Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived mutual relationship, perceived interactivity as determinants of social media use among pr practitioners
List of Authors
  • Mukhtar El-kasim , Syed Arabi Idid

Keyword
  • PR Practitioners, social media, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived mutual relationships, perceived interactivity, and behavioral intention

Abstract
  • Social media diffusion has accentuated the practice of public relations across the globe. Studies established the social media’s impact in the promotion of mutual relationships between organizations and publics. However, most of these studies were focused on examining how organizations utilized social media as a whole, little attention was given on examining the perceptions of practitioners on social media as end users particularly from developing countries perspective. The aim of the current study was to investigate the perceptions of public relations practitioners on the relevance of social media for enhancing mutual relationship between organizations and their publics. This study utilized Technology Acceptance model (TAM) as theoretical framework. Specifically, practitioners’ perceptions on perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived mutual relationship, perceived interactivity and behavioral intention were examined. Five hundred and thirteen questionnaires were administered to public relations practitioners through a systematic random sampling. The data collected from the respondents were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). The results of ttest conducted on the five variable suggested that practitioners perceived social media as useful and easy to use in the promotion of mutual relationship between and organizations and their strategic publics. Hence, the result showed that practitioners have positive perceptions on the ability of social media to enhance mutual interactivity. Therefore, practitioners’ behavioral intention to use social media was influenced on the perceptions of the four other variables. However, the result of ANOVA revealed that, young practitioners have higher positive perception on perceived usefulness and perceived mutual relationships variables. The study provides recommendations and conclusion was drawn based on the findings of the study.

Reference
  • 1. Anklam, P. (2009) The Social-Network Toolkit: Building organizational performance through collaborative communities. Retrieved from www.artgroupaustralia.com on 08 December 2013.
    2. Bruning S. D. and Ledingham, J. A. (2000). Relationships and evaluations of satisfaction: An exploration of interaction, Public Relations Review, 26(1) 85-95.
    3. Davis, F. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information system: theory and results, Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.
    4. Davis, F. D. (1989) Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and user acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly Vol. 13, No. 3. Pp. 319-340.
    5. Davis, F., Bagozzi, R. & Warshaw, P. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Jouranal of Applied Social Pyschology,22(14), pp.111-32.
    6. Davis, F. and Venkatesh, V. (1996). A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments. International Journal of Humancomputer Studies, 45(1), pp. 19-45.
    7. Dishaw, M.T. and Strong, D.M.(1999),“Extending the technology acceptance model with task- technology fit constructs”,Information and Management, Vol. (36) pp. 9-21.
    8. Dykeman, M. (2008). How do you define social media?” February 9. Retrieved from http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/02/09/how-do-you-define-social-media/
    9. Gruning, L. A., Gruning, J. E and Dozier, D. M. (2002) Excellence Public Relations and Effective Organizations: A study of communication management in three countries. Mahwah. NJ: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates.
    10. Eyrich, N., Padman, M. L. and Sweetser, K. D. (2008). PR practitioners’ use of social media tools and communication technology. Public Relations Review, 34, 412-414.
    11. Gruning, J. E. (2002) Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. Hillslade, NJ: Lawrance Erlbaum.
    12. Grunig, L. A., Grunig, J. E., & Ehling, W. P. (1992). “What Is An Effective Organization?” inJ.E. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence In Public Relations and Communication Management (pp. 65- 89).Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    13. Grunig, J. E. (2009) Paradigms of global public relations in an age of digitalisation. Prism. vol. 6, no. 2.
    14. Kent, M. L. and Taylor, M. (2002) Toward a dialogic theory of Public Relations. Public Relations Review, 28, 21-27.
    15. Hon, L. C. and Gruning, J. E. (1999) Guidelines for measuring relationships in public relations. Retrieved 13th February, 2012, from www.instituteforpr.org.
    16. Kripanount, N. (2006) Using Technology Acceptance Model to Investigate Academic Acceptance of the Internet. Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics. (2) Pp. 13-28
    17. Ledingham, J. A., Bruning, S. D., Thomlison, T. D., & Lesko, C. (1997). The applicability of interpersonal relationship dimensions to an organizational context: Toward a theory of relational loyalty; A qualitative approach. The Academy of Manageria1 Communications Journal, ](I), 2343.
    18. Ledingham, J. A., & Bruning, S. D. (1998). Relationship management and public relations: Dimensions of an organization–public relationship. Public Relations Review, (24) 55–65.
    19. Ledingham J. A. Bruning, S. D. and Wilson, L. J. (1999). Time as an indicator of the perceptions and behavior of members of a key public: Monitoring and predicting organization-public relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, (11) 167-183.
    20. Marchese, J.(2007).Defining social media. October, 2015 Retrieved from http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=61442
    21. Nah, S. and Saxton G. D. (2013). Modeling the adoption and use of social media by nonprofit organizations. New Media & Society 15(2), 294-313.
    22. Palmer, A. and Koenig-Lewis, N. (2009) "An experiential, social network-based approach to direct marketing", Direct Marketing: An International Journal, Vol. 3 Iss: 3, pp.162 – 176
    23. Seltzer, T. & Mitrook, M. A. (2007). The dialogic potential of weblogs in relationship building. Public Relations Review. 33, Pp. 227-229.
    24. Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), pp. 186-204.
    25. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information System Research, 11(4), pp. 342-365.
    26. Wright, D.K. and Hinson, M.D. (2008e). How blogs and social media are changing public relations and the way it is practiced. Public Relations Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2, Spring, 2008. Retrieved from http://www.prsa.org/prjournal/spring08.html.
    27. Wright, D. K., & Hinson, M. D. (2009). Examining how public relations practitioners actually are using social media. Public Relations Journal, 3(3), 65-74
    28. Wright , D. K. and Hinson, M. D. (2012). Examining how social media have been used in public relations between 2006 and 2012: A longitudinal analysis. Paper presented at the 12th Annual BledCom Conference in Bled, Slovenia, June 2012.
    29. Wright , D. K. and Hinson, M. D. (2013). An updated examination of social media and emerging media use in public relations: A longitudinal analysis between 2006 and 2013. Public Relations Journal. Vol. 7(3), Pp. 2-39.