Occupant needs for neighborhood outdoor spaces based on Maslow's hierarchy of needs: Evidence from Wuxi, China
List of Authors
  • Faziawati Abdul Aziz , Jing Zhao

Keyword
  • Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, Neighborhood, Outdoor Space, Well-Being

Abstract
  • This study investigates the correlation between the needs of residents in Wuxi, China, and the provision of neighborhood outdoor spaces, through the lens of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. The objective is to discern and comprehend the distinct needs residents have for outdoor spaces across various tiers of Maslow's hierarchy, encompassing physiological, safety, love/belonging, esteem, and self-actualization. This study utilizes quantitative research methods, integrating data obtained from a survey of 372 residents to acquire insights into their perspectives on outdoor spaces. The findings reveal that, at the physiological level, residents place a premium on access to clean and verdant spaces for relaxation and exercise. From a safety perspective, the availability of well-lit, secure, and meticulously maintained outdoor settings is deemed essential. In terms of love and belonging, environments that encourage neighborhood interaction and foster social bonds, such as playgrounds and community gardens, are highly valued. Regarding esteem, spaces that are aesthetically appealing and bolster local identity and pride hold significant importance. Finally, concerning self-actualization, areas that provide avenues for personal development and engagement with the environment, including educational workshops and neighborhood vegetable gardens, are in demand. The study underscores the necessity of adopting a holistic approach to urban planning that accounts for the multifaceted needs of residents at different levels of Maslow’s hierarchy. The insights garnered from Wuxi, China, suggest that satisfying these varied needs is pivotal to enhancing the overall well-being and contentment of residents with their community outdoor spaces. This research offers critical perspectives for urban planners, landscape architects, and policymakers dedicated to fostering more habitable, sustainable, and needs-focused outdoor environments in urban settings.

Reference
  • 1. Al Mughairi, M., Beach, T., & Rezgui, Y. (2023). Post-occupancy evaluation for enhancing building performance and automation deployment. Journal of Building Engineering, 77, 107388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107388

    2. Ayala-Azcárraga, C., Diaz, D., & Zambrano, L. (2019). Characteristics of urban parks and their relation to user well-being. Landscape and Urban Planning, 189, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.04.005

    3. Ayodeji, A., & Amole, O. (2022). Open spaces and wellbeing: The impact of outdoor environments in promoting health. Cities & Health, 6, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2021.2011537

    4. Bao, T., Li, X., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., & Tian, S. (2016). Assessing the Distribution of Urban Green Spaces and its Anisotropic Cooling Distance on Urban Heat Island Pattern in Baotou, China. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi5020012

    5. Baschera, W. L., & Hahn, I. S. (2022). Can sustainable urban planning determine people’s happiness and well-being? Revista de Administração Da UFSM, 15, 781–796. https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465969433

    6. Bavaresco, M. V., D’Oca, S., Ghisi, E., & Lamberts, R. (2020). Methods used in social sciences that suit energy research: A literature review on qualitative methods to assess the human dimension of energy use in buildings. Energy and Buildings, 209, 109702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109702

    7. Bustamante, G., Guzman, V., Kobayashi, L. C., & Finlay, J. (2022). Mental health and well-being in times of COVID-19: A mixed-methods study of the role of neighborhood parks, outdoor spaces, and nature among US older adults. Health & Place, 76, 102813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102813

    8. Cloutier, S., Berejnoi, E., Russell, S., Ann Morrison, B., & Ross, A. (2018). Toward a holistic sustainable and happy neighborhood development assessment tool: A critical review of relevant literature. Ecological Indicators, 89, 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.01.055

    9. Colclough, S., Hegarty, R. O., Murray, M., Lennon, D., Rieux, E., Colclough, M., & Kinnane, O. (2022). Post occupancy evaluation of 12 retrofit nZEB dwellings: The impact of occupants and high in-use interior temperatures on the predictive accuracy of the nZEB energy standard. Energy and Buildings, 254, 111563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111563

    10. Cranz, G., & Young, C. (2006). The Role of Design in Inhibiting or Promoting Use of Common Open Space. Journal of Housing For the Elderly, 19(3–4), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1300/J081v19n03_05

    11. Fu, X. (2024). Intention-to-use low-carbon travel modes—An investigation integrating Maslow’s hierarchy of (driving) needs and the theory of planned behavior. Sustainable Cities and Society, 101, 105187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105187

    12. Geng, D. (Christina), Innes, J., Wu, W., & Wang, G. (2021). Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on urban park visitation: A global analysis. Journal of Forestry Research, 32(2), 553–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-020-01249-w

    13. Göçer, Ö., Göçer, K., Başol, A. M., Kıraç, M. F., Özbil, A., Bakovic, M., Siddiqui, F. P., & Özcan, B. (2018). Introduction of a spatio-temporal mapping based POE method for outdoor spaces: Suburban university campus as a case study. Building and Environment, 145, 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.012

    14. Groshong, L., Wilhelm Stanis, S. A., Kaczynski, A. T., & Hipp, J. A. (2020). Attitudes About Perceived Park Safety Among Residents in Low-Income and High Minority Kansas City, Missouri, Neighborhoods. Environment and Behavior, 52(6), 639–665. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518814291

    15. Jia, M., Srinivasan, R. S., & Raheem, A. A. (2017). From occupancy to occupant behavior: An analytical survey of data acquisition technologies, modeling methodologies and simulation coupling mechanisms for building energy efficiency. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, 525–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.011

    16. Jim, C. Y., & Chen, W. Y. (2006). Recreation–amenity use and contingent valuation of urban greenspaces in Guangzhou, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.08.008

    17. Kim, S., & Park, C. S. (2023). Quantification of occupant response to influencing factors of window adjustment behavior using explainable AI. Energy and Buildings, 296, 113349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113349

    18. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346

    19. Maslow, A. H. (1958). A Dynamic Theory of Human Motivation. In Understanding human motivation (pp. 26–47). Howard Allen Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1037/11305-004

    20. Mouratidis, K., & Yiannakou, A. (2022). COVID-19 and urban planning: Built environment, health, and well-being in Greek cities before and during the pandemic. Cities, 121, 103491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103491

    21. Oriol, X., Miranda, R., & Unanue, J. (2020). Bullying victimization at school and subjective well-being in early and late Peruvian adolescents in residential care: The contribution of satisfaction with microsystem domains. Children and Youth Services Review, 109, 104685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104685

    22. Pouso, S., Borja, Á., Fleming, L. E., Gómez-Baggethun, E., White, M. P., & Uyarra, M. C. (2021). Contact with blue-green spaces during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown beneficial for mental health. Science of the Total Environment, 756. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143984

    23. Rojas, M., Méndez, A., & Watkins-Fassler, K. (2023). The hierarchy of needs empirical examination of Maslow’s theory and lessons for development. World Development, 165, 106185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106185

    24. Shawesh, R., & Mohamed, M. (2021). Post-occupancy evaluation of outdoor thermal comfort in hot arid zone. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 16(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/ctaa035

    25. Soga, M., Evans, M. J., Tsuchiya, K., & Fukano, Y. (2021). A room with a green view: The importance of nearby nature for mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ecological Applications, 31(2). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2248

    26. Vassiliades, C., Savvides, A., & Buonomano, A. (2022). Building integration of active solar energy systems for façades renovation in the urban fabric: Effects on the thermal comfort in outdoor public spaces in Naples and Thessaloniki. Renewable Energy, 190, 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.094

    27. Xiao, Y., Piao, Y., Wei, W., Pan, C., Lee, D., & Zhao, B. (2023). A comprehensive framework of cooling effect-accessibility-urban development to assessing and planning park cooling services. Sustainable Cities and Society, 104817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104817