Global responsibility: An exploratory corpus assisted discourse analysis of the Rohingya crisis in online media
List of Authors
  • Roe, Jasper

Keyword
  • Discourse, Corpora, Linguistics, Rohingya, Myanmar

Abstract
  • This study conducts an exploratory corpus-assisted discourse analysis of the representation of the Rohingya minority group across online news media in the United Kingdom. The purpose of the study is to identify and interpret the discursive patterns employed in popular online news media when depicting the Rohingya minority and associated crises affecting the group in Myanmar and worldwide. Through the use of a combination of frequency, collocation, and concordance analysis, a synchronic study was undertaken using data collected from fifteen major online news media producers in the United Kingdom. The data was collected over a period from January 2017 – August 2020 through freely accessible digital archives. The research study found that particular discourses of security, internationalization, and power are commonly employed when reporting on the Rohingya, while equally a sympathetic viewpoint is often adopted which focuses specifically on global responsibility and failures of international society. The findings offer insight into socio-political processes of representation and discourse in the ‘new social location’ (Scholz, 2019) of online news media, while offering relevant insight into the discourses of urgent and pressing humanitarian issues.

Reference
  • 1. Afzal (2018). Elements of pathos and media framing as scientific discourse: A newspaper perspective on Rohingya crisis. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences. 3,89-99.
    2. Albert, E. & Chatzky, A (2018). The Rohingya crisis. Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved from https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/rohingya-crisis.
    3. Baker, P. & Egbert, J (2016). Triangulating methodological approaches in corpus linguistic research. Routledge.
    4. Baker, P. & McEnery, T. (2005). A corpus-based approach to discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in UN and newspaper texts. Journal of Language and Politics. 4,197-226.
    5. Baker, P.(2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. Continuum.
    6. Bowser (2019). “I don’t want to see them in this country”: colonialism, capitalism, and the origins of Burmese Islamophobia 1930-1938. In B. Ahmed (Ed.). International Conference on the Rohingya Crisis in Comparative Perspective: Book of Abstracts. London: University College London.
    7. Brooten, L. & Verbruggen, Y. (2017). Producing the news: Reporting on Myanmar’s Rohingya crisis. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 47, 440-460.
    8. Brooten, L. (2015). Blind spots in human rights coverage: Framing violence against the Rohingya in Myanmar/Burma. Popular Communication, 13, 132-144.
    9. Cheesman, N. (2017). How in Myanmar “National Races” came to surpass citizenship and exclude Rohingya. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 47(3), 461-483
    10. Durrant, P. & Doherty, A. (2010). Are high-frequency collocations psychologically real? Investigating the thesis of collocational priming. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 6, 125-155.
    11. Daghigh, A, & Rahim, A H (2020). Representation of Muslim minorities in politicians’ discourse: Jacinda Arden vs Donald Trump. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 5(2), 179-195 DOI:10.1080/13602004.2020.1773099
    12. Dussich, J. (2018). The ongoing genocidal crisis of the Rohingya minority in Myanmar. Journal of Victimology and Victim Justice, 1(1), 4-24.
    13. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 3, 193-217.
    14. Farzana, K. (2017). Memories of Burmese Rohingya refugees: Contested identity and belonging. Palgrave Macmillan.
    15. Freake, R., Gentil, G. & Sheyholislami, J (2010). A bilingual corpus-assisted discourse study of the construction of nationhood and belonging in Quebec. Discourse & Society, 22, 21-47.
    16. Fullbrook, R. (2019). Preface. In B. Ahmed(Ed.) International Conference on the Rohingya Crisis in Comparative Perspective. Book of Abstracts. London: University College London.
    17. Gabrielatos, C. & Baker, P. (2008). Fleeing, sneaking, flooding. Journal of English Linguistics. 36, 5-38.
    18. Garland, D. (2014). What is a “history of the present”? On Foucault’s genealogies and their critical preconditions. Punishment & Society, 16(4), 365-384.
    19. Gusfield, J. (1986). The culture of public problems. Univ. of Chicago Press.
    20. Hunston, S., (2010). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
    21. ICJ (2020). Application of the convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar). ICJ. Retrieved from https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/178/178-20200123-PRE-01-00-EN.pdf.
    22. KhosraviNik, M. (2014). Dynamics of world events and immigration representations in the British press. In C. Hart & P. Cap (Eds.). Contemporary critical discourse studies. Bloomsbury, London, pp. 501-519.
    23. Koester, A. (2010). Building small specialised corpora. In A. O'Keefe & M. McCarthy (Eds.). The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics.(pp.66-89). Routledge.
    24. Koteyko, N. (2014). Language and politics in post-Soviet Russia. Palgrave Macmillan.
    25. McEnery, T., Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus Linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
    26. McIlvenny, P. (1996). Heckling in Hyde Park: Verbal audience participation in popular public discourse. Language in Society. 2, 27-60.
    27. Morley, J., & Partington, A., (2009). A few frequently asked questions about semantic or evaluative prosody. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14,139-158.
    28. MSF (2002). Ten years for the Rohingya refugees: Past, present, and future. Retrieved from https://www.msf.org/ten-years-rohingya-refugeespast-present-and-future-report-summary.
    29. MSF (2019). Timeline: A visual history of the Rohingya refugee crisis. Retrieved from https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/what-we-do/news-stories/news/timeline-visual-history-rohingya-refugee-crisis.
    30. Nahar (2019). The 2017 Rohingya crisis: A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of representation in The Daily Star. International Journal of Science and Humanity, 9(4).
    31. Ofcom (2019). News consumption in the UK: 2019. Retrieved from https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0027/157914/uk-news-consumption-2019-report.pdf.
    32. OHCHR(2014). Expert raises alarm on Rakhine State. OHCHR. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=14476&LangID=E.
    33. PAMCo (2020). About us. PAMCo. Retrieved fromhttps://pamco.co.uk/about-us/
    34. Pugh (2013). Is citizenship the answer? Constructions of belonging and exclusion for the stateless Rohingya of Burma. Centre on Migration, Policy and Society Working Paper No 107.
    35. Rychly, P. (2008). A lexicographer-friendly association score. Proceedings of Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing, RASLAN, 6-9.
    36. Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
    37. Scholz, R. (2019). Quantifying approaches to discourse for social scientists. Springer International Publishing.
    38. Siddiquee, M. (2019). The portrayal of the Rohingya genocide and refugee crisis in the age of post-truth politics. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics. 5, 89-103.
    39. Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus concordance collocation. Oxford University Press.
    40. Stubbs, M. (2001). Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. Blackwell.
    41. Tribble, C. (2010). What are concordances and how are they used? In A. O'Keefe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics. (pp.3–13). Routledge.
    42. Venkataraman, N.(2018). What’s not in a frame? Analysis of media representations of the environmental refugee. In M. Schroter & C. Taylor (Eds.). Exploring silence and absence in discourse –Empirical approaches. (pp.241-279). Palgrave.
    43. WHO (2019). Invisible: The Rohingyas, the crisis, the people and their health. World Health Organization.