1. Ahmi, A., & Mohamad, R. (2019). Bibliometric Analysis of Global Scientific Literature on Web Accessibility. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering,7(6), 250–258.
2. Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. London: Routledge.
3. Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education: A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, pp. 8, 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.004.
4. Donthu, N.; Kumar, S.; Mukherjee, D.; Pandey, N.; Lim, W.M. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
5. Huang, C., Yang, C., Wang, S., Wu, W., Su, J., & Liang, C. (2019). Evolution of topics in education research: A systematic review using bibliometric analysis. Educational Review, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1566212.
6. Smith, J. K., & Smith, L. F. (2010). Educational creativity. In J. C. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 250–264). New York: D. Hernández-Torrano and L. Ibrayeva Thinking Skills and Creativity 35 (2020) 100625 Cambridge University Press.
7. Sweileh, W. M., Al-Jabi, S. W., AbuTaha, A. S., Sa'ed, H. Z., Anayah, F. M., & Sawalha, A. F. (2017). Bibliometric analysis of worldwide scientific literature in mobile health: 2006–2016. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 17(1), 72. doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0476-7
8. Isa Jahnke, Tobias Haertel & Johannes Wildt (2015). Teachers' conceptions of student creativity in higher education, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2015.1088396
9. Martí Parreño, J., Méndez Ibáñez, E., & Alonso Arroyo, A. (2016). The use of gamification in education: A bibliometric and text mining analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(6), 663–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12161
10. Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11192-015-1765-5.
11. Nissim, Yonit & Weissblueth, Eyal & Scott-Webber, Lennie & Amar, Shimon. (2016). The Effect of a Stimulating Learning Environment on Pre-Service Teachers’ Motivation and 21st Century Skills. Journal of Education and Learning. 5. 29. 10.5539/jel.v5n3p29.
12. Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., Castillo-Martínez, I. M., Sanabria-Z, J., & Miranda, J. (2022). Complex Thinking in the Framework of Education 4.0 and Open Innovation & mdash; A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 2022, Vol. 8, Page 4, 8(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/JOITMC8010004
13. Rampersad, G. & Patel, F. (2014). Creativity as a desirable graduate attribute: Implications for curriculum design and employability. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 2014, 15(1), 1-11
14. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2021). VOSviewer manual: Manual for VOSviewer version 1.6.17. Leiden University.
15. Waltman, L., Van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002
16. Wang et al., 2018 Z.H. Wang, Y.D. Zhao, B. Wang A bibliometric analysis of climate change adaptation based on massive research literature data J. Clean. Prod., 199 (2018), pp. 1072-1082
17. Wells, G. & Claxton, G. (2002). Introduction: Sociocultural Perspectives on the Future of Education. In Learning for Life in the 21st century (eds G. Wells and G. Claxton). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753545.ch1