Teacher’s acceptance and readiness in implementing Zero Reject Policy (ZRP) in rural school in Malaysia
List of Authors
  • Mohd Isa Hamzah , Nur Kamariah Ensimau Abdullah

Keyword
  • Zero Reject Policy, readiness, acceptance, SEN, rural school

Abstract
  • The Zero Reject Policy (ZRP) was policy introduced by Ministery of Education in Malaysia, December 2018 purposely to adhance the implementation of Education for All Policy in Malaysia. Through this policy Special Education Need (SEN) students were give an opportunity to study in mainstream classes without any rejection. Therefore, this pilot study aims is to identify the level of teacher’s acceptance and readiness among mainstreams teachers in implenting ZRP spesifically in rural school in Malaysia. This quantitative studies involved 120 mainstream teachers whose randomly selected in Kapit, Sarawak. The questionare distributed randomly in 43 primary school teachers in Kapit District and the data analyzed using SPSS V23. The research findings indicated that the level of teachers acceptance and readiness bothly in the moderate level. The top down policy making encougare teachers readiness in implement any new policy. However, the level of readiness also influence by level of acceptance of teachers. Therefore, more exposure about ZRP thru courses and workshop should conducted in order to increase teachers acceptances and readiness to implement ZRP in rural school.

Reference
  • 1. Abdullah, N.A, Abdul, M.R & Bari, S. (2018). Early Intervention of Special Education, Theory and Practice. Penerbit UKM, ISBN 978-967-2388-39.
    2. Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy 6(1): 7–16. https:// doi:10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587.
    3. Alquraini, T. A. & Rao, S. M. (2020). Assessing teachers’ knowledge, readiness, and needs to implement Universal Design for Learning in classrooms in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Inclusive Education 24(1): 103–114. http://doi:10.1080/13603116.2018.1452298.
    4. Bruggink, M., Goei, S. L. & Koot, H. M. (2016). Teachers’ capacities to meet students’ additional support needs in mainstream primary education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 22(4): 448–460. doi:10.1080/13540602.2015.1082727.
    5. Campbell, C., A. Lieberman, A. Yashkina, with S. Alexander, and J. Rodway. (2018). Teacher Learning and Leadership Program: Research Report 2017–18. Toronto, Canada: Ontario Teachers’ Federation.
    6. Datnow, A., and V. Park. (2018). Professional Collaboration with Purpose: Teacher Learning Towards Equitable and Excellent Schools. New York: Routledge.
    7. Department of Education. (2005). Guidelines for Inclusive Learning Programmes Your Constructive Inputs to These Draft Guidelines Will Be (June): 1–115.
    8. Donohoo, J. (2018). Collective Teacher Efficacy Research: Productive Patterns of Behaviour and Other Positive Consequences. Journal of Educational Change 19(3): 323–345.
    9. Education Act (1996). (Act 550) & Selected Regulations.1998. Kuala Lumpur: International Law Books.
    10. Ghanizadeh, A., M.J. Bahredar, and S. R. Moeini. (2006). Knowledge and attitudes towards attention deficit hyperactivity disorder among elementary school teachers. Patient Education and Counselling, 63(1- 2): 84-88. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.09.002.
    11. Hargreaves, A., and M. Ainscow. (2015). The top and Bottom of Leadership and Change. Phi Delta Kappan 97(3): 42–48.
    12. Harris, A., M. Jones, and J. Huffman. (2017). Teachers Leading Educational Reform: The Power of Professional Learning Communities. London: Routledge.
    13. Kaushik, B. (2018). Zero rejection policy in admission of children with special needs – Myth or reality. Disability, CBR and Inclusive Development 29(2): 118–127. doi:10.5463/DCID.v29i2.690.
    14. Kurniawati, F., A. Minnaert, F. Mangunsong, and W. Ahmed. (2012). Empirical study on primary school teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education in Jakarta, Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 69(1): 1430-1436. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.082.
    15. Lawrence- Brown, D. (2004). Differentiated instruction: Inclusive strategies for standards- based learning that benefit the whole Class. American Secondary Education. 32, 34 – 63.
    16. Lessard, A., Fortin, L., Butler-Kisber, L. & Marcotte, D. (2014). Analyzing the discourse of dropouts and resilient students. Journal of Educational Research 107(2) 103–110 doi:10.1080/00220671.2012.753857.
    17. Liyana Ahmad Afip, N. F. H. & K. Z. (2013). Perceptions and Experiences of Special Education Teachers in Dealing with Dyslexia Problems in Literacy Skills. School of Languages, 1–14.
    18. Lynch, S. & Adams, P. (2008). Developing standards-based individualized education program objectives for students with significant needs. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(3), 36–39. doi:10.1177/004005990804000303.
    19. MacAllister, J. & Riddell, S. (2019). Realising the educational rights of children with special and additional support needs: paradigm change or more of the same? International Journal of Inclusive Education 23(5): 469–472. doi:10.1080/13603116.2019.1580927.
    20. Malaysia Education Ministry. (2013). Education Development Master Plan (PIPP). Kuala Lumpur: Education Policy Planning and Research Division, Ministry of Education Malaysia.
    21. Malaysia Education Ministry. (2019). The concept of inclusive education programs. Ministry of Education Malaysia Malaysia, M. O. E. (2018). Quick Facts 2018. Miniistry of Education, Malaysia 1–48. Retrieved from https://www.mdanderson.org/documents/about-md-anderson/about-us/facts-and-history/quick-facts.pdf.
    22. Maulana, R., Helms-Lorenz, M. & van de Grift, W. (2015). Development and evaluation of a questionnaire measuring pre-service teachers’ teaching behaviour: A Rasch modelling approach. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 26(2): 169–194. doi:10.1080/09243453.2014.939198.
    23. Miles, S. & Singal, N. (2010). The Education for All and inclusive education debate: Conflict, contradiction or opportunity? International Journal of Inclusive Education 14(1):1–15 doi:10.1080/13603110802265125.
    24. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2018). Annual Report 2018: Malaysia Education Development Plan 2013- 2025. Ministry of Education Malaysia 1–96. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.my/en/muat-turun/penerbitan-dan-jurnal/pppm-2013-2025-pendidikan-prasekolah-hingga-lepas-menengah/laporan-tahunan-2018/3283-laporan-tahunan-bm/file.
    25. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2019). Quick Facts 2019: Malaysia Educational Statistics. Ministry of Education, Malaysia 1–48. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.my/en/penerbitan/1587-quick-facts-2018-malaysia-educational-statistics-1/file.
    26. Ministry of Education, M. (2018). Professional Circular Letter Number 4 Year 2018 - Guidelines for Managing Students At Risk Of Dropping Out Of School. Retrieved from www.moe.gov.my.
    27. Mohamed, G., de Lange, N. & Bezuidenhout, F. J. (2018). Quality Education for All Using a Generic Mentoring Framework. South African Review of Sociology 49(3–4): 55–77. doi:10.1080/21528586.2018.1550668.
    28. Molosiwa, A. & Boikhutso, K. (2016). Low educational participation of marginalised children in Botswana’s rural and remote schools: Interface between cultural, structural and institutional factors. Africa Education Review 13(2): 48–63. doi:10.1080/18146627.2016.1224097.
    29. Mughal, A. W. & Aldridge, J. (2017). Head Teachers’ Perspectives on School Drop-Out in Secondary Schools in Rural Punjab, Pakistan. Educational Studies 53(4): 359–376. doi:10.1080/00131946.2017.1307196.
    30. Netolicky, D. M., J. Andrews, and C. Paterson, eds. (2018). Flip the System Australia: What Matters in Education. New York: Routledge.
    31. Rycroft-Smith, L., and J. L. Dutaut. (2018). Flip the System UK: A Teachers’ Manifesto. Abingdon: Routledge
    32. Salend, S. J. (2005). Report Card Models That Support Communication and Differentiation of Instruction. Teacher Development, 37, 28–34
    33. Sekaran. (2013). Research methods for business; A skill building approach. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
    34. Sharma, U. & Deppeler, J. (2012). Variables affecting teachers ’ intentions to include students with disabilities in regular primary schools in Bangladesh (October): 37–41. doi:10.1080/09687599
    35. Sharratt, L. (2018). Clarity: What Matters Most in Learning, Teaching, and Leading. California: Corwin Press
    36. Shyamani, H, Ajac, S.C. (2013) Perceptions of ‘inclusion’ and perceived preparedness among school teachers in Sri Lanka Teaching and Teacher Education Volume 43, October 2014, Pages 143-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.07.003
    37. Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: ASCD World Conference on Education for All. (1991). World Leisure & Recreation 33(2): 43–44. doi:10.1080/10261133.1991.9673767
    38. World Vision UK, (2007). Education’s Missing Millions: Including Disabled Children through EFA FTI Processes and National Sector Plan. World Vision UK, Milton Keynes.
    39. Yazeed Alnasser. (2022) Perceptions of Saudi elementary and middle middle school special education teachers of the concept of teacher leadership. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2022.2053359
    40. Zalizan & Noraini Mohd. Salleh. (2000). Inclusive Education: A Change in the Paradigm of Education. Report of the National Level Special Education Seminar 2000. Aminudin Baki Institute. 11 - 14 Jun 2000, p. 85 – 106.
    41. Zuki, N. H. M. & Rahman, N. S. N. A. (2016). Challenges Malaysian teachers face in the inclusion of autistic students in the normal classroom. 2015 4th International Conference on Advanced Computer Science Applications and Technologies (ACSAT) 4(2006): 120–130. Retrieved from http://irep.iium.edu.my/52058