1. Acuña-Soto, C. M., Liern, V., & Pérez-Gladish, B. (2019). A VIKOR-based approach for the ranking of mathematical instructional videos. Management Decision, 57(2), 501–522. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2018-0242
2. Alguliyev, R. M. O., Aliguliyev, R. M., & Mahmudova, R. S. (2015). Multicriteria personnel selection by the modified Fuzzy VIKOR method. Scientific World Journal, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/612767
3. Berita Harian Online (2016, March 20). Kerajaan rangka dasar pendidikan tahfiz negara, PM. Retrieved (November 30, 2019), from https://www.bharian.com.my/node/135515
4. Chang, T., H. (2014). Fuzzy VIKOR method: A case study of the hospital service evaluation in Taiwan. Information Science, 196-212.
5. Harian Metro Online (2017, December 11). Cemerlang dunia akhirat. Retreived (November 30, 2019), from http://www.hmetro.com.my/nuansa/2017/12/292752/cemerlang-dunia-akhirat
6. Ju, Y., & Wang, A. (2013). Extension of VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision making problem with linguistic information. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(5), 3112–3125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.07.035
7. Liu, H. C., Liu, L., Liu, N., & Mao, L. X. (2012). Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 39, pp. 12926–12934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.031
8. Musani, S., & Jemain, A. A. (2015). Ranking schools’ academic performance using a fuzzy VIKOR. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 622(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/622/1/012036
9. Sanayei, A., Farid Mousavi, S., & Yazdankhah, A. (2010). Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.04.063
10. Siregar, D., Nurdiyanto, H., Sriadhi, S., Suita, D., Khair, U., Rahim, R., … Utama Siahaan, A. P. (2018). Multi-attribute decision making with VIKOR method for any purpose decision. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1019(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1019/1/012034
11. Wu, H. Y., Chen, J. K., Chen, I. S., & Zhuo, H. H. (2012). Ranking universities based on performance evaluation by a hybrid MCDM model. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 45(5), 856–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2012.02.009