Visual elements in children’s concrete poems: A multimodal analysis of Rain and Ice Cubes
List of Authors
  • Kaur, Surinderpal , Thusha Devi Rajendra

Keyword
  • Concrete poetry, Multimodal analysis, Compositional meaning, Salience, Framing

Abstract
  • This study is based on the multimodal analysis of two children’s concrete poems from the poetry book, Splish Splash (1994) by Joan Bransfield Graham. It employs Kress and van Leeuwen’s (2006) Visual Grammar as the analytical tool to analyse the visuals in terms of compositional meaning. It investigates how visual elements (words and images) are represented in the poems. In addition, it focuses on the features of the images and how they cohere on a page. The findings suggest that the representations of images in the poems reproduce the dominant theme of water and its forms. Furthermore, the interrelated-systems of salience and framing are used extensively and they contribute to meaning-making. Words and images support each other and coexist to provide meanings in the poems. Therefore, the combination of words and images creates a meaningful whole and offers readers greater opportunities to create meanings.

Reference
  • 1. Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception: A Psychology of the creative eye, (rev.edn.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
    2. Baldry, A. & Thibault, P. J. (2006, 2005). Multimodal transcription and text analysis: A multimodal toolkit and coursebook. London: Equinox.
    3. Bateman, J. A. (2008). Multimodality and genre: A foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    4. Bodden, V. (2010). Poetry basics: Concrete poetry. Minnesota: Creative Education.
    5. Bohn, W. (2011). Reading visual poetry. Maryland: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
    6. Borkent, M. (2010). The materiality of cognition: Concrete poetry and the embodied mind. Wreck 3(1).
    7. Carter, D. (1998). Teaching poetry in the primary school: Perspectives for a new generation. London: David Fulton Publishers Ltd.
    8. Cheong, H. F., & Kaur, S. (2015). Legitimising male grooming through packaging discourse: a linguistic analysis. Social Semiotics. 25(3), 364-385. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/csos20. DOI: 10.1080/10350330.2015.1026650.
    9. Ci-Shu, Shen. & Yi-Ping, Wu. (2012). Translating beyond languages: The challenges of rendering Taiwan’s visual concrete poems in English. The AALITRA Review: A Journal of Literary Translation. No 5. Melbourne: Monash University. 15-30. Retrieved from www.nla.gov.au/openpublish/index..../2964
    10. Dondis, D. A. (1973). A primer of visual literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    11. Draper, R. P. (1971). Concrete Poetry. New Literary History. 2(2), 329-340.
    12. Eleftheriou, P., Stamou, A. G., Alevriadou, A. & Tsakiridou. (2013). A comparative study of representations about disability in primary school children’s drawings: a sociosemiotic approach. Social Semiotics, 23(5), 663-674. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/csos20. DOI: 10.1080/10350330.2012.739002.
    13. Gatto, J. A., Porter, A.W., Selleck, J. (1987). Exploring visual design (2nd edn.). Massachusetts: Davis Publications, Inc.
    14. Graham, J. B. (1994). Splish splash. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Company.
    15. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). Functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
    16. Jewitt, C. (2009). An introduction to multimodality. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
    17. Jirousek, C. (1995). Introduction to the elements of design: Point. Retrieved from http://char.txa.cornell.edu/language/ELEMENT/element.htm
    18. John, A. E., & Olajoke, A. S. (2012). Engaging with Old Testament stories. A multimodal social semiotic approach to children bible illustrations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 1(5), 219-225. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/40649226/Engaging_with_Old_Testament_Stories_A_Multimodal_Social_Semiotic_Approach_to_Children_Bible_Illustrations
    19. Joshi, A. R. (2009). Untranslatability in the visual arts: Examples from visual concrete poetry. Translation Today, 6(1&2), 1-29. Retrieved from www.ntm.org.in/.../Articles/01%20-%20Untranslatability%20in%20the%
    20. Jumaah, A. N. F. (2019). Visual representations of Iraqi refugees in DEUTSCHE WELLE. (Unpublished Masters dissertation). University of Malaya.
    21. Kabuto, B. (2009). Color as a semiotic resource in early sign making. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 11(2), 1-20.
    22. Khoo, M.Y.L. (2019). Multimodality in the front covers of chick lit book. (Unpublished Masters dissertation). University of Malaya.
    23. Kiefer, B. (1995). The potential of picturebooks: From visual literacy to aesthetic understanding. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    24. Knowles, K., Schaffner, A. N., Weger, U., & Roberts, A. M. (2012). Reading space in visual poetry: New cognitive perspectives. Writing Technologies, Volume 4, 75-106.
    25. Kress, G. (2008). “Literacy” in a multimodal environment of communication. In J. Flood, S.B. Heath & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts, Volume 2, 91-100. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    26. Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
    27. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006/1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
    28. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2002). Colour as a semiotic mode: Notes for a grammar of colour. Visual Communication, 1(3), 343-368.
    29. Ledin, P., & Machin, D. (2018). Doing visual analysis: From theory to practice. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
    30. Machin, D. (2007). Introduction to multimodal analysis. London: Hodder Arnold.
    31. Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
    32. Md Sidin Ahmad Ishak. (2007). Graphic Communication: Concepts and practice. Kuala Lumpur: University Malaya Press.
    33. Meyer, M. (2017). Concrete research poetry: A visual representation of metaphor. Art/Research International: A Transdisciplinary Journal, 2(1), 32-57.
    34. Ministry of Education. (2001). English curriculum for primary schools in Malaysia. Curriculum Development Centre.
    35. Moya, A. J. (2010). A multimodal analysis of The Tale of Peter Rabbit within the interpersonal metafunction. ATLANTIS: Journal of Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies, 32(1), 123-140. Retrieved from http://www.atlantisjournal.org/ARCHIVE/32.1/2010MoyaGuijarro.pdf
    36. Moya, A. J. (2014). A multimodal analysis of picture books for children: A systemic functional approach. Sheffield, United Kingdom: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
    37. Moya, A. J. & Pinar, M. J. (2008). Compositional, interpersonal and representational meanings in a children’s narrative: A multimodal discourse analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(9), 1601-1619.
    38. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review. Volume 66. 60-92.
    39. Nikolajeva, M. & Scott, C. (2000, 2006). The dynamics of picturebook communication. Children’s Literature in Education. 31(4),225-239.
    40. Nodelman, P. & Reimer, M. (2003). The pleasures of children’s literature (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    41. Painter, C., Martin, J. R. & Unsworth, L. (2013). Reading visual narratives: Image analysis of children’s picture books. London: Equinox Publishing.
    42. Rajendra, T. R. (2016). A multimodal analysis of graphic novels used in the Malaysian English language classroom. (Unpublished Ph.D thesis). University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.
    43. Robertson, J. (2008). Fourth and fifth grade classroom case study of response to multimodal representations in children’s picture books. (Doctoral Thesis). Syracuse University. Retrieved from ProQuest Database.
    44. Russel, D. L. (2009). Literature for children: A short introduction(6th ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    45. Salbego, N., Heberle, V. M. & Balen, M. G. S. da Silva. (2015). A visual analysis of English textbooks: Multimodal scaffolded learning. Calidoscopio, 13(1), 5-13.
    46. Serafini, F. (2014). Reading the visual: An introduction to teaching multimodal literacy. New York: Teachers College Press.
    47. Serafini, F. (2012). Reading multimodal texts in the 21st century. Research in the Schools, 19(1), 26-32.
    48. Serafini, F. (2011). Expanding perspectives for comprehending visual images in multimodal texts. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(5), 342-350.
    49. Serafini, F. & Clausen, J. (2012). Typography as semiotic resource. Journal of Visual Literacy, 31(2), 12-29.
    50. Shen, C., & Wu, Y. (2012). Translating beyond languages: The challenges of rendering Taiwan’s visual concrete poems in English. The AALITRA Review: A Journal of Literary Translation, 5, 15-30. Retrieved from www.nla.gov.au/openpublish/index..../2964
    51. Tan, P. W. (2017). A systemic functional linguistic study of experiential meanings in tourism brochures. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Malaya.
    52. Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. Buckingham, United Kingdom: Open University Press.
    53. Unsworth, L. & Wheeler, J. (2002). Re-valuing the role of images in reviewing picture books. Reading Language and Literacy. 36(2), 68-74.
    54. van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. Oxon: Routledge.
    55. van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Towards a semiotics of typography. Information Design Journal, 14(2), 139-155.
    56. van Leeuwen, T. (2011). The language of colour: An introduction. Oxon: Routledge.
    57. Wang, X. (2012). A study of visual poem “in Just” – from the perspective of multimodal discourse analysis. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(12), 2649-2654.