Interactive learning environment through visualization to promote creative thinking among non-major undergraduate computer science students learning computer programming subject
List of Authors
  • Norah Md Noor , Nurul Artika Zambri

Keyword
  • Creative thinking, 21st century learning, competencies

Abstract
  • This study aimed to investigate whether the experience of learning using a visual interactive learning environment through visualization impacts performance and dimensions of creative potential in terms of creative thinking. Sixteen (16) non-random non-major undergraduate computer science students learning computer programming subjects were exposed to a visual interactive learning environment through visualization in a pre-experimental single group pre-posttest research design. Before and after participants learn using visual interactive learning environment through visualization for six (6) weeks, they must complete three Visual tests and two verbal tasks of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. The study showed significant evidence that the performance and creative level of the students are better after learning using a visual interactive learning environment except for Verbal Fluency and Verbal Flexibility dimensions of Creative thinking. Implications of these findings for future research are discussed.

Reference
  • 1. Abegglen, S., Burns, T., & Sinfield, S. (2018). Drawing as a Way of Knowing : Visual Practices as the Route to Becoming Academic. 28.

    2. Albert, D., Nussbaumer, A., & Steiner, C. M. (2010). Towards generic visualization tools and techniques for adaptive e-learning. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computers in Education ICCE (Vol. 2010).

    3. Bouchard, J. (2013). Design thinking: exploring creativity in higher education. Michigan State University, Environmental Design.

    4. Fan, M. & Cai, W. (2022). How does a creative learning environment foster student creativity? An examination on multiple explanatory mechanisms. Curr Psychol 41, 4667–4676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00974-z

    5. Fraser, N. (2013). Blockly: A visual programming editor, URL https. code. google. com/p/blockly, 42, 2013.

    6. Hicks, K. L. (2018). What is the nature of creativity: Understanding the role of executive and associative processes in creative thinking (Doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology).

    7. Lucas, B., Claxton, G., & Spencer, E. (2013). Progression in Student Creativity in School: First Steps Towards New Forms of Formative Assessments. OECD Education Working Papers, 86(86), 45. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k4dp59msdwk-en

    8. Murdock, M. C., & Keller-Mathers, S. (2008). Teaching and learning creatively with the Torrance Incubation Model: A research and practice update. The international journal of creativity & problem solving, 18(2), 11-33.

    9. Ong, E. W., Pizziconi, V. B., & Ramakrishna, B. L. (2000). Interactive Nano-Visualization for Science And Engineering Education. 21, 27–40.

    10. Resnick, Mitchel, John Maloney, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, Natalie Rusk, Evelyn Eastmond, Karen Brennan, Amon Millner et al. (2009): "Scratch: programming for all." Communications of the ACM 52, no.11 60-67.

    11. Schweitzer, D., & Brown, W. (2007, March). Interactive visualization for the active learning classroom. In Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 208-212).

    12. Smith, J. M. (2012). The beyonder app: designing a website and a mobile application for teachers to integrate the Torrance Incubation Model into classroom content.

    13. Sternberg, R. J., & Sternberg, R. J. (2010). The Nature of Creativity The Nature of Creativity. 0419(2006). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801

    14. Studente, Sylvie., Seppala, Nina., & Sadowska, Noemi.(2016), Facilitating creative thinking in the classroom: Investigating the effects of plants and the colour green on visual and verbal creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.09.001

    15. Wong, K. Y. (2017). Designs of Open and Distance Learning ( ODL ) Education : Case of Malaysia Industry-Focused Doctoral Studies. 5(2), 14–19.

    16. Yarbrough, Nükhet D. (2016) Assessment of Creative Thinking Across Cultures Using the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT): Translation and Validity Issues, Creativity Research Journal, 28:2, 154-164, DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2016.1162571

    17. Yeh, Y.-C., Yeh, Y.-L., & Chen, Y.-H. (2012). From knowledge sharing to knowledge creation: A blended knowledge-management model for improving university students’ creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(3), 245–257.