Designing inter-religious dialogue model for the grassroots: A preliminary survey
List of Authors
  • Arfah Ab. Majid , Haslina Ibrahim

Keyword
  • Inter-religious dialogue, design, grassroots, prejudice

Abstract
  • In order to strengthen national unity and integration, the dialogue culture needs to be cultivated in Malaysia (Azizan Baharudin, 2008). Moreover, Malaysian society is still grounded with prejudice as this problem was never wisely dealt with (Abdul Rahman Embong, 2001). Nevertheless, the nature of current practice of inter-religious dialogue is too philosophical and theological thus the participation is limited to the elite or intellectuals. If the present model of inter-religious dialogue is meant only for the elite and not for the grassroots, how could it be the best platform for national unity and integration?. Based on this argument, an inter-religious dialogue model that is more appropriate for the grassroots need to be developed. Therefore, present research aims at exploring the nature of Malaysian society and the reality of inter-religious relations in Malaysia as an early effort to develop the inter-religious dialogue model. To achieve this goal, a survey was conducted on 426 multi-religious respondents around Klang Valley. Among the variables measured to assess the nature of Malaysian society and the reality of inter-religious relations in Malaysia were, motivation and skills in inter-religious engagement, prejudice, quantity of contact, quality of contact and inter-religious understanding. Descriptive statistical analysis was employed to determine the level of variables while inferential statistical analysis was used to assess the correlation between prejudice and selected variables (i.e. skills in inter-religious engagement and quality of contact) and correlation between skills in inter-religious engagement and quality of contact. The findings suggest that Malaysian society in general has a high level of motivation and skills in inter-religious engagement, quality of contact and inter-religious understanding. The level of prejudice and the level of quantity of contact on the other hand are recorded as low. The low level of quantity of contact however can not to be underestimated since the correlation analysis has demonstrated that contact is negatively correlated with prejudice. This correlation means low level of contact is associated with high level of prejudice while high level of contact is associated with low level of prejudice. Lack of contact among Malaysian is feared can increase prejudice. All these findings envisage the need and feasibility to implement inter-religious dialogue in Malaysia. The data in this preliminary survey will guide the researcher in determining the stages, contents, processes and specific activities related to the design of inter-religious dialogue for the grassroots.

Reference
  • 1. Abdul Rahman Embong. (2001). The Culture and practice of pluralism in post-colonial Malaysia in R. W. Hefner (ed), The politics of multiculturalism: pluralism and citizenship in Malaysia, Singapore, and Indonesia (pp. 59-87). University of Hawai’i Press

    2. Abu-Nimer, Mohammed. (2003). Nonviolence and Peace Building in Islam: Theory and practice. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.

    3. Ahmad Sunawari Long. (2003). Dialog antara agama-agama: Prasyarat persefahaman antara agama-agama [Inter-religious dialogue: Prerequisite for inter-religious understanding]. In J. Awang. (ed), Agama dan perpaduan kaum di Malaysia [Religion and racial unity in Malaysia]. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

    4. Allport, G.W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, Mass: Addison-Wesley.

    5. Baharom Mahusin. (2006). Arah hubungan kaum di Malaysia. Utusan Malaysia, 26 November.

    6. Dunbar, S. D. (1995). Christians and inter-religious dialogue: Rationale, methods and issues. University of Calgary Institutional Repository. 0612042219. Retrieved November 5, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/29900

    7. Enhancing tolerance in Malaysia. (2009). Retrieved 28 February 2010. http://www.heraldmalaysia.com/news/storydetails.php/Enhancing-Tolerance-in Malaysia/1458-1-1

    8. Jha P.K (2009): Religious Assertion in Malaysia: Constrained or Conflagrated?, Strategic Analysis, 33:6, 890-902

    9. Fletcher., C. D. (2008). Isma’il al-Faruqi (1921-1986) and inter-faith dialogue: The man, the scholar, the participant. eScholarship@McGill. 32350. Retrieved January 13, 2012. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/-?func=dbin-jumpfull&object_id =32350&silo_library=GEN01

    10. Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., & Bachman, B. A. (1996). Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The induction of a common in-group identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20 (3 & 4), 271-290. Special Issue: International Congress on Prejudice, Discrimination and Conflict, Jerusalem, Israel.

    11. Ghazali Basri (2005), Dialog antara Agama di Malaysia [Inter-religious dialogue in Malaysia]. Kuala Lumpur. Pusat Dialog Peradaban. UM

    12. Ghulam Haider Aasi. (1999). Muslim understanding of other religions: A Study Of Ibn Hazm’s Kitāb al-faÎl fī al-milal wa al-ahwā’ wa al-niÍal. Pakistan: Islamic Research Institute Press, Islamabad.

    13. Ho, A. (2005). Reviving NEP, UMNO's race card, again?. Retrieved October 27, 2012. http://cpps.org.my/resource_centre/RevivingNEP_STI_article_1.pdf

    14. Hussin Mutalib. (1990). Islam and ethnicity in Malay politics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    15. Hussin Mutalib. (1993). Islam in Malaysia: From revivalism to Islamic State. Singapore: National University of Singapore.

    16. Ismail Raji al-Faruqi. (1967). Christian ethics: A historical and systematic analysis of its dominant ideas. Montreal: McGill University Press.

    17. Ismail Raji al-Faruqi. (1992). Islam and Christianity: Diatribe or dialogue. In L. Swidler (Ed.). Muslims in dialogue: The evolution of a dialogue (pp. 1-35) Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.

    18. Kamar Oniah Kamaruzaman. (2001). Inter-faith dialogue: Moving forward; setting premises and paradigms. In Joseph A. Camilleri (ed.). Religion and culture in Asia Pacific: Violence or healing (pp. 113 – 128). Melbourne: Vista Publication.

    19. Kamaruddin M. Said. (2002). Anomie, etnisiti, jarak sosial, dan jenayah benci: Analisis sosiologikal peristiwa pergaduhan beramairamai di Petaling Jaya Selatan [Anomie, ethnicity, social distance, and hate crimes: sociological analysis of mass brawl incident in Petaling Jaya Selatan]. In Lukman Z. Mohamad (ed.). Keluarga, gender dan cabaran sosial di Malaysia [Family, gender and social challenges in Malaysia]. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications.

    20. Khairulnizam Mat Karim & Suzy Aziziyana Saili. (2012, September). The role of inter-faith dialogue in societal development: Malaysian experience. Paper presented at World Conference on Islamic Thought 2012: Contemporary Challenges and Realities organized by Kolej Universiti Islam Sultan Azlan Shah, Perak.

    21. Knitter, P. F. (1996). Jesus and the other names. Maryknoll: Orbis.

    22. Lee, H. G. (2000). Ethnic relations in Peninsular Malaysia: The cultural and economic dimensions.

    23. Mahdi Shuid & Mohd. Fauzi Yunus. (2001). Malaysian studies. Petaling Jaya: Longman

    24. Social and cultural issues. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies

    25. Martinez, P. (2008). A case-study of Malaysia: Muslim-Christian dialogue and partnership, possibilities and problems with suggestions for the future. In Simon, W. Thomas & Azizan Baharuddin (eds). Dialogue of civilizations and the construction of peace. Kuala Lumpur:Center for Civilizational Dialogue, UM.

    26. Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. (1998). Islamic-Christian dialogue-problems and obstacles to be pondered and overcome. The Muslim World, 88(3-4), 218-237.

    27. Nazri Muslim. (2012). Implikasi Peruntukan Islam dan Orang Melayu dalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan Terhadap Hubungan Etnik Di Malaysia. Kemanusiaan. 19 (2), pp. 19–62

    28. Pettigrew., T.F & Tropp., L.R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751-783.

    29. Rahimin Affandi Abd. Rahim, Mohd Anuar Ramli, Paizah Ismail & Nor Hayati Mohd Dahlal. (2011). Dialog antara agama: Realiti dan prospek di Malaysia [Religious dialogue: Its reality and prospect in Malaysia]. Kajian Malaysia, 29 (2), 91–110. Ramble, A. & Raja, J. (2009). Towards a Christian theology of dialogue communication at grassroots in a multi-religious context, Retrieved April 19, 2012. http://www.rethinkingmission.org.uk/pdfs/jointarticle09.pdf

    30. Robert Hunt. (2009). Can Muslims Engage in Interreligious Dialogue? A Study of Malay Muslim Identity in Contemporary Malaysia. The Muslim World. 99, pp.581-607

    31. Sachau, E. S. (1910). Al-Beruni’s India: an account of the religion, philosophy, literature, geography, chronology, astronomy, customs, laws and astrology of India about A.D 1030 (Vol. 1). London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. Ltd.

    32. Shahrom TM Sulaiman (2004). Dialog peradaban agama di Malaysia: Praktik dan kerelevanannya hari Ini [Religious civilizational dialogue in Malaysia: Practice and its relevancy today]. Pemikir. 37, 21-36.

    33. Sri Rahayu Ismail, Zaid Ahmad, Haslinda Abdullah & Norbaya Ahmad. (2009). The socio-psychological dimension of ethnic relations in Malaysia. European journal of social sciences. 12 (1). 76-82.

    34. Swidler, L. (1984). The dialogue decalogue: Ground rules for inter-religious dialogue. Inter-religio. 5, 30-33. Swidler, L. (1989). Religious pluralism and ecumenism from a Christian perspective. In C. Wei-hsun & G.E. Spiegler (eds.). Religious issues and inter-religious dialogues: An analysis and sourcebook of developments since 1945. (pp. 327-348) USA: Greenwood Press.

    35. Syed Husin Ali. (2008). Ethnic Relations in Malaysia: Harmony & Conflict. Petaling Jaya, Malaysia: Strategic Information and Research Development Centre (SIRD)

    36. Tan, C. K. (1985). Malaysia today: Without fear or favor. Petaling Jaya: Pelanduk Publications.

    37. Tan, S. K. (2011). Public confidence in state of ethnic relations decline. Retrieved July 22, 2012. www.merdeka.org

    38. Yong Lai Fong and Md Sidin Ahmad Ishak (2012). Framing Interethnic Conflict in Malaysia: A Comparative Analysis of Newspaper Coverage on the Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf), International Journal of Communication 6 (2012), 166 189

    39. Zaid Ahmad (2014), Kajian Isu dan Cabaran Hubungan antara Penganut Agama di Semenanjung Malaysia. Jurnal Perpaduan. 2. 35- 39