The impact of sustainability advertising on the purchase intention of Indonesian consumers
List of Authors
  • Kimberlee Landrea Manurung

Keyword
  • Sustainable Fashion, Sustainability Advertising, Consumer Perceptions, Purchase Behaviors, Mixed Method Approach

Abstract
  • This study delves into the increasing demand for sustainable fashion products due to the fashion industry's negative environmental impact. However, limited knowledge exists regarding consumer perceptions and purchase behaviors concerning sustainability in fashion. Employing a mixed-methods approach, this research investigates the influence of sustainability advertising on consumer perceptions and purchase behaviors regarding sustainable fashion products. To achieve this, expert interviews were conducted with a purposively selected sample, complemented by a survey questionnaire with a larger group of participants. The results indicate that sustainability advertising has a positive impact on consumer perceptions of sustainable fashion products. Consumers exhibit heightened awareness of the environmental consequences of the fashion industry, leading them to seek more sustainable alternatives. Credible, informative, and value-aligned sustainability advertising has a more significant influence on consumers. Regarding purchase behaviors, the relationship is more intricate. Various factors emerged that can further shape consumer perceptions and behaviors in sustainable fashion, including the individual's level of environmental awareness, personal values, social norms, and perceived price premium of sustainable products. These findings carry significant implications for both brands and consumers. This study provides valuable interdisciplinary insights into the intricate dynamics of sustainability advertising's impact on consumer perceptions and purchase behaviors in a sustainable fashion. It identifies critical factors influencing consumer decision-making and highlights the potential of credible sustainability advertising to drive sustainable fashion consumption. Armed with these insights, brands can design more effective sustainability advertising campaigns, while consumers can make informed choices, contributing to a more sustainable future for the fashion industry.

Reference
  • 1. Creyer, E. H. (1997a). The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: Do consumers really care about business ethics? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14(6), 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363769710185999

    2. Henninger, C. E., Niinimäki, K., Blazquez, M., & Jones, C. (2022). Sustainable fashion. In Sustainable Fashion Management (pp. 25–48). Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003097846-3

    3. Kumar, N., Garg, P., & Singh, S. (2022). Pro-environmental purchase intention towards eco-friendly apparel: Augmenting the theory of planned behavior with perceived consumer effectiveness and environmental concern. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 13(2), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2021.2016062

    4. Lavan, N., & Kennedy, F. (2017). Green purchase intention on consumer decision making towards green products. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 5(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2017/36563

    5. Ottman, J. A., Stafford, E. R., & Hartman, C. L. (2006). Avoiding green marketing myopia: Ways to improve consumer appeal for environmentally preferable products. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 48(5), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.3200/envt.48.5.22-36

    6. Sheridan, M., Moore, C., & Nobbs, K. (2006). Fast fashion requires fast marketing. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 10(3), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1108/13612020610679286

    7. Thøgersen, J. (2006). Norms for environmentally responsible behavior: An extended taxonomy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(4), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.09.004

    8. Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude – behavioral intention” gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19(2), 169–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3