Expanding students’ choices in language education
List of Authors
  • Jacobs, George , Renandya, Willy

Keyword
  • student choice, student-centred learning, extensive reading, cooperative learning, thinking questions, democratization,

Abstract
  • Many teachers seem interested in their classes being more student-centered. Students making more choices about their own learning forms a key aspect of student-centered learning, as well as life-long learning. This article offers ideas for ways to provide students with more choices in their learning and suggests ways to encourage students to make choices when given opportunities to do so. These ideas for increasing student choice include extensive reading, cooperative learning, multiple intelligences, service learning, thinking questions, and use of the internet and other IT affordances. Student choice fits with an overall paradigm shift toward democratizing society, and it also fits with greater choice for teachers. Theoretical underpinnings of student choice include social cognitivism, social constructivism, humanistic psychology, self-directed learning, and social interdependence theory.

Reference
  • 1. Armstrong, T. (2017). Multiple intelligences in the classroom (4th ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    2. Biletska, I. O., Paladieva, A. F., Avchinnikova, H. D., & Kazak, Y. Y. (2021). The use of modern technologies by foreign language teachers: developing digital skills. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 16-27.
    3. Blithe, S. J., & Fidelibus, B. (2021). Faculty-Undergraduate Course Curriculum Collaboration. College Teaching, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2021.1920879
    4. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive domain. McKay.
    5. Borgerding, L. A., & Dagistan, M. (2018). Preservice science teachers’ concerns and approaches for teaching socioscientific and controversial issues. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(4), 283-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1440860
    6. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2017). The social life of information. Harvard Business Review Press.
    7. Bruner, J. S. (1973). Beyond the information given: Studies in the psychology of knowing. W. W. Norton.
    8. Council for Third Age. (2021). Geragogy guidelines. https://www.c3a.org.sg/geragogy-guidelines
    9. Covey, S. R. (2004). The 7 habits of highly effective people: Powerful lessons in personal change. Simon and Schuster.
    10. Dewey, D. (1897). My pedagogic creed”, School Journal, 54, 77–80.
    11. Di Vesta, F. J. (2017). Applications of cognitive psychology to education. In M. C. Wittrock, & F. Farley (Eds.) The future of educational psychology (pp. 37-73). Routledge.
    12. El-Muslimah, A. H. S., Hartono, R., Faridi, A., & Astuti, P. (2021, June). The effectiveness of digital bubble mind map towards learners’ writing ability at Islamic higher education in Kalimantan. In UNNES-TEFLIN National Seminar, 4(1), 441-451. https://utns.proceedings.id/index.php/utns/article/view/137
    13. Epstein, J. L., Sanders, M. G., Sheldon, S. B., Simon, B. S., Salinas, K. C., Jansorn, N. R., ... & Williams, K. J. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action. Corwin Press.
    14. Extensive Reading Foundation. (n.d.a). 5-Finger Rule. http://erfoundation.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/5-finger-rule-1.jpg
    15. Extensive Reading Foundation. (n.d.b). Guide to extensive reading. https://erfoundation.org/guide/ERF_Guide.pdf
    16. Extensive Reading Foundation. (n.d.c). Resources. https://erfoundation.org/wordpress/useful-resources
    17. Fard, E. E., & Vakili, A. (2018). The effect of problem-based learning on Iranian EFL learners' vocabulary learning. Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(1), 208. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.1.15.208
    18. Frank, A. (1947). Diary of Anne Frank. Contact Publishing.
    19. Fromm, E. (1994). Escape from freedom. Holt.
    20. Garcia, O. F., & Serra, E. (2019). Raising children with poor school performance: Parenting styles and short-and long-term consequences for adolescent and adult development. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(7), 1089. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071089
    21. Gardner, H. (1985). The mind’s new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. Basic Books.
    22. Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory and practice. Basic Books.
    23. Giordano, K. (2020, January 8). Stop closing the door. Teachers on Fire magazine. https://medium.com/teachers-on-fire/stop-closing-the-door-3e59a9b71516
    24. Goldratt, E. M., & Cox, J. (2016). The goal: a process of ongoing improvement. Routledge.
    25. Good Food Institute. (2021). Cultivated meat. https://gfi.org/cultivated
    26. Hale, R. (2020). ‘It made me think how I should treat others and how I should help people who need it’: The complexities of exploring the impact of Holocaust education. Oxford Review of Education, 46(6), 788-803.
    27. Hancock, J., & Mattick, K. (2020). Tolerance of ambiguity and psychological well‐being in medical training: a systematic review. Medical Education, 54(2), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14031
    28. Harrold, P. (2019). Integrating Xreading into class time using post-reading tasks. In L. Bradley & S. Thouësny, et al.(Eds.), CALL and complexity –Short papers from EUROCALL 2019 (pp. 174-179.) Research-publishing.net
    29. Herrera, L. J. P., & Kidwell, T. (2018). Literature circles 2.0: Updating a classic strategy for the 21st century. Multicultural Education, 25(2), 17-21. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1181553.pdf
    30. Hiler, W., & Paul, R. (2006). Active & cooperative learning. Foundation for Critical Thinking.
    31. Jacobs, G. M., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2001). Paradigm shift: Understanding and implementing change in second language education. TESL-EJ, 5(1). https://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume5/ej17/ej17a1/
    32. Jacobs, G. M., Lie, A., & Tamah, S. M. (in press.) Cooperative learning through a reflective lens. Equinox.
    33. Jacobs, G. M., Renandya, W. A., & Power, M. (2016). Simple, powerful strategies for student centered learning. Springer International Publishing.
    34. Jespersen, D., & Dimova, S. (2021). Response processes in L2 writing tasks with Internet access. Apples-Journal of Applied Language Studies, 15(1), 19-38. https://doi.org/10.47862/apples.99431
    35. Jimoh, F., Lund, E. K., Harvey, L. J., Frost, C., Lay, W. J., Roe, M. A., ... & Finglas, P. M. (2018). Comparing diet and exercise monitoring using smartphone app and paper diary: a two-phase intervention study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 6(1), e17. https://mhealth.jmir.org/2018/1/e17/
    36. Jocius, R., & Shealy, S. (2018). Critical book clubs: Reimagining literature reading and response. The Reading Teacher, 71(6), 691-702. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1655
    37. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social Interdependence Theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365-379.
    38. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1996). Academic Controversy: Enriching college instruction through intellectual conflict. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 25(3).
    39. Kahn, B., Moore, W. L., & Glazer, R. (1987). Experiments in constrained choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(1), 96-113.
    40. Kincheloe, J. (2012). Teachers as researchers: Qualitative inquiry as a path to empowerment. Routledge.
    41. Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Association Press.
    42. Krashen, S. D. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research. ABC-CLIO.
    43. Lake, V. E., & Adinolfi, S. D. (2017). Preschool: Young children take action: Service learning with preschoolers. YC Young Children, 72(2), 80-84.
    44. Lancaster, R. W. (2017). A comparison of student-centered and teacher-centered learning approaches in one alternative learning classroom environment. [Doctoral dissertation, Arkansas State University.] ProQuest Dissertations Publishing,
    45. Lewis, M. A., & Zisselsberger, M. G. (2019). Scaffolding and inequitable participation in linguistically diverse book clubs. Reading Research Quarterly, 54(2), 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.234
    46. Liss, L. L. (in press). Promoting religious tolerance. In G. M. Jacobs & G. V. Crookes (Eds.) Becoming community-engaged educators: Engaging students within and beyond the classroom walls. Springer.
    47. Lypka, A. (2018). Infusing participatory digital service-learning to deepen community-engaged professional excellence: Triumphs and challenges. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 8(2),77-93. https://readingmatrix.com/files/19-mh2w200n.pdf
    48. McNelly, T. A. The effects of student created videos on vocabulary knowledge. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 25(3), 1-13. http://www.rapidintellect.com/AEQweb/ed-6047.pdf
    49. Meganathan, P., Thai, Y. N., Paramasivam, S., & Jalaluddin, I. (2020). Reading preference and reactions towards different types of post-reading activities among Tamil primary school students. Journal of Language and Communication (JLC), 7(2), 701-720.
    50. Milhollan, F., & Forisha, B. E. (1972). From Skinner to Rogers: Contrasting approaches to education. Professional Educators Publications.
    51. Namaziandost, E., Esfahani, F. R., & Nasri, M. (2019). Texts with various levels of hardness, reading comprehension and reading motivation: I+ 1 versus i-1. ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(1), 60-77. https://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v8i1.30992
    52. Nation, I. S. P., & Waring, R. (2019). Teaching extensive reading in another language. Routledge.
    53. National Association of Local Boards of Health (2010). Understanding concentrated animal feeding operations and their impact on communities. https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/ehs/docs/understanding_cafos_nalboh.pdf
    54. Ng, D. (2020, December 13). Thailand’s seafood slavery: Why the abuse of fishermen just won't go away. Channelnews Asia. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/cnainsider/thailand-seafood-slavery-why-abuse-fishermen-will-not-go-away-726661
    55. Nguyen, T. M., & Dao, T. X. P. (2021). Impact of integrating task-based learning and functional approach to empower learners’ communicative competence. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 2(2), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlts.v2i2.142
    56. Oke, A., & Fernandes, F. A. P. (2020). Innovations in teaching and learning: Exploring the perceptions of the education sector on the 4th industrial revolution (4IR). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6020031
    57. Parkinson, C. N. (1955, November 19). Parkinson’s Law. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/news/1955/11/19/parkinsons-law
    58. Priestley, M., & Xenofontos, C. (2020). Curriculum making: Key concepts and practices. In J. Biddulph & J. Flutter (Eds.), Inspiring primary curriculum design (pp. 1-13). Routledge.
    59. Rahmatollahi, M., & Zenouzagh, Z. M. (2021). Designing and validating an evaluation inventory for assessing teachers’ professional accountability. Language Testing in Asia, 11(1), 1-21.
    60. Rajabpour, A. (2020). Students’ perceptions of M-Reader. TEFLIN Journal, 31(2), 277-301. http://journal.teflin.org/index.php/journal/article/view/1032
    61. Richardson, C., & Mishra, P. (2018). Learning environments that support student creativity: Developing the SCALE. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.11.004
    62. Rogers, C. (1969). Freedom to learn: A view of what education might become. Charles Merill.
    63. Röhl, S. (2021). Effects of student feedback on teaching and classes: An overview and meta-analysis of intervention studies. In W. Rollett (Ed.), Student feedback on teaching in schools (pp. 139-156). Springer.
    64. Rothman, R. (2009). Behind the classroom door. Harvard Education Letter, 25(6). https://www.hepg.org/hel-home/issues/25_6/helarticle/behind-the-classroom-door_427
    65. Sahlberg, P. (2021). Finnish lessons 3. 0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.
    66. Setyarini, S., & Ling, M. A. (2019). Promoting higher order thinking skills in storytelling for teaching English to young adolescents in 21st century. KnE Social Sciences, 155-164. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i10.3897
    67. Singapore Book Council. (2021). About. https://www.bookcouncil.sg/about
    68. Tversky, A., Sattath, S., & Slovic, P. (1988). Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review, 95(3), 371–384. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.95.3.371
    69. UN. (2020). Goal 6: Ensure access to water and sanitation for all. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/water-and-sanitation/
    70. UNICEF. (2020). Education. https://www.unicef.org/education
    71. Ulla, M. B., Barrera, K. I. B., & Acompanado, M. M. (2017). Philippine classroom teachers as researchers: Teachers' perceptions, motivations, and challenges. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 42(11), 52-64.
    72. Villavicencio, A., Jaffe-Walter, R., & Klevan, S. (2021). “You can’t close your door here:” Leveraging teacher collaboration to improve outcomes for immigrant English Learners. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97,103227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103227
    73. Zilonis, M. F., & Swerling, C. (2020). Building school library collections with windows and mirrors. In A. M. Dawkins (Eds.), Intellectual freedom issues in school libraries (pp. 181-183). ABC-CLIO