Hubungan motivasi dengan efikasi kendiri pemilihan kerjaya dikalangan pelajar latihan industri Politeknik Sultan Azlan Shah
List of Authors
  • Ahmad Syarifuddin Che Abd Aziz , Wan Hasbullah Wan Mohamed

Keyword
  • motivasi, efikasi kendiri, latihan industri

Abstract
  • Kajian ini dijalankan bagi mengenalpasti hubungan motivasi dengan efikasi kendiri pemilihan kerjaya dikalangan pelajar latihan industri, Politeknik Sultan Azlan Shah, Perak. Para pelajar yang terlibat dalam kajian ini memberikan respon melalui dua instrumen kajian iaitu instrumen Participation Motivation Inventory (PMI) dan instrumen Career Decision-making Self-Efficacy Scale- Short Form (CDMSE-SF). Analisis deskriptif menunjukkan ke dua-dua konstruk motivasi dalam kalangan sampel kajian iaitu motivasi intrinsik dan motivasi ekstrinsik berada pada skala intreprasi tinggi, di mana nilai min serta nilai sisihan piawai bagi setiap konstruk adalah (Min = 3.39, SP = 0.46) bagi motivasi intrinsik, manakala (Min = 3.33, SP = 0.53) bagi motivasi ekstrinsik. Analisis inferensi melalui ujian kolerasi mempamerkan pembuktian hubungan secara statistik yang signifikan di antara dimensi motivasi dengan dimensi efikasi kendiri pemilihan kerjaya (r =0.551, p = 0.00 pada nilai signifikan p<0.01). Kajian ini merumuskan bahawa pelajar latihan industri, Politeknik Sultan Azlan Shah yang mempunyai ciri-ciri motivasi yang baik mampu mempamerkan kecenderongan efikasi kendiri pemilihan kerjaya yang baik.

Reference
  • 1. Bandura, A. (2010). Self-efficacy -Bandura. The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology, 1–3.

    2. Betz, N. E., Klein, K. L., & Taylor, K. M. (1996). Evaluation of a short form of the career decision-making self-efficacy scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 4(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/106907279600400103

    3. Betz, N. E., & Luzzo, D. A. (1996). Career assessment and the career decision-making self-efficacy scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 4(4), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/106907279600400405

    4. Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1996). A Social Cognitive Framework for Career Choice Counseling. Career Development Quarterly, 44(4), 354–366. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.1996.tb00451.x

    5. Buntat, Y., & Hassan, K. (2007). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi pemilihan kerjaya perguruan di kalangan pelajar tahun dua sarjana muda teknologi serta pendidikan, fakulti pendidikan UTM. Fakulti Pendidikan UTM, 2002.

    6. Gaylor, L., & Nicol, J. J. (2016). Experiential high school career education, self-efficacy, and motivation. Canadian Journal of Education, 39(2), 1–24.

    7. Haase, H., & Lautenschläger, A. (2011). Career Choice Motivations of University Students. International Journal of Business Administration, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijba.v2n1p2

    8. Hamzah, M. I. M., Juraime, F., & Mansor, A. N. (2016). Malaysian Principals’ Technology Leadership Practices and Curriculum Management. Creative Education, 07(07), 922–930. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.77096

    9. Harun, H. (2006). Minat, motivasi dan kemahiran mengajar guru pelatih. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 31, 83–96. https://doi.org/10.17576/JPEN-2006-%x

    10. Institute, C. D. (2017). Definitions : Career development and related roles The roles involved in career development in schools are : Managing People and Change, 4(March), 1–12. http://www.cjournal.cz/index.php?hid=clanek&cid=89%0Ahttp://www.nap.edu/catalog/13062%0Ahttps://www.wiley.com/legacy/Australia/PageProofs/BUS_MAN/3_4/c05TheHumanResourceManagementFunction-TheEmploymentCycle_WEB.pdf

    11. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

    12. Mariam, A. M., & Zanariah, D. (2015). Peranan motivasi terhadap pembentukan tingkah laku manusia. April 2015, 15–23.

    13. Mohd Izwan MahMud, Chang Peng Kee, zalInda othMan, S. aMat. (2020). Career Self-Efficacy among Undergraduate Student in a Public University. 90(Zailan 2007), 167–175.

    14. Mohd Matore, M. E. E., & Khairani, A. Z. (2014). Mengenal pasti cabaran pelajar Politeknik di Malaysia. Journal of Quality Measurement and Analysis, 10(1), 59–74.

    15. Nishanthi, H. M. (2016). Modern Career Concepts: A Review. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 6(3), 1–5. www.ijsrp.org

    16. Penny S. Visser, Jon A. Krosnick, Paul J. Lavrakas, and N. K. (2013). Chapter Sixteen: Survey Research. Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology, 404–442. https://pprg.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014-Handbook-of-Research-Methods-in-Social-Psych-Second-Edition.pdf

    17. Piaw, C. Y. (2011). Kaedah dan statistik Penyelidikan. 2(April 2011), 346.

    18. Ponto, J. (2015). Understanding and Evaluating Survey Research. Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology, 6(2), 168–16871.

    19. Wolfe, J. B., & Betz, N. E. (2004). The relationship of attachment variables to career decision-making self-efficacy and fear of commitment. Career Development Quarterly, 52(4), 363–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2004.tb00952.x

    20. Yahya, N. (2016). A Study of Motivation and Career Choice in Brunei ’ s Upper Secondary School.