Characteristics of exocentric nominal compounds in Berom: A semantic view of the noun-verb agentive mwat tabak and mwat ha
List of Authors
  • Marcus, Pam , Yap, Teng Teng

Keyword
  • nominal compounds, noun-verb compounds, agentive compounds,

Abstract
  • Nominal compounds, which are very productive in Berom, are formed by combining the noun and verb constituents. The NV compounds are interpreted as the agent, location, or instrument based on the meaning of the existing nominal constituent. This study analyses the semantics of two types of Berom agentive compounds: mwat tabak ‘preacher, [literally, person shoot]’ and mwat ha ‘speaker, [literally, person talk]’. First, both words are realized from the NV structure and the agentive meaning of the compounds is derived from the interpretation of an unspecified N [mwat] that performs the action which is apparently expressed by the V constituent in mwat ha and an action that is not expressed by the V constituent in mwat tabak. Secondly, the two compounds lack the deverbal suffix such as the English -er that is usually attached to agentive nouns and as such they are both treated as compounds with different semantic realizations. The analyses show that the two constructions vary significantly not only in terms of semantics, but also in their specific role and interpretation of the action expressed by the verbal constituent. We argued that the agent nouns in the compounds employ diverse prosodic features such as tone and pitch, in the activity that the compound revealed. Consequently, we conclude that the meaning of agentive compounds in Berom may not necessarily be determined by the structural and semantic property of the compound but by the interaction between the constituents and the relevant context of usage

Reference
  • 1. Aboh, E. O. & Essegbey, J. (2010). General properties of the clause. In Enoch O. Aboh &Essegbey James (eds.), Topics in Kwa syntax, 39 –64. Springer.
    2. Basciano, B., Kula, N. & Melloni, C. (2011). Modes of compounding in bantu, Romance and Chinese. Rivista di linguistica 23(2), 293 –249.
    3. Bauer, L. (2008). Exocentric compounds. Morphology, 18, 51-74.
    4. Bauer, L. (2010). The typology of exocentric compounds. In S. Scalise & I. Vogel (Eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding (pp. 167-175). John Benjamins.
    5. Benczes, R. (2006). Creative Compounding in English. John Benjamins.
    6. Blench, R.M. (2000). Revising Plateau. In E. Wolff & O. Gensler (Eds.), Proceedings of 2nd WOCAL (pp. 159-174). Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.
    7. Booij, G.E. (1988). The relation between inheritance and argument linking: deverbal nouns in Dutch. In: Everaert, M., Evers, A., Huybregts, R., Trommelen, M. (Eds.), Morphology and Modularity. In Honour of Henk Schultink. Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 57–74.
    8. Booij, G. E. (2010). Construction morphology. Oxford University Press.
    9. Booij, G. E. (2013). Morphology in Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 189-202). Oxford University Press.
    10. Broohm, O. N. & Melloni, C. (2021). Action nominalization: a view from Esahie (Kwa). Journal of African Languages and Linguistics, 42(1): 27–62.
    11. Contreras, H. (1985). Spanish exocentric compounds. In F. Unesse. & Jr. Jr. (Eds.). Current Issues in Hispanic Phonology and Morphology (pp. 14-27). Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistic Club.
    12. Creissels, D. (2004). Le nom composé en Bambara. In P. Arnaud (Ed), Le nom composé: données sur 16 langues. Press Universitaires de Lyon.
    13. Creissels, D.(2019). Morphology in Niger-Congo Languages. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. https://oxfordre.com/linguistics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-535
    14. Di Sciullo, A. & Williams. E. S. (1987). On the definition of word. MIT Press.
    15. Grimshaw, J. (1990). ArgumentStructure. MIT Press.
    16. Haspelmath, M. (2002). Understanding morphology. Arnold.
    17. Higazi, A. (2016). Farmer-pastoralist conflicts on the Jos Plateau, central Nigeria: security responses of local vigilantes and the Nigerian state. Conflict, Security & Development, 16(4), 365-385, https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2016.1200314
    18. Higginbotham, J. (2003). Conditionals and Compositionality. In J. Hawthorne (Ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 17, 181–194.
    19. Higginbotham, J. (2007). Remarks on Compositionality. In G. Ramchand and C. Reiss (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces (pp. 425-444). Oxford University Press.
    20. Katamba, F. & Stonham, J. (2006). Morphology. Palgrave Macmillan.
    21. Kornfeld, L. M. (2009). IE, Romance: Spanish. In P. Štekauer & R. Lieber (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 436-452). Oxford University Press.
    22. Lieber, R. (2016). Compounding in the lexical semantic framework. In P. T. Hacken (Ed.), The Semantics of Compounding (pp. 38-53). Cambridge University Press.
    23. Lieber, R. (1983). Argument linking and compounds in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 14 (2), 251-285.
    24. Marcus, P. B. (2021). An Analysis of Exocentric Compounds in Berom. PhD Thesis, Universiti Malaya.
    25. Marcus, P. B. & Yamaguchi, T. (2019). Deverbative [VN] exocentric compounds in Berom. Presented at the 7th Faculty of Languages and Linguistics Postgraduate Research Conference (FLL-PGRC7), Universiti Malaya.
    26. Marcus, P. B. (2018). Mother tongue interference on the spoken English of Berom speaking students in Plateau State Polytechnic. Journal of Humanities and Social Science. 23, 43-47.
    27. Marcus, P. B. & Yamaguchi, T. (forthcoming). Nominal compounds in Berom: A semantic overview of the N-V exocentric compounds. International Journal of Humanities Social Science and Management.
    28. Naccarato, C. (2019). Agentive (para)synthetic compounds in Russian: a quantitative study of rival constructions. Morphology 29, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-018-9330-6
    29. Pwajok, O. E. (1987). A Short Grammar of Berom. B.A. dissertation, University of Jos.
    30. Rosemberg, M. (2007). Agent Nouns, Productivity and Diachrony: An Analysis of [VN/A]N/A Compounds and -eur Derivations in French. In G. Booij et al. (Eds.), On-line Proceedings of the Fifth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM5) Fréjus 15-18 September 2005, Università degli Studi di Bologna, 359-377. http://mmm.lingue.unibo.it/proc-mmm5.php
    31. Selkirk, E. O. (1982). The syntax of words. MIT Press.
    32. Simons, G. & Charles, D. F. (Eds.). (2018). Ethnologue: Languages of the world, Twenty -first edition. SIL International. http://www.ethnologue.com.
    33. Yoon, J. (2009). Constructional meanings of verb-noun compounds in Spanish: Limpiabotas vs. tientaparedes. Language Sciences, 31, 507-530.