Effects of the attributes of school management teams on the management of quality education: towards school effectiveness
List of Authors
  • Israel, Kariyana

Keyword
  • Management, quality of education, school management teams, South African schools

Abstract
  • This study, which was part of a larger study, adopted a convergent parallel research design to ascertain attributes of school management team (SMT) members as determinants of education quality. Participants were 60 SMT members randomly sampled from the 20 participating schools. Questionnaire reliability and validation were respectively determined by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and through a pilot study. Quantitative data were descriptive statistically analysed using SPSS version 22 and qualitative data through content analysis. The study found that SMTs were aware that there were legislation mandates that guide the management of quality education but viewed schools as not utilising such mandates. SMTs also viewed schools as having clear vision and mission statements which they neither displayed nor implement. Most factors that support high-quality education were missing in schools. Participants believed that holding SMTs responsible for subpar school performance and performance measurement and monitoring were necessary prerequisites for the provision and administration of high-quality education. Recommendations included mandating SMTs to effectively manage each school's physical and human resources in accordance with legislative requirements.

Reference
  • 1. Altmaier, E. M. (2011). Best practices in counseling grief and loss: finding benefit from trauma. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 33(1), 33+.
    2. Branch, G. F., Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2013). School leaders matter: Measuring the impact of effective principals. Education Next, 13(1), 62–69.
    3. Brauckmann, S., & Schwarz, A. (2014). Autonomous leadership and a centralised school system: An odd couple? Empirical insights from Cyprus. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(7), 823–841.
    4. Bush, T. (2003). Theories of Educational Management (3rd ed.).
    5. Sage. Chapman, J. (1993). Leadership, school-based decision-making and school effectiveness. In C. Dimmock (Ed.), School-based management and school effectiveness (pp. 201– 218). Routledge.
    6. Creswell, J. W. (2004). Educational research. planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
    7. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Sage.
    8. Davis, S., Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., & Meyerson, D. (2005). Review of research. school leadership study: Developing successful principals. Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.
    9. Davies, B. J., & Davies, B. (2006). Developing a model for strategic leadership in schools. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 34(1), 121–139.
    10. Deming, W. E. (1988). Out of crisis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
    11. Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge University Press. In R.O. Oduwaiye, A.O. Sofoluwe and D.J. Kayode 2012. Total quality management and students’ academic performance in Ilorin Metropolis secondary schools, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Management Sciences and Education, 1(1), 141 – 152.
    12. Department of Basic Education. (2011a). Delivery Agreement for Outcome 1: Improved quality of basic education. Government Printer. Department of Basic Education. (2011b). Enhancing the status of the teaching profession for the delivery of quality education. International Forum for Teaching Regulatory Authorities (IFTRA), 8-11 July 2011, Durban.
    13. Eacott, S. (2007). Strategy and the practising educational leader. In T d’Arbon (Ed.), Directions for Catholic Educational Leadership in the 21st Century: The vision, challenges and reality. Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Catholic Education Leadership, 29 July – 1 August, Sydney, New South Wales: Flagship for Creative and Authentic Leadership.
    14. Elmore, R. F. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Albert Shanker Institute.
    15. Farah, A. I. (2013). School management: Characteristics of effective principal. International Journal of Advancements in Research & Technology, 2(10), 168-173.
    16. Hanushek, E. A., & Wößmann, L. (2007). Education quality and economic growth. The World Bank.
    17. Jagathesan, N. (1999). The role of the school management team in promoting a culture of teaching and learning [Master’s Thesis, University of Zululand].
    18. Jaquiss, N. (1999). A matter of principals. Willamette Week. http://www.wweek.com/html/education111099.html
    19. Krasnoff, B. (2015). Leadership qualities of effective principals: Research brief. Northwest Comprehensive Center.
    20. Leithwood, K. (2005). Understanding successful principal leadership: Progress on a broken front. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6), 619 – 629.
    21. Leithwood, K., Seashore-Louise, K., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning: A review of research for the Learning from Leadership Project. The Wallace Foundation.
    22. Levine, A. (2005). Educating school leaders. The Education Schools Project.
    23. Liston, C. (1999). Managing quality and standards. Open University Press.
    24. Mestry, R. (2016). The management of user fees and other fundraising initiatives in self-managing public schools. South African Journal of Education, 36(2), 1-11.
    25. Morse, J. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40, 120 – 123.
    26. Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H., 1994. Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
    27. Oduwaiye, R. O., Sofoluwe, A. O., & Kayode, D. J. (2012). Total quality management and students’ academic performance in Ilorin Metropolis secondary schools, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Management Sciences and Education, 1(1), 141 – 152.
    28. Peterson, K. D. (2002). The professional development of principals: Innovations and opportunities. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 213 – 232.
    29. Plant, Y. A., Addysg, & Sgiliau, D. G. O. (2008). Education for sustainable development and global citizenship: A common understanding for schools. Welsh Assembly Government.
    30. Province of the Eastern Cape Department of Education. (2009). Learner attainment improvement strategy: Master plan for total learner performance and school management 2010. Province of the Eastern Cape Department of Education.
    31. Schildkamp, K., Visscher, A., & Luyten, H. (2009). The effects of the use of a school self-evaluation instrument. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(1), 69 – 88.
    32. Shumba, J. (2011). Secondary school children’s experiences of bereavement: Implications for School Counselling in Harare Metropolitan Province [Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Fort Hare].
    33. Singh, V., Grover, S., & Kumar, A. (2008). Evaluation of quality in an educational institute: A quality function deployment approach. Educational Research and Review, 3(4), 162 – 168.
    34. Steyn, P. G. (2001). Managing organisations through projects and programmes: The modern general management approach. Management Today, 17(3).
    35. Taşar, H. H., & Çelik, M. (2011). Examination of implementation level of the total quality management principles by the principals and teachers functioning at elementary schools: The case of adiyaman province. Asian Social Science, 7(9), 33–42.
    36. Van Der Voort, G., & Wood, L. (2016). An action-learning model to assist circuit teams to support school management teams towards whole-school development. South African Journal of Education, 36(4). SciELO SA. http://dx.doi.org/10.15700/saje.v36n4a1327
    37. Waters, T., Marzano, R. J., & McNulty, B. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 yearsof research tells us about the effect of leadership on pupil achievement. A working paper. Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
    38. Young, M. D. (2002, February 7-8). Ensuring the university’s capacity to prepare learning-focused leadership [Report]. National Commission for the Advancement of Educational Leadership.