Ambivalence and sympathy: new orientalism and the arab characters in ridley scott’s body of lies
List of Authors
  • Fauziah Ahmad , Hanan Alaklook , Jamaluddin Aziz

Keyword
  • 9/11, body of lies, sympathy, arab character, ambivalence, new orientalism

Abstract
  • Before the historic event of 9/11, Arab characters have been negatively stereotyped in Hollywood films. During this period, most Arab characters are usually played by Pakistanis or Indians. Nonetheless, post 9/11 sees the emergence of Arab actors playing Arab characters. Therefore, this paper examines a new strategy which is the Arab characters played by Arab actors (we refer to as AaA) in Hollywood films post 9/11 by zooming in on the film Body of Lies (2008) directed by Ridley Scott. Employing one theme from New Orientalism, which is, ambivalence, and one of Alsultany strategies, which is, “sympathizing with the plight of Arab post 9/11”, this paper uses textual analysis as the method, focusing on how the Arab characters are depicted as sympathetic characters and how this in turn creates a sense of ambivalence. Homi Bhabha idea’s of the ambivalence is employed in this paper which proposes that a stereotype is used to mirror the hidden strategy that can be traced in this film. We argue that one way of achieving sympathy is by portraying the Arabs as victims, that is, the film humanized these characters to reflect the Arabs and Muslims in post 9/11 dilemma. However, since the Arab characters are caught between being linked with terrorist attacks by race and religion and being a victim of American collective fear of them, these sympathetic characters, we argue, are merely tool of the New Orientalist.

Reference
  • 1. Abdullah, A. S. (2015). Muslims in Pre- and Post-9/11 Contexts. International Journal of Comparative Literature and Translation Studies, 3(3), pp 53-55. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijclts.v.3n.3p.52 [16-10-2016].
    2. Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life: California, Stanford University Press.
    3. Alsultany, E. (2013). Arabs and Muslims in the media after 9/11: Representational strategies for a” postrace" era. American Quarterly, 65(1), pp 161-169.
    4. Alsultany, E. (2012). Arabs and Muslims in the Media: Race and Representation after 9/11: New York, New York University press.
    5. Bhabha, H. K. (Ed.). (2013). Nation and Narration: Leeds, Routledge Boggs, C., & Pollard, T. (2006). Hollywood and the Spectacle of Terrorism. New Political Science, 28(3), pp 335-351.
    6. Dijk, V. (2009). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. Methods of critical discourse analysis, 2(1), pp 62-86.
    7. Potosky, M. (2008). Sayed Badreya Is a Man of the People. Movie Maker, 16 October. Retrieved from: http://www.moviemaker.com/archives/moviemaking/acting/articles-acting/sayedbadreya-w-oliver-stone-saddam-hussein-20081014/ [16 October 2014].
    8. Rubenstein, B. (2013). Irish Modernism, and the Postcolonial: Indiana, Notre Dame University.
    9. Tamari, S. (2004). Ishaq al-Shami and the Predicament of the Arab Jew in Palestine. Jerusalem Quarterly File, 21(10), 26-50.
    10. Johnson, R. (2006). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of mixed methods research, 1(2), pp 112-133.
    11. Khadduri, M.1980. The Arab League as a Regional Arrangement. The American Journal of International Law, 40(4), 756-777.
    12. Mcleod, J. (2000). Beginning Postcolonialism: Manchester, Manchester University Press.
    13. Marie, I. & Lien, S. (2009). The Transnational Trend in Hollywood Popular Cinema’s New Transnational Aesthetic (Doctoral dissertation): The University of Oslo. Retrieved from: https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/26272/TheTransnationaltrend2.pdf?seque nce=1 [16 November 2014].
    14. Ruddock, A. (2000). Understanding audiences: Theory and method: London, Sage.
    15. Shaheen, J. (2008). Guilty: Hollywood's Verdict on Arabs after 9/11: Hollywood's Verdict on Arabs after 9/11: Massachusetts, Interlink Publishing.
    16. Shaheen, J. G. (2003). Reel bad Arabs: How Hollywood vilifies a people. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 588(1), pp 171-193.