Sustainable leadership practices among schools principals and their relationship with teacher commitment in Malaysia rural school
List of Authors
  • Mohd Izham Mohd Hamzah , Muhammad Hasrizal Abdul Rahim

Keyword
  • Management, rural schools, sustainable leadership, sustainable development goal, teacher commitment

Abstract
  • Through sustainable leadership practices school are able to maintain their missions and goals in facing difficulties and challenges. Such a practice enhances teacher commitment, especially in shaping a better school working environment in achieving the organization goals. Past studies have found a significant link between sustainable leadership practices and the teacher commitment. However, there has been little discussion about the phenomenal relationship in rural National Secondary School context. Hence, this study surveyed the level of sustainable leadership practices among school principals and the teacher commitment in SMK in rural part of Malaysia. It also investigated whether there is a relationship between both variables. Using proportionate random sampling, 450 teachers represented the sample. Due of the COVID-19 epidemic and the research population's remote location, data were collected via mail. The findings revealed that principals had a high level of sustainable leadership practises (M = 4.18, SD = 0.52) as well as a very high degree of teacher commitment (M = 4.33, SD = 0.45). Teacher commitment was also positively connected with sustainable leadership practises (r = 0.503, p 0.05). The Ministry of Education Malaysia can apply these findings to improve sustainable leadership practises in the National Education Principals Professional Qualifications, which are intended exclusively for future Malaysian school principals. In this perspective, it is hoped that these findings will contribute to the body of knowledge on sustainable leadership practises and teacher commitment.

Reference
  • 1. Al-Zawahreh, A., Khasawneh, S., & Al-Jaradat, M. (2018). Green management practices in higher education: The status of sustainable leadership. Tertiary Education and Management, 25(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-018-09014-9
    2. Amirah, A. R., Mohd Jasmy, A. R., Siti Adilah, M. A., Noraina Ayu, R., & Norkamaliah, D. (2018). STEM applications in teaching and facilitation in rural schools: Opportunities and challenges. International Conference on Education and Regional Development. https://icerd2018.conference.upi.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/30/2018/1
    3. Aung, P. N., & Hallinger, P. (2022). Research on sustainability leadership in higher education: A scoping review. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(3), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-09-2021-0367
    4. Babbie, E. (2016). The practice of social research (14th ed.). Cengage Learning.
    5. Billy, Lily James, & Muhamad Suhaimi. (2020). School culture: Its relationship with teacher commitment. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(10), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i10.511
    6. Cohen, A., & Kessler, E. H. (2013). Organizational commitment theory. Encyclopedia of Management Theory. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452276090.n189
    7. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
    8. Cohen, J., McCabe, E. M., Michelli, N. M., & Pickeral, T. (2009). School climate: research, policy, practice, and teacher education. Teachers College Record, 111(1), 180–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100108
    9. Crosswell, L. (2006). Understanding teacher commitment in times of change [PhD dissertation, University of Technology Queensland].
    10. Department of Statistics Malaysia. (n.d.). Household income and basic facilities survey report. https://www.dosm.gov.my/portal-main/landingv2
    11. Evonne, L. E., & Crispina Gregory, K. H. (2018). The relationship of principal leadership and school climate with teacher motivation. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 3(2), 322527. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v3i2.70
    12. Fauzi Hussin, J. A., & Mohd Saifoul, Z. N. (2014). SPS data research and analysis method. UUM Press.
    13. Fraenkel, R. J., & Wallen, E. N. (2008). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). McGraw-Hills.
    14. Gerard, L. J., McMillan, J., & D’Annunzio-Green, N. (2017). Conceptualising sustainable leadership. Industrial and Commercial Training, 49(3), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/ict-12-2016-0079
    15. Ghazali, D., & Sufean, H. (2019). Research methodology in education: Study practice and analysis (3rd ed.). University Malaya Malaysia.
    16. Golafshani, N. (2015). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2003.1870
    17. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable Leadership. Josey-Bas.
    18. Johnson, B., Stevens, J. J., & Zvoch, K. (2007). Teachers’ perceptions of school climate. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(5), 833–844. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164406299102
    19. Kingstrom, P. O., & Mainstone, L. E. (1985). An investigation of the Rater-Ratee acquaintance and rater bias. Academy of Management Journal, 28(3), 641–653. https://doi.org/10.2307/256119
    20. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
    21. Latipah, S., & Mohd Khairuddin, A. (2021). The commitment of the school organization and its relationship with the quality of teaching of level one malay language teachers in rural Sabah. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(1), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i1.618
    22. Lei Mee, T., Nordin, A. R., & Ramayah, T. (2014). Validating teacher commitment scale using a Malaysian sample. SAGE Open, 4(2), 215824401453674. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014536744
    23. Louis, K. S. (1998). Effects of teacher quality of work life in secondary schools on commitment and sense of efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345980090101
    24. Meyer, J. P., & Herscovitch, L. (2001). Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Human Resource Management Review, 11(3), 299–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1053-4822(00)00053-x
    25.
    26. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (n.d.). Malaysia's education development plan 2013-2025. https://www.moe.gov.my/dasarmenu/ pelan-pembangunan-pendidikan-2013-2025.
    27. Ministry of Rural Affairs. (n.d.). Rural development policy 2030 Malaysia. https://www.rurallink.gov.my/
    28. Mohamad Taufiq, J., & Aida Hanim, A. H. (2017). Headmaster’s sustainable leadership practices and their relationship with teacher work satisfaction at the federal territory of Kuala Lumpur high performance primary school. International Seminar on Educational Issues, 111–115.
    29. Mohd Aizat, A. H., Mohd Faiza, R., Mohamad Ekhwan, M. S., & Mohd Mastifino, A. M. (2018). Attitudes toward change in schools in Malaysia. Management Research Journal, 8(1), 188–196. https://doi.10.13140/RG.2.2.30663.34722
    30. Mohd Azmi, M. Y. (2016). Evaluation of training programme in school-based assessment services [PhD dissertation]. The National University of Malaysia.
    31. Mohd Izham, M. H., Nur Syafiqa, A., & Bity Salwana, A. (2018). Sustainable leadership practices of the school administration and its relationship with the competence of the teacher’s constant professionalism. Jurnal Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 32, 61–70. https://eprints.iab.edu.my/v2/id/eprint/919
    32. Mohd Majid, K. (2005). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
    33. Molato-Gayares, R., Park, A., Raitzer, D. A., Suryadarma, D., Thomas, M., & Vandenberg, P. (2022). How to Recover Learning Losses from COVID-19 School Closures in Asia and the Pacific. ADB Briefs. https://doi.org/10.22617/brf220301-2
    34. Musliza, M. J., Siti Noor, I., & Anis Salwa, A. (2018). Work satisfaction and commitment of excellent secondary school teachers in Kelantan. Journal of Educational Leadership, 7(1), 77–90.
    35. Nazir, T. N., Nishad, N., Jayakumar, M., Vijayakumar, G., & Islam, H. (2022). A study on the impact of sustainable leadership and core competencies on sustainable competitive advantage in the information technology (IT) sector. Sustainability, 14(11), 6899. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116899
    36. Neesha, K. M. (2021). Sustainable leadership and school improvement-a conceptual research. Sustainable Leadership and Academic Excellence International Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/slae54202.2021.9788098
    37. Nik Sasliza, S., & Mohd Izham, M. H. (2020). Sustainable leadership practices of principals and the effectiveness of national schools in Hulu Langat, Selangor. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 7(3), 20–37. https://jupidi.um.edu.my/article/%20view%20/25059
    38. Organisation For Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). Education disrupted – education rebuilt: Some insights from PISA on the availability and use of digital tools for learning. OECD Education and Skills Today. https://oecdedutoday.com/coronavirus-education-digital-tools-for-learning/
    39. Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual: A Step-by-Step guide to data analysis using the SPSS program (4th ed.). McGraw Hill.
    40. Rahayu, A. B., Sham, I., Halijah, A., Nor Hazimah, I., & Wan Mohd, W. I. (2020). The role and challenges of leaders in ensuring that educational goals and agenda are sustained during the movement control order period (PKP) COVID-19. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 2(1), 1–23. https://jupidi.um.edu.my/article/%20view%20/25059
    41. Rahayu, J. (2017). Assessment of the implementation of primary school standard curriculum of world science and technology subjects. Researchgate. https://www.researchgate.net /publication /309289477 %0Ahttps://www.ecpat. org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10
    42. Raja Nurmunira, R. H., & Mohamed Yusoff, M. N. (2021). Headmaster’s sustainable leadership practices and teacher work satisfaction at sekolah kebangsaan Padang Jawa Shah Alam. Proceeding Asian Scholars Network International Conference, 3(1), 385–393.
    43. Richeal Phil, T. K. H., & Mohd Zaki, I. (2021). Empowering teacher commitment: How the six dimensions of sustainable leadership play a role. Management Research Journal, 10(2), 49–64.
    44. Roscoe, J. T. (1975). Fundamental research statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Holt Rinehart & Winston.
    45. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach. Wiley & Sons.
    46. Sharique, A., Saeeda, W., Sumaiya, I., Sudarshana, G., Anshika, S., & Zarina, F. (2019). Qualitative v/s. quantitative research- a summarized review. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare, 6(43), 2828–2832. https://doi.org/10.18410/jebmh/2019/587
    47. Siti Azaha, B., & Bity Salwana, A. (2021). Principal sustainable leadership practices and teacher work performance in Hulu Langat national school. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 9(4), 19–37.
    48. Suzana, A. M. (2015). Assessment of the implementation of formative assessment at Kedah Pre-School, Malaysia [PhD dissertation, The National University of Malaysia].
    49. Taylor, R. (1990). Interpreting of the correlation coefficient: A basic review. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, 6(1), 35–39.
    50. United Nations Statistics Division. (2022, July 7). The sustainable development goals report 2022. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2022/
    51. Williams, N. (2016). Culturally responsive leadership in Aotearoa New Zealand secondary schools [MA thesis, . University of Technology New Zealand].
    52. Zamri, Z., & Mohd Izham, M. H. (2020). Sustainable leadership practices of the principal of sekolah menengah harian in Gombak district, Selangor. International Conference on Innovative Approaches in Business, Education and Technology, 159–168.