Pelaksanaan strategi dalam pembelajaran berasaskan masalah dalam matematik: Tinjauan literatur sistematik
List of Authors
  • Ranjene Ramaya , Siti Mistima Maat

Keyword
  • pembelajaran berasaskan masalah, soalan bukan rutin, strategi, matematik, tinjauan literatur bersistematik

Abstract
  • Pembelajaran Berasaskan Masalah adalah kaedah pembelajaran yang memberi kesan positif kepada murid. Hal ini disebabkan kaedah ini tidak mempunyai satu jalan penyelesaian yang spesifik. Pemikiran kreatif dan kritis sangat penting. Tinjauan Literatur Sistematik ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti strategi penyelesaian masalah dan kepentingannya terhadap murid. Untuk kajian ini, dua pangkalan data digunakan untuk mendapatkan artikel kajian-kajian iaitu Scopus dan Web of Science. Sebanyak 34 artikel kajian dalam tempoh tahun 2018 hingga 2022 diperoleh dan dianalisis berdasarkan Model PRISMA. Kajian ini mendapati bahawa strategi perwakilan model penyelesaian masalah adalah antara strategi yang popular dan terdapat juga beberapa strategi yang kurang popular. Namun begitu, impak yang diperoleh daripada semua strategi yang dianalisis memberi impak yang positif iaitu meningkatkan skor, kemahiran berfikir secara kreatif dan kritis, meningkatkan fokus dan motivasi murid. Kesimpulannya, guru matematik perlu mengaplikasikan pelbagai strategi penyelesaian masalah matematik walaupun terdapat pelbagai kekangan.

Reference
  • 1. Anon. (2019). VN gets high scores but not named in PISA 2018 ranking. Vietnam News, 6 Disember:https://vietnamnews.vn/society/569454/vn-gets-high-scores-but-not-named-in-pisa-2018-ranking.html.

    2. Bolondi, G., Branchetti, L., & Giberti, C. (2018). A quantitative methodology for analysing the impact of the formulation of a mathematical item on students learning assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation 58, 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.05.002.

    3. Cetinkaya, L. (2019). The effects of problem based mathematics teaching through mobile applications on success. Education and Science 44(197), 65-84. DOI: 10.15390/EB.2019.8119.

    4. Cho, M. K. & Kim, M. K. (2020). Investigating elementary students’ problem solving and teacher scaffolding in solving an ill-structured problem. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST) 8(4), 274-289.

    5. Creswell, J.W. & Creswell, J.D. (2018). Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Jil 5. London: SAGE Publications, Inc.

    6. Darhim, Prabawanto, S., & Susilo, B.E. (2020). The effect of problem-based learning and mathematical problem posing in improving student’s critical thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction 13(4), 103-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1347a

    7. Fan, L., Luo, J., Xie, S., Zhu, F., & Li, S. (2022). Chinese students’ access, use and perceptions of ICTs in learning mathematics: findings from an investigation of Shanghai secondary schools. ZDM- Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01363-5.

    8. Faulkner, F., Breen, C., Prendergast, M., & Carr, M. (2021). Profiling mathematical procedural and problem-solving skills of undergraduate students following a new mathematics curriculum. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. DOI: 10.1080/0020739X.2021.1953625.

    9. Finesilver, C. (2022). Beyond Categories: dynamic qualitative analysis of visuospatial representation in arithmetic. Educational Studies in Mathematics 110, 271-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10123-3.

    10. Haavold P. O., & Sriraman, B. (2022). Creativity in problem solving: integrating two different views of insight. ZDM – Mathematics Education 54, 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01304-8.

    11. Hobri, Ummah, I.K., Yuliati, N., & Dafik. (2020). The effect of jamping task based on creative problem solving on students’ problem solving ability. International Journal of Instruction 13(1), 387-406. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13126a.

    12. Hsiao, H.S., Lin, C.Y., Chen, J.C., & Peng, Y.F. (2018). The influence of a mathematics problem-solving training system on first-year middle school students. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 14(1), 77-93. DOI: 0.12973/ejmste/77902.

    13. Hu, Y.H., Xing, J., & Tu, L.P. (2018). The effect of a problem-oriented teaching method on university mathematics learning. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science, Technology Education 14(5), 1695-1703.https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/85108.

    14. Idin, S. (2018). An overview of STEM Education and Industry 4.0. Dlm. Shelly, M & Kirau S. A (pnyt). Research Highlight in STEM Education, hlm. 194-208. Amerika Syarikat: ISRES Publishing.

    15. Kamariah Abu Bakar, Suziyani Mohamed, Fadidah Yunus & Aidah Abdul Karim. (2020). Use of multiple representations in understanding addition: the case of pre-school Children. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research 19(2), 292-304. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.2.18.

    16. Knopik, T., & Oszwa, U. (2021). E-Cooperative problem solving as a strategy for learning Mathematics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education in the Knowledge Society 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.25176 | e25176.

    17. Laurens, T., Batlolona, A., Batlolona, J.R. & Leasa, M. (2018). How does Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) improve students’ mathematics cognitive achievement? EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 14(2): 589-578. DOI: 10.12973/ejmste/76959.

    18. Leo, I,D., Muis, K.R., Singh, C.A. & Psaradellis, C. (2019). Curiousity… Confusion? Frustration! The role and sequencing of emotion during mathematics problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 121-137

    19. Lindner, M.A. (2020). Representational and decorative pictures in science and mathematics tests: do they make a difference? Learning and Instruction 68(101345). DOI:10.14201/eks.25176 | e25176.

    20. Lu, X., & Kaiser, G. (2021). Creativity in students’ modelling competencies: conceptualisation and measurement. Educational Studies in Mathematics 109, 287-311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10055-y

    21. Loc, N.P., Uyen, B.P., Tong, D.H., & Ngoi, H.T. (2020). A teaching process of fostering students’ problem solving skills: a case study of teaching the equation of a line. Universal Journal of Educational Research 8(5), 1741-1751. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2020.080510.

    22. Masduki, Muhammad Noor Kholid, Khotimah, R.P. (2020). Exploring students’ problem solving ability and response towards metacognitive strategy in mathematics learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research 8(8), 3698-3703. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2020.080849.

    23. Moallem, M., Hung, W. & Dabbagh, N. (2019). The Wiley Handbook of Problem Based Learning. Medford: Wiley & Sons Inc.

    24. Moust, J., Bouhuijs, P. & SchmidtH. (2021). Introduction to Problem-Based Learning. London: Routledge.

    25. Ndiung, S., Sariyasa, Jehadus, E., & Apsari, R.A. (2021). The effect of Treffinger creative learning model with the use RME principles on creative thinking skill and mathematics learning outcome. International Journal of Instruction 14(2), 873-888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14249a

    26. Norqvist M., Jonsson, B., Lithner, J., Qwillbard, T., & Holm, L. (2019). Investigating algorithmic and creative reasoning strategies by eye tracking. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 55, 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.03.008

    27. Palmer, H., & Bommel, J. (2020). Young students posing problem-solving tasks: what does posing a similar task imply to students? ZDM 52,743-752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01129-x

    28. Patterson, L. & Xu, Y. (2020). Enhancing teachers’ competence in building students’ numeracy in grades k-3. Frontiers in Education 5(31), 1-6. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2020.00031.

    29. Phuong, N.T., & Nguyen, P.L. (2020). Solving word problems involving “Ratio” concept of the fifth-grade students: a study in Vietnam. Universal Journal of Educational Research 8(7): 2937-2945. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2020.080722.

    30. Santia, I., Purwanto, Sutawidjadja, A., Sudirman, & Subanji. (2019). Exploring mathematical representation in solving ill-structures problems: the case of quadratic function. Journal of Mathematics Education 10(3), 365-378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.3.7600.365-378.

    31. Shaw, S.T., Luna, M.L., Rodriguex, B., Yeh, J., Villalta, N., & Ramirez, G. (2022). Mathematical creativity in elementary school children: General patterns and effects of an incubation break. Frontiers in Education 7(835911), DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2022.835911.

    32. Smith, J.M. & Mancy, R. (2018). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive and collaborative talk during group mathematical problem-solving-what do we mean by collaborative metacognition? Research in Mathematics Education 20(1),14-36. DOI: 10.1080/14794802.2017.1410215.

    33. Soboleva, E.V., Zhumakulov, K.K., Umurkulov, K.P., Ibragimov, G.I., Kochneva, L.V., & Timofeeva, M.O. (2021). Developing a personalised learning model based on interactive novels to improve the quality of mathematics education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education 18(2), 1305-8223. DOI:https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11590

    34. Son, A.L., Darhim, & Fatimah, S. (2020). Students; mathematical problem-solving ability based on teaching models intervention and cognitive style. Journal on Mathematics Education 11(2), 209-222. http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.10744.209-222.

    35. Tien, L.V., Tong, D.H., & Vy, N.T.T. (2020). Verification and control of solving pseudo-real problems related to the systems of equations. Universal Journal of Educational Research 8(8), 3351-3561. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2020.080831.

    36. Uskun, K. A., Cil, O., & Kuzu, O. (2021). The effect of realistic mathematics education on fourth graders’ problem posing/problem-solving skills and academic achievement. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education 28, 22-50. DOI: 10.14689/enad.28.2

    37. Uyangor, S.M. (2019). Investigation of the mathematical thinking processed of students in mathematics education supported with graph theory. Universal Journal of Educational Research 7(1), 1-9. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2019.070101.

    38. Uyen, B. P., Tong D.H., & Nguyen, N.H. (2021). Enhancing problem-solving skilss of 8th grade students in learning the first-degree equations in one unknown. International Journal of Education and Practice 9(3),568-587. DOI: 10.18488/journal.61.2021.93.568.587.

    39. Uyen, B.P., Tong, D.H., & Yen, L.T.N. (2020). A case study of teaching real-world problems related to exponential and logarithmic equations to develop students’ problem-solving competency. Universal Journal of Educational Research 8(11B), 6152-6165. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2020.082252

    40. Zeljic, M., Boricic, M.D., & Maricic, S. (2021). Problem solving in realistic, arithmetic/algebraic and geometric context. Education and Science 46(208): 413-430. DOI: 10.15390/EB.2021.8887. ences Journal, 14, 83-87.