Sustaining university-industry collaborations in nanotechnology research: The Malaysian case
List of Authors
  • Kasthoory Rajalingam

Keyword
  • R&D Management, Technology Transfer, Emerging Technology, Research Policy

Abstract
  • University-Industry (U-I) collaborations during the course of technology development – commercialization cycle needs to be “symbiotically mutual” to both academia and industry. Based on this principle, this paper aims to determine the obstacles in sustaining U-I collaborations. By referring to the qualitative case study of nanotechnology research in Malaysia, it is evident that the two-way opposite directional priorities are what disables the mere fortification of U-I collaborations. Results from ten in-depth interview sessions have highlighted five main barriers to U-I collaborations, namely the issues of distinct logics and priorities, patent and commercialization, time factor, product safety, and product functionality and capabilities. The findings also suggest that the expected yield derived from U-I collaborations are to be the product of continuous re-engineering performed iteratively rather than “fast track” results.

Reference
  • 1. Balconi, Margherita, and Andrea Laboranti. 2006. "University–industry interactions in applied research: The case of microelectronics." Research Policy 35 (10):1616-30.

    2. Barnes, Tina, Ian Pashby, and Anne Gibbons. 2002. "Effective University–Industry Interaction:: A Multi-case Evaluation of Collaborative R&D Projects." European Management Journal 20 (3):272-85.

    3. Boardman, P Craig, and Branco L Ponomariov. 2009. "University researchers working with private companies." Technovation 29 (2):142-53.

    4. Bruneel, Johan, Pablo d’Este, and Ammon Salter. 2010. "Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration." Research Policy 39 (7):858-68.

    5. Bychkova, Olga. 2016. "Innovation by coercion: Emerging institutionalization of university–industry collaborations in Russia." Social Studies of Science:0306312716654768.

    6. Etzkowitz, Henry. 1998. "The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages." Research Policy 27 (8):823-33.

    7. Eun, Jong-Hak, Keun Lee, and Guisheng Wu. 2006. "Explaining the “University-run enterprises” in China: A theoretical framework for university–industry relationship in developing countries and its application to China." Research Policy 35 (9):1329-46.

    8. Fernández-Esquinas, Manuel, Hugo Pinto, Manuel Pérez Yruela, and Tiago Santos Pereira. 2015. "Tracing the flows of knowledge transfer: Latent dimensions and determinants of university–industry interactions in peripheral innovation systems." Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

    9. Giuliani, Elisa, and Valeria Arza. 2009. "What drives the formation of ‘valuable’university–industry linkages?: Insights from the wine industry." Research Policy 38 (6):906-21.

    10. Kato, Masatoshi, and Hiroyuki Odagiri. 2012. "Development of university life-science programs and university–industry joint research in Japan." Research Policy 41 (5):939-52.

    11. Lee, Yong S. 1996. "‘Technology transfer’and the research university: a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration." Research Policy 25 (6):843-63.

    12. ———. 2000. "The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: An empirical assessment." The Journal of Technology Transfer 25 (2):111-33.

    13. Motohashi, Kazuyuki. 2005. "University–industry collaborations in Japan: The role of new technology-based firms in transforming the National Innovation System." Research Policy 34 (5):583-94.

    14. Perkmann, Markus, Valentina Tartari, Maureen McKelvey, Erkko Autio, Anders Broström, Pablo D’Este, Riccardo Fini, Aldo Geuna, Rosa Grimaldi, and Alan Hughes. 2013. "Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations." Research Policy 42 (2):423-42.

    15. Scandura, Alessandra. 2016. "University–industry collaboration and firms’ R&D effort." Research Policy 45 (9):1907-22.

    16. Villani, Elisa, Einar Rasmussen, and Rosa Grimaldi. 2017. "How intermediary organizations facilitate university–industry technology transfer: A proximity approach." Technological Forecasting and Social Change 114:86-102.