Penyesuaian teknik pengajaran dan pembelajaran dalam matematik: Kajian literatur bersistematik
List of Authors
  • Siti Mistima Maat , Siti Nor Naqiah Jusoh

Keyword
  • impak, efikasi kendiri, keyakinan, matematik, literatur bersistematik

Abstract
  • Seiring kemajuan dunia, matematik dilihat sangat penting dalam kehidupan masa kini. Mempelajarinya bukanlah suatu yang merugikan. Namun, tidak semua memahami ilmu yang terkandung dalam subjek tersebut. Oleh yang demikian, kajian ini dilaksanakan bertujuan membuat tinjauan literatur bersistematik terhadap penyesuaian teknik pengajaran dan pembelajaran dalam matematik. Terdapat dua persoalan kajian iaitu apakah teknik pengajaran dan pembelajaran dan bagaimana teknik pengajaran dan pembelajaran dalam matematik diaplikasikan. Model yang digunakan dalam kajian ini adalah model PRISMA. Enjin carian yang digunakan dalam kajian ini adalah daripada SCOPUS dan Web of Science (WoS). Daripada 186 artikel yang ditemui, sebanyak 21 artikel diterima yang mana telah memenuhi tujuan kajian. Berdasarkan analisis yang telah dijalankan, terdapat 3 teknik pengajaran yang dapat dikenal pasti iaitu teknik pemusatan guru, teknik pemusatan bahan dan teknik pemusatan murid. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa teknik yang berpusatkan murid sesuai diaplikasikan dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran matematik. Oleh yang demikian, guru perlu berfikiran kreatif dan kritis dalam membantu murid untuk bergerak aktif dalam sesi pengajaran dan pembelajaran.

Reference
  • 1. Calkins, S., Grannan, S., & Siefken, J. (2020). Using Peer-Assisted Reflection in Math to Foster Critical Thinking and Communication Skills. Primus, 30(4), 475–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2019.1608608

    2. Chen, L., Yoshimatsu, N., Goda, Y., Okubo, F., Taniguchi, Y., Oi, M., Konomi, S., Shimada, A., Ogata, H., & Yamada, M. (2019). Direction of collaborative problem solving-based STEM learning by learning analytics approach. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-019-0119-y

    3. Feudel, F., & Dietz, H. M. (2019). Teaching study skills in mathematics service courses—how to cope with students’ refusal? Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 38(1), 20–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrx016

    4. Glogger-Frey, I., Ampatziadis, Y., Ohst, A., & Renkl, A. (2018). Future teachers’ knowledge about learning strategies: Misconcepts and knowledge-in-pieces. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.02.001

    5. Glogger-Frey, I., Deutscher, M., & Renkl, A. (2018). Student teachers’ prior knowledge as prerequisite to learn how to assess pupils’ learning strategies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.01.012

    6. Hargreaves, E., Quick, L., & Buchanan, D. (2021). Systemic threats to the growth mindset: classroom experiences of agency among children designated as ‘lower-attaining.’ Cambridge Journal of Education, 51(3), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2020.1829547

    7. Liu, Q., Du, X., Zhao, S., Liu, J., & Cai, J. (2019). The role of memorization in students’ self-reported mathematics learning: a large-scale study of Chinese eighth-grade students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(3), 361–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09576-2

    8. Lugosi, E., & Uribe, G. (2022). Active learning strategies with positive effects on students’ achievements in undergraduate mathematics education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(2), 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1773555

    9. Machaba, F. M. (2018). Pedagogical demands in mathematics and mathematical literacy: A case of mathematics and mathematical literacy teachers and facilitators. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78243

    10. Mangwende, E., & Maharaj, A. (2018). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ use of students’ learning styles when teaching functions: A case of Zimbabwean schools. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 3225–3233. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91679

    11. Meng, Q., Jia, J., & Zhang, Z. (2020). A framework of smart pedagogy based on the facilitating of high order thinking skills. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 17(3), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-11-2019-0076

    12. Misrom, K., Macdonald, B. L., & Shumway, J. F. (2020). Experiencing active mathematics learning: Meeting the expectations for teaching and learning in mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Enthusiast, 17(2–3), 615–640. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1499

    13. Misrom, N. S., Abdurrahman, M. S., Abdullah, A. H., Osman, S., Hamzah, M. H., & Fauzan, A. (2020). Enhancing students’ higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) through an inductive reasoning strategy using geogebra. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(3), 156–179. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i03.9839

    14. Pollard, V., Hains-Wesson, R., & Young, K. (2018). Creative teaching in STEM. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(2), 178–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1379487

    15. Supandi, S., Waluya, S. B., Rochmad, R., Suyitno, H., & Dewi, K. (2018). Think-talk-write model for improving students’ abilities in mathematical representation. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1136a

    16. Tassell, J. L., Stobaugh, R., & Maxwell, M. (2018). The Create Excellence Framework’s Impact on Enhancing Creativity: Examining Elementary Teacher Candidate Mathematics Lesson Planning. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72381-5_3

    17. Tsai, M. N., Liao, Y. F., Chang, Y. L., & Chen, H. C. (2020). A brainstorming flipped classroom approach for improving students’ learning performance, motivation, teacher-student interaction and creativity in a civics education class. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38(July), 100747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100747

    18. Umugiraneza, O., Bansilal, S., & North, D. (2018). Investigating teachers’ formulations of learning objectives and introductory approaches in teaching mathematics and statistics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(8), 1148–1164. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1447150

    19. Watson, G. S., & Enderson, M. C. (2018). Preparing Teachers to Use Excelets: Developing Creative Modeling Experiences for Secondary Mathematics Students. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72381-5_8

    20. Yang, K. H., & Chen, H. H. (2021). What increases learning retention: employing the prediction-observation-explanation learning strategy in digital game-based learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 0(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1944219

    21. Zhao, N., Teng, X., Li, W., Li, Y., Wang, S., Wen, H., & Yi, M. (2019). A path model for metacognition and its relation to problem-solving strategies and achievement for different tasks. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 51(4), 641–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01067-3