Hubungan di antara penglibatan pelajar dengan prestasi akademik bagi pelajar kluster hospitaliti di Kolej Komuniti Sungai Petani
List of Authors
  • Muhd Aminuddin Bin Azizan , Reezlin Bin Abd Rahman

Keyword
  • Hospitaliti, Penglibatan Emosi, Penglibatan Kognitif, Penglibatan Tingkahlaku, Prestasi Akademik

Abstract
  • Tujuan kajian ini adalah untuk menilai hubungan antara penglibatan pelajar dari aspek emosi, kognitif dan tingkahlaku dengan prestasi akademik terhadap pelajar kluster hospitaliti di Kolej Komuniti Sungai Petani. Data yang diperoleh dari 150 responden dijalankan melalui borang soal selidik dan dianalisis menggunakan Statistik Package for Social Science (SPSS) for windows versi 21.0. Analisis deskriptif dan korelasi pearson digunakan dalam kajian ini. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahawa penglibatan pelajar terhadap pencapaian akademik berada pada tahap tinggi dan sederhana. Manakala analisis korelasi menunjukkan adanya hubungan yang signifikan antara penglibatan emosi dan penglibatan kognitif. Implikasi kajian menunjukkan bahawa aspek penglibatan emosi dan penglibatan kognitif memainkan peranan penting dalam meningkatkan prestasi akademik pelajar khususnya di Kolej Komuniti Sungai Petani.

Reference
  • 1. Afendi, A., Munir, A., & Setiawan, S. (2020). Facilitating student behavioral engagement in ESP classroom through teachers’ scaffolding talk. English Journal of Merdeka) : Culture, Language, and Teaching of English, 5(1), 41-53.

    2. Aghaziarati, A., K. K., Badayat, E., & Askari, M. (2020). The Relationship between Social Cognition and Academic Performance with The Mediating Role of Cognitive Cognitive Abilities and Academic Emotion in Students. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences (ESMS), 371-381.

    3. Ali, E., Che’ Rus, R., Haron, M. A., & Mohammad Hussain, M. A. (2018). Kebolehpasaran Graduan Pendidikan Teknikal Dan Vokasional: Satu Analisis. Sains Humanika, 10(3–3). https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v10n3-3.1510

    4. Ashwin, P., & McVitty, D. (2015). The Meanings of Student Engagement: Implications for Policies and Practices. London : National Union of Students, London, UK.

    5. Ayub, A. F., Yunus, A. S., Mahmud, R., Salim, N. R., & Sulaiman, T. (2016). Differences in Students’ Mathematics Engagement Between Gender and Between Rural and Urban Schools. 2nd International Conference and Workshop on Mathematical Analysis 2016 (ICWOMA2016), 1-6.

    6. Azhary, S. A., Supahar, Kuswanto, Ikhlas, M., & Devi, I. P. (2020). Relationship Between Behavior of Learning and Student Achievement in Physics Subject. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 1-8.

    7. Bakar, A. (2019). Technical Vocational Education & training (TVET) in Malaysia: Selected Works. In Ministry of Higher Education (Issue January, pp. 1–178). http://mycc.my/document/files/PDF Dokumen/Technical Vocational Education Training (TVET) in Malaysia Selected Works.pdf

    8. Bakar, A. R. (2015). Preparing Malaysian Youths Roles of Technical and Vocational Education and Training ( TVET ). In Universiti Putra Malaysia. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0305787930450302

    9. Bayramlar, Z., Ankarali, S., & Ankarali, H. (2022). The relationship between aerobic capacity and cognitive/academic performance in medical students. Gen Physiol Biophys, 41(6), 579-590.

    10. Chamizo-Nieto, M. T., Arrivillaga, C., Rey, L., & Extremera2, N. (2021). the role of emotional intelligence, the teacher-student relationship, and flourishing on academic performance in adolescent: a moderate meadiation study. Emotional Intelligence, Teacher-Student Relationship, and Performance, 12.

    11. Coetzee, M., Ferreira, N., & Shunmugum, C. (2017). Psychological career resources, career adaptability and work engagement of generational cohorts in the media industry. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 1(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v15i0.868

    12. De Neve, D., Bronstein, M. V., Leroy, A., Truyts, A., & Everaert, J. (2023). Emotion Regulation in the Classroom: A Network Approach to Model Relations among Emotion Regulation Difficulties, Engagement to Learn, and Relationships with Peers and Teachers. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52(2), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-022-01678-2

    13. Dubovi, I., & Tabak, I. (2021). Interactions between emotional and cognitive engagement with science on YouTube. Public Underst Science, 759-776.

    14. Dunlosky, J., K. A., E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58.

    15. Economic Planning Unit. (2015). Rancangan Malaysia Kesebelas (Eleventh Malaysia Plan) : 2016-2020. In EPU. http://rmk11.epu.gov.my/book/eng/Elevent-Malaysia-Plan/RMKe-11 Book.pdf

    16. Edwards, R. L., Davis, S. K., Hadwin, A. F., & Milford, T. M. (2020). Exploring Student Engagement Factors in a Blended Undergraduate Course. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2020.3.8293

    17. Gallup,Inc.(2013).U.S.overall:GallupStudentPollResults.1-6

    18. Gao, N., Shao, W., Rahaman, M. S., & Salim, F. D. (2020). N-Gage: Predicting in-class Emotional, Behavioural and Cognitive Engagement in the Wild. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411813

    19. Glapaththi, I., Dissanayake, R., Welgama, T., Somachandara, U., Weerarathna, R. S., & Pathirana, G. Y. (2019). A Study on the Relationship between Student Engagement and Their Academic Achievements. Asian Social Science, 15(11), 1-16.

    20. Hasnah, M., Zaidatun, T., & Baharuddin, A. (2015). Pengaruh Gaya Kognitif Terhadap Hasil Belajar Geografi. Seminar Nasional Dies …, August 2014, 11–13. http://eprints.unm.ac.id/2782/%0Ahttp://eprints.unm.ac.id/2782/1/Artikel Prosiding Seminar Nasional - Pengaruh Gaya Kognitif...pdf

    21. Hassan, R. (2019). Jenamakan TVET dengan acuan kita. Berita Harian Online.

    22. Hidayat, D., Kim, T., Listiani, T., & Setianingsih, A. R. (2019). Adolescence Student Behavioral Engagement In Mathematics Class. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 8(2), 244. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v8i2.16927

    23. Ismail, M. H. (2012). Kajian Mengenai Kebolehpasaran Siswazah di Malaysia : Tinjauan dari Perspektif Majikan Study on Employability of Graduates in Malaysia : A Survey of Employer Perspectives. Prosiding PERKEM VII, 2(2012), 906–913.

    24. Jabatan Pengajian Politeknik. (2014). Informasi Politeknik Edisi Oktober 2014. In Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

    25. Jabatan Pengajian Kolej Komuniti, Buku Panduan Kurikulum Sijil Operasi Perhotelan, 2010, pp. 2- 5.

    26. Jabatan Pengajian Kolej Komuniti, Buku Panduan Kurikulum Sijil Kulinari, 2014, pp. 2- 5.

    27. Katopola, D. A., & Otmar, B. (2016). Relationship between Behavior and College Students’ Academic Performance: The Case of the National Institute of Transport in Tanzania. Africa Journal of Technical & Vocational Education & Training, 1(1), 168-178.

    28. KPT. (2020). Pemerkasaan TVET di Malaysia Satu Tinjauan. 1–71. https://www.academia.edu/52239483/Pemerkasaan_TVET_di_Malaysia_Satu_Tinjauan

    29. Krause, K., & Coates, H. (2008). Students' engagement in first-year university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 493-505.

    30. Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the Effects of Student Engagement on First-Year College Grades and Persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 540-563.

    31. Lee, J. S. (2014). The relationship between student engagement and academic performance: Is. The Journal of Educational Research, 177–185.

    32. Lee, J., Song, H.-D., & Hong, A. J. (2019). Exploring Factors, and Indicators for Measuring Students’ Sustainable Engagement in e-Learning. Journal of Sustainability, 11(4), 985.

    33. Lotulung, M. S. D. (2023). Highschool Student Engagement in Active Learning Classrooms. Journal on Education, 5(2), 2729–2741. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i2.917

    34. Maclean, R., Jagannathan, S., & Sarvi, J. (2013). Skills Development Issues, Challenges,and Strategies in Asia and the Pacific. In Education and Skills for Inclusive Growth, Green Jobs and the Greening of Economies in Asia (pp. 3-17). Hong Kong: The Education University of Hong Kong.

    35. Marican, S. (2006). Penyelidikan Sains Sosial :Pendekatan Pragmatik. Selayang: Edusystem Sdn Bhd.

    36. Ministry of Higher Education. (2017). TVET for Human Resource Development. In Technical Vocational Education & Training (Tvet) in Malaysia : Selected Works. http://mycc.my/document/files/PDF Dokumen/Technical Vocational Education Training (TVET) in Malaysia Selected Works.pdf

    37. Mohamed, N. A., Ajis, M. N., & Zain, Z. M. (2019). Dilema majikan dalam isu menggaji pekerja tempatan atau pekerja asing di Malaysia: Perspektif majikan (Employer’s dilemma on the issues of hiring foreign workers …. Geografia-Malaysian Journal of …, 3(3), 136–147. http://ejournal.ukm.my/gmjss/article/view/32220/0

    38. Mohd Azri, A., Sahid, S., & A. Hamid, A. H. (2019). Meningkatkan Kebolehpasaran Graduan Melalui Kemahiran Kebolehgajian. Journal of Global Business and Social Entrepreneurship, 5(15), 21–34.

    39. Morales, R., Ortiz, F. J., Ramirez, N. G., Fangmeyer, J., & Menéndez, A. M. (2019). Research Path that Improves Student Engagement. Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 141-151.

    40. Nesayan, A., Amani, M., & Gandomani, R. A. (2017). Cognitive Profile of Children and its Relationship With Academic Performance. Basic and Clinical neuroscience, 10(2), 165-174.

    41. Norliza Mohd Zain, V. A. (2017). Challenges and Evolution of Higher Education in Malaysia. International Journal of Islamic and Civilizational Studies, 78-87.

    42. Nor Yuzie Yusuf, Rosini Abu, & Aida Suraya Md Yunus. (2014). Tingkah Laku, Emosi dan Kognitif Murid sebagai Faktor Peramal Pencapaian Akademik. Journal of Human Capital Development, 7(1), 1–20.

    43. Olipas, C. N., & Cochanco, R. A. (2021). The information technology Students’ cognitive determinants and its relationship to academic performance. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research, 8(3), 381-389.

    44. Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS Survival Manual (6th editio). McGraw Hill education.

    45. Piaw, C. Y. (2011). Kaedah dan statistik Penyelidikan. 2(April 2011), 346.

    46. Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002

    47. RMK11. (2015). Rancangan Malaysia Kesebelas 2016-2020. Rancangan Malaysia Kesebelas (Eleventh Malaysia Plan) : 2016-2020, 191–233. http://rmk11.epu.gov.my/book/eng/Elevent-Malaysia-Plan/RMKe-11 Book.pdf

    48. Rowntree, D. (1981). Statistics Without Tears: A Primer for non-Mathematicians. London: Penguin

    49. Said, M. A., Idris, M., & Hussain, S. (2018). Relationship between Social Behaviour and Academic Performance of Students at Secondary Level in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Pakistan Journal of Distance & Online Learning, 4(1), 153-170.

    50. Shebailo, N. S., Vahedi, S., & Nemati, S. (2019). The Relationships between Emotions of Students, Teachers and Parents and Academic Performance in Science Course. Quarterly Journal of Child Mental Health, 6(1), 188- 199.

    51. Sukor, R., A. F., N. K., & Halim, F. A. (2021). Relationship Between Students’ Engagement with Academic Performance Among Non-Food Science Students Enrolled in Food Science Course. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(4), 638-648.

    52. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. Illinois, USA: John Wiley & Sons.