1. 10-10 Malaysian science, technology, innovation and economy (MySTIE) framework. (2020, December 8). Retrieved February 17, 2022, from Academy of Sciences Malaysia. https://www.akademisains.gov.my/10-10-mystie/
2. Ahmad, A. N., Ungku Zainal Abidin, U. F., Othman, M., & Abdul Rahman, R. (2018). Overview of the halal food control system in Malaysia. Food Control, 90, 352–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.02.035
3. Ali, A., Shah, G. A., Farooq, M. O., & Ghani, U. (2017). Technologies and challenges in developing Machine-to-Machine applications: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 83, 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2017.02.002
4. American Society for Quality [ASQ]. (2023). Failure mode and effects analysis. https://asq.org/quality-resources/fmea
5. Batubara, F. R., Ubacht, J., & Janssen, M. (2018). Challenges of blockchain technology adoption for e-government: A systematic literature review. Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age. New York, NY, USA: ACM.
6. Berg, K. A., Bender, A. E., Evans, K. E., Holmes, M. R., Davis, A. P., Scaggs, A. L., & King, J. A. (2020). Service needs of children exposed to domestic violence: Qualitative findings from a statewide survey of domestic violence agencies. Children and Youth Services Review, 118(105414), 105414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105414
7. Cai, W., Wang, Z., Ernst, J. B., Hong, Z., Feng, C., & Leung, V. C. M. (2018). Decentralized applications: The blockchain-empowered software system. IEEE Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 6, 53019–53033. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2870644
8. Dworkin, S. L. (2012). Sample size policy for qualitative studies using in-depth interviews. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(6), 1319–1320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-0016-6
9. Elghaish, F., Hosseini, M. R., Matarneh, S., Talebi, S., Wu, S., Martek, I., … Ghodrati, N. (2021). Blockchain and the ‘Internet of Things’’ for the construction industry: research trends and opportunities.’ Automation in Construction, 132(103942), 103942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103942
10. FAO (2022 February 17). FAO.org website: https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US20200001913
11. Feng, H., Wang, X., Duan, Y., Zhang, J., & Zhang, X. (2020). Applying blockchain technology to improve agri-food traceability: A review of development methods, benefits and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 260(121031), 121031. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652620310787
12. Friedman, N., & Ormiston, J. (2022). Blockchain as a sustainability-oriented innovation?: Opportunities for and resistance to Blockchain technology as a driver of sustainability in global food supply chains. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175(121403), 121403. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162521008349
13. Gray, M., & Downer, T. (2021). Midwives’ perspectives of the challenges in mentoring students: A qualitative survey. Collegian (Royal College of Nursing, Australia), 28(1), 135–142. https://www.collegianjournal.com/article/S1322-7696%2820%2930063-9/pdf
14. Idoje, G., Dagiuklas, T., & Iqbal, M. (2021). Survey for smart farming technologies: Challenges and issues. Computers & Electrical Engineering: An International Journal, 92(107104), 107104. https://openresearch.lsbu.ac.uk/item/8w06x
15. Indrarespati, R., Haekal, J., & Kholil, M. (2021). Analisa Risiko Operasional Persediaan Pada Gudang Bahan Baku UKM Makanan Ringan Metode FMEA. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Aplikasi Sistem & Teknik Industri (PASTI), XV(2), 221–229. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/518053-none-39012255.pdf
16. Jones, J. (2017, March 20). Ideal sample size in qualitative research. Retrieved February 17, 2022, from InterQ research website: https://interq-research.com/ideal-sample-size-in-qualitative research/
17. Kamilaris, A., Fonts, A., & Prenafeta-Boldύ, F. X. (2019). The rise of blockchain technology in agriculture and food supply chains. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 91, 640–652.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335290647_The_Rise_of_Blockchain_Technology_in_Agriculture_and_Food_Supply_Chains
18. Kauffman, R. J., & Techatassanasoontorn, A. A. (2011). New theories and methods for technology adoption research. Information Technology and Management, 12(4), 289–291. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10799-011-0109-2
19. Mohanta, B. K., Jena, D., Panda, S. S., & Sobhanayak, S. (2019). Blockchain technology: A survey on applications and security privacy challenges. Internet of Things, 8(100107), 100107. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542660518300702
20. Mohanta, B. K., Jena, D., Satapathy, U., & Patnaik, S. (2020). Survey on IoT security: Challenges and solution using machine learning, artificial intelligence and blockchain technology. Internet of Things, 11(100227), 100227. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341512091_Survey_on_IoT_SecurityChallenges_and_Solution_using_Machine_Learning_Artificial_Intelligence_and_Blockchain_Technology
21. Nakyinsige, K., Man, Y. B. C., & Sazili, A. Q. (2012). Halal authenticity issues in meat and meat products. Meat Science, 91(3), 207–214. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22405913/
22. Rather, I. A., Kumar, G., & Saha, R. (2021). Survey on RoF technology and the mitigation schemes over the challenges in the RoF network. Optik, 247(168007), 168007. https://srb.sdl.edu.sa/esploro/outputs/journalArticle/Survey-on-RoF-technology-and-the/9940496008331
23. Sanka, A. I., Irfan, M., Huang, I., & Cheung, R. C. C. (2021). A survey of breakthrough in blockchain technology: Adoptions, applications, challenges and future research. Computer Communications, 169, 179–201. https://cms.parallelchain.io/uploads/A_survey_of_breakthrough_in_blockchain_technology_79d63c6b63.pdf
24. SMI Asia Australia (2023, February 21). Practical Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Workshop [PowerPoint slides]. SMI Asia Resource Consultant. http://www.smiasia.org.
25. Trafialek, J., & Kolanowski, W. (2014). Application of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) for audit of HACCP system. Food Control, 44, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.03.036
26. Varzakas, T. (2015). HACCP and ISO22000: Risk Assessment in Conjunction with Other Food Safety Tools Such as FMEA, Ishikawa Diagrams and Pareto. In Encyclopedia of Food and Health (pp. 295–302). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384947-2.00320-2
27. Varzakas, T. H. (2011). Application of ISO22000, failure mode, and effect analysis (FMEA) cause and effect diagrams and pareto in conjunction with HACCP and risk assessment for processing of pastry products. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 51(8), 762–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408391003799970
28. Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Thorpe, S., & Young, T. (2018). Characterizing and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7
29. Wong, L.-W., Leong, L.-Y., Hew, J.-J., Tan, G. W.-H., & Ooi, K.-B. (2020). Time to seize the digital evolution: Adoption of blockchain in operations and supply chain management among Malaysian SMEs. International Journal of Information Management, 52(101997), 101997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.005.