstract
  • This study investigated the impact of an asynchronous learning community (ALC) on English as a second language (ESL) learners’ skills acquisition. The ALC was designed by incorporating the community of inquiry (CoI) framework, which highlights cognitive, social, and teaching presence. The participants of this study consisted of 24 ESL learners and four ESL educators, and they were selected using a purposive sampling method. Focus groups and one-to-one semi-structured interviews were conducted to gather data. The responses were analysed using thematic analysis. The results showed that opinion-based discussions play an essential role in enhancing learners’ skills, particularly their higher-order thinking skills. The study also identified some challenges ESL learners encountered in the ALC, such as improper time management skills, lack of participation, and a sense of isolation. Therefore, some effective strategies were proposed to overcome these challenges. The study recommends that the ALC approach that integrates the CoI framework should be embedded in the ESL curriculum to develop learners’ skills and foster a sense of community in the virtual learning environment. This approach can lead to better outcomes for learners in terms of skill acquisition and their ability to succeed in academic and professional settings.

Reference
  • 1. Al-Said, K. (2015). Students' perceptions of Edmodo and mobile learning and their real barriers towards them. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(2), 167-180.
    2. Alavi, S. M., & Taghizadeh, M. (2013). Cognitive presence in a virtual learning community: An EFL case. International Journal of E-Learning and Distance Education, 27(1), 1-15.
    3. Alivo, R. A., Cerbito, A. F., & Formaran, M. J. A. (2022). Perceived barriers in the sudden transition to asynchronous and synchronous online distance learning of radiologic technology Student. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 4(1), 74 - 81. http://dx.doi.org/10.54476/iimrj10
    4. Anderson, T. (2017). How communities of inquiry drive teaching and learning in the digital age. Contact North.https://teachonline.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/enewsletters/how_communities_of_inquiry_drive_teaching_and_learning_in_the_digital.pdf
    5. Andreatos, A. (2009). On the definition and impact of virtual communities of practice. International Journal of Virtual Communities and Social Networking (IJVCSN), IGI Global, 1(4), 73-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jvcsn.2009092205
    6. Bates, T. (2014, October 1). The role of communities of practice in a digital age. Online learning and distance education resources. https://www.tonybates.ca/2014/10/01/the-role-of-communities-of-practice-in-a-digital-age/
    7. Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. https://doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    8. Castellanos-Reyes, D. (2020). 20 years of the community of inquiry framework. Tech Trends, 64(3), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00491-7
    9. Chandra, S. & Palvia, S. (2021). Online education next wave: peer to peer learning. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 23(3), 157-172. https://doi:10.1080/15228053.2021.1980848
    10. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches (4th ed.).SAGE.
    11. Fiock, H. (2020). Designing a community of inquiry in online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(1), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.3985
    12. Fisher, A., Exley, K., & Ciobanu, D. (2014). Using technology to support learning and teaching. Routledge.
    13. Gannon-Leary, P., & Fontainha, E. (2008). Communities of practice and virtual learning communities: Benefits, barriers and success factors. eLearning Papers, 1-14.
    14. Garrison, D. R. (2014). Community of inquiry. In D. Coghlan & M. Brydon-Miller (Eds.), The SAGE Encyclopaedia of Action Research, (pp. 148–151). Sage.
    15. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education model. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(3), 87-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
    16. Heick, T. (2021, April 5). What is an asynchronous learning community? Teachthought https://www.teachthought.com/learning/what-is-an-asynchronous-learning-community/
    17. Hollister, B., Nair, P., Hill-Lindsay, S., & Chukoskie, L. (2022). Engagement in online learning: Student attitudes and behavior during Covid-19. Frontiers in Education, 7 https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.851019
    18. Jager, J., Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2017). More than just convenient: The scientific merits of homogeneous convenience samples. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 82(2), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12296
    19. Junus, K., Santoso, H.B. & Ahmad, M. (2022). Experiencing the community of inquiry framework using asynchronous online role-playing in computer-aided instruction class. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 2283–2309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10670-5
    20. Kaur, M. (2022). Investigation of factors influencing Malaysia ESL learners’ English-speaking skills. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society, 4(2), 1-6.
    21. Meşe, E., & Sevilen, Ç. (2021). Factors influencing EFL students’ motivation in online learning: A qualitative case study. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 4(1), 11-22.
    22. Muniandy, J. & Shuib, M. (2021). An empirical study of ESP learners’ experiences using Edmodo in a virtual community of practice. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 18(1), 52-66.
    23. Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th Ed.). Pearson New International Edition.
    24. Nussbaum, M., Barahona, C., Rodriguez, F. Guentulle, V., Lopez, F., Vazquez-Uscanga, E., & Cabezas, V. (2021). Taking critical thinking, creativity and grit online. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 201-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09867-1
    25. Peacock, S. & Cowan, J. (2019). Promoting sense of belonging in online learning communities of inquiry at accredited courses. Online Learning, 23(2), 67-81. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1488
    26. Purnawarman, P., Susilawati., & Sundayana, W. (2016). The use of Edmodo in teaching writing in a blended learning setting. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 242-252. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i2.1348
    27. Richardson, J. C., Koehler, A. A., Besser, E. D., Caskurlu, S., Lim, J., & Mueller, C. (2015). Conceptualizing and investigating instructor presence in online learning environments. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3).
    28. Shea, P., Swan, K. & Pickett, A. (2005). Developing learning community in online asynchronous college courses: The role of teaching presence. Online Learning, 9(4), 59-82. https://doi.org/9.10.24059/olj.v9i4.1779
    29. Smith, S. U., Hayes, S., & Shea, P. (2017). A critical review of the use of Wenger's community of practice (CoP) theoretical framework in online and blended learning research, 2000- 2014. Online Learning, 21(1), 209-237. https://doi.org10.24059/olj.v21i1.963
    30. Sornasekaran, H., Mohammed, L.A., & Amidi, A. (2020). Challenges associated with e-learning among ESL undergraduates in Malaysia: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Management and Human Sciences, 4(4), 30-38.
    31. Soto, M. A., & Waigandt, D. (2017). Authenticity in ESP course: Building communities of practice. In D. L. Benegas, M. Lopez-Barrios, & D. Waigandt (Eds.) Authenticity in ELT: Selected papers from the 42nd FAAPI Conference, 109-118. Posadas.
    32. Too, W. K. (2017). English language teaching and policies at the tertiary level in Malaysia. In E. S. Park & B. Spolsky (Eds.) English education at the tertiary level in Asia, 10-129. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315391588-7
    33. Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Introduction to communities of practice: A brief overview of the concept and its uses. http://wenger-trayner.com/introduction-to-communitiesof-practice/
    34. Yau, W. L., Khe, F. H. & Kin, F. C. (2018). Improving argumentative writing: Effects of a blended learning approach and gamification. Language Learning and Technology, 22(1), 97-118.