Innovative work behaviour among Malaysian education officials: a MANOVA Analysis
List of Authors
  • Mohd Izham Mohd Hamzah , Noraine Jamil

Keyword
  • Innovative work behaviour, state education department, educational management, demography, MANOVA

Abstract
  • Organisations must adapt quickly and innovate to improve. Therefore, the goal of this study is to determine the level of Innovative Work Behaviour (IWB) of the State Education Official (SEO) in Malaysia from the dimensions of opportunity exploration, idea generation, idea promotion, idea realisation, and idea sustainability as well as to explore the differences in IWB of the SEO in Malaysia across demographic factors. Respondents represented every region of Malaysia. Analysis of data utilising quantitative research methods. To ensure regional representation, 450 SEO from Northern Region, Central Region, Southern Region, East Coast, and East Malaysia were selected via stratified random sampling and sent online structured questionnaires. The level of IWB was found to be very high (M=4.31, SD=0.51). The SEO's frequency of participation in governance, leadership, and educational management courses during the tenure at the State Education Department (SED) was found to be significant according to Multiple Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) results (Wilks’ λ= 0.939, F (15, 445) =1.878; p=0.022). However, the SEO IWB did not differ by age, position, experience, and academic credentials. The Ministry of Education (MOE) Malaysia and SED may leverage the results of this study to re-evaluate and redesign IWB concepts to improve educational management.

Reference
  • 1. Abdullah, N. A., Mat, N., Hamid, R. A., & Hasni, N. (2016). Tingkah laku inovatif dalam kalangan pelajar pascasiswazah: Satu kajian rintis di Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Jurnal Personalia Pelajar, 19(2), 41–48.
    2. Awang, A. H., Sapie, N. M., Hussain, M. Y., Ishak, S., & Yusof, R. M. (2019). Nurturing innovative employees: Effects of organisational learning and work environment. Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 32, (1).
    3. Azinga, S. A., Obeng, A. F., Ellis, F. Y., & Ansah, M. O. (2023). Assessing the effects of transformational leadership on innovative behavior: the role of affective commitment and psychological capital. In Evidence-based HRM: A global forum for empirical scholarship. Emerald Publishing Limited.
    4. Azerai, A. (2021). Pelaksanaan transformasi PPD dan amalan komitmen perubahan serta hubungannya dengan pembangunan keupayaan kepimpinan sekolah [Unpublished Doctoral's thesis]. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia].
    5. De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x
    6. El Alfy, S., & Naithani, P. (2021). Antecedents of IWB: A systematic review of the literature and future research agenda. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1504/WREMSD.2021.112082
    7. Fern, C. S., & Nurazwa, A. (2018). Strategi Kepimpinan kendiri dalam meningkatkan tingkah laku inovasi di tempat kerja. Jurnal Isu-Isu Inovasi Di Malaysia, 2(1), 87-102.
    8. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evalaute research in education (8th Edition). San Francisco State University.
    9. Fullan, M. (2007). Change the terms for teacher learning. The Learning Professional, 28(3), 35.
    10. Gilson, L. L., & Litchfield, R. C. (2017). Idea collections: A link between creativity and innovation. Innovation, 19(1), 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338. 2016.1270765.
    11. Hamzah, R., & Baharuddin, N. A. F. (2018). Kajian rintis pembangunan modul transformasi kepimpinan diri pelajar luar kampus. International Journal of Humanities Technology and Civilization (IJHTC), 1(4), 36–57. http://journal.ump.edu.my/
    12. Ibrahim, N., Md Sham, F., & Ismail, A. (2016). Gaya kepimpinan Islam satu proses. Juurnal Reflektika, 12(12), 43–58.
    13. Jankelová, N., Joniaková, Z., & Mišún, J. (2021). Innovative work behavior—a key factor in business performance? The role of team cognitive diversity and teamwork climate in this relationship. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(4), 185. MDPI AG. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14040185
    14. Janssen, O. (2003). Innovative behaviour and job involvement at the price of conflict and less satisfactory relations with co-workers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 347–364.
    15. Janssen, O. (2004). How fairness perceptions make innovative behavior more or less stressful. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 201–215.
    16. Jotabá, M. N., Fernandes, C. I., Gunkel, M., & Kraus, S. (2022). Innovation and human resource management: a systematic literature review. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2021-0330
    17. Jung, O. S., Blasco, A., & Lakhani, K. R. (2020). Innovation contest: Effect of perceived support for learning on participation. Health Care Management Review, 45(3), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000211
    18. Juraime, F. B. (2016). Kepimpinan teknologi dan standard kompetensi pengurusan kurikulum dalam kalangan pengetua sekolah menengah harian di Malaysia [Unpublished Doctoral's thesis]. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia].
    19. Kanapathipillai, K., & Azam, S. M. F. (2020). The impact of employee training programs on job performance and job satisfaction in the telecommunication companies in Malaysia. European Journal of Human Resource Management Studies, 4(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejhrms.v4i3.857
    20. Lambriex-Schmitz, P., Van der Klink, M. R., Beausaert, S., Bijker, M., & Segers, M. (2020). When innovation in education works: Stimulating teachers’ IWB. International Journal of Training and Development, 24(2), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12175
    21. Lukes, M., & Stephan, U. (2017). Measuring employee innovation: a review of existing scales and the development of the innovative behavior and innovation support inventories across cultures. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(1), 136-158.
    22. Manso, G. (2017). Creating incentives for innovation. California Management Review, 60(1), 18-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0008125617725287
    23. Md Rahaimi, R., Marzita, A.B., Wan Zaliha, O., & Mahathir Fansuri, A. (2020). Kepentingan kemahiran pengurusan risiko dalam kalangan pemimpin pendidikan dan implikasinya kepada pembangunan kapasiti yang berkesan.
    24. https://iab.moe.edu.my/bahanportal/pemberitahuan/2020/1.%20Artikel%20kemahiran%20pengurusan%20risiko.pdf
    25. Messmann, G., Mulder, R. H., & Gruber, H. (2010). Relations between vocational teachers’ characteristics of professionalism and their innovative work behavior. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 2, 21–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03546487
    26. Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2011). Innovative work behaviour in vocational colleges: Understanding how and why innovations are developed. Vocations and Learning, 4, 63–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12186-010-9049-y
    27. Messmann, G. & Mulder, R. H. (2012). Development of a measurement instrument for innovative work behaviour as a dynamic and context-bound construct. Human Resource Development International, 15(1), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2011.646894
    28. Mohammed Afandi, Z., & Mohd Effendi Ewan, M. M. (2020). How teachers’ IWB can affect education quality ? Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(17), 770–779.
    29. Mohammed Afandi, Z., Mohd Effendi Ewan, M. M., Wan Norshuhadah, W. M., & Noor Hashimah, H. (2020). Kesahan kandungan instrumen pengukuran tingkah laku inovatif guru menggunakan kaedah nisbah kesahan kandungan ( CVR ). Akademika, 90(Isu Khas 3), 43–54.
    30. Mohd Helmi, A. B. (2016). Pengaruh gaya kepimpinan dan kontrak psikologi terhadap tingkah laku inovasi dalam sebuah organisasi ICT yang terpilih, Malaysia [Unpublished Doctoral's thesis, Universiti Putra Malaysia]
    31. Muhaini, Y. (2020). Kajian tahap kompetensi digital pegawai awam. Varia Ranah: Sorotan Ilmiah Perkhidmatan Awam, 374-414.
    32. Nor Azlin, I. (2021). Kepimpinan transformasional dan kecerdasan emosi pengetua serta hubungannya dengan amalan komuniti pembelajaran profesional di sekolah berprestasi tinggi [Unpublished Doctoral's thesis]. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
    33. Nunnally, J. (1994). Psychometric theory. American Educational Research Journal, 5(3), 431. https://doi.org/10.2307/1161962
    34. Nur Atiqah, A., Norazila, M., Roshayati, A.H., & Noor Hasni. (2016). Tingkah laku inovatif dalam kalangan pelajar pascasiswazah : Satu kajian rintis di Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Jurnal Personalia Pelajar, 19(2), 41-8
    35. Nurain Afini, R., & Nurazwa, A. (2020). Hubungan di antara efikasi kendiri dan tingkah laku kerja inovatif dalam kalangan pekerja pembuatan. Isu-Isu Inovasi Di Malaysia Siri 4, December, 43-56.
    36. Pallant, J. (2010). Survival manual. McGraw-Hill Education.
    37. Ridhuan, M. B. M. J. (2016). Pembangunan model kurikulum latihan skives bagi program pengajian kejuruteraan pembelajaran berasaskan kerja [Unpublished Doctoral's thesis]. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
    38. Steyn, R., & de Bruin, G. (2019). The structural validity of the IWB questionnaire: Comparing competing factorial models. The Southern African Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management, 11(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajesbm.v11i1.291
    39. Syafiqah, N., Samad, A., Ismail, A., & Aziz, K. A. (2020). Hubungan antara tahap ganjaran dan komitmen organisasi dengan penglibatan pekerja sebagai pemboleh ubah pengantara. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance. 53, 41–53.
    40. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
    41. Ting, L. X. (2018). Kepimpinan inovatif guru besar dan tingkah laku kerja inovatif guru di daerah Melaka Tengah Negeri Melaka [Unpublished Doctoral's thesis]. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
    42. Wahyuni, W., Sujanto, B., & Supadi, S. (2021). The mediating role of organizational learning in the relationship between organizational commitemnet and lecturer innovative behavior. JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia), 6(1), 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.29210/3003673000
    43. Wan Abdullah, W. A. A., Abdul Razak, K., Hamzah, M. I., & Mohd Zhaffar, N. (2020). Konsep inovasi menurut pandangan guru inovatif pendidikan Islam: The concept of innovation according to innovative teachers of islamic education. ATTARBAWIY: Malaysian Online Journal of Education, 4(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.53840/attarbawiy.v4i1.24
    44. West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1989). Innovation at work: psychological perspectives. Social behaviour, 4,15–30.
    45. Wilkins, A. (2020). The handbook of global education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 35(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.1588523
    46. Yaqoot, E. S. I., Mohd. Noor, W. S. W., & Mohd Isa, M. F. (2017). Antecedents of training effectiveness in Bahrain. Expert Journal of Business and Management, 5(1), 13–21.
    47. Yau, E. K. B., Ping, N. P. T., Shoesmith, W. D., James, S., Hadi, N. M. N., & Lin, L. J. (2020). The behaviour changes in response to covid-19 pandemic within Malaysia. Malays J Med Sci. 2 https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2020.27.2.5