Stories about nonhuman animals: a multimodal analysis of vegan campaigns
List of Authors
  • Kaur, Surinderpal , Rajandran, Kumaran , Zhdanava, Alena

Keyword
  • Multimodality, nonhuman animals, posters, stories, vegan

Abstract
  • Vegan campaigns are frequently seen nowadays due to the rise of veganism. When these campaigns create stories, i.e. cognitive models which influence how people think, talk and act, it is important to consider both language and images. This article presents findings from a multimodal analysis of the two vegan campaigns, Be Fair Be Vegan and Go Vegan World. The image analysis was conducted with Kress and van Leeuwen’s (2006) Grammar of Visual Design; the language analysis used van Leeuwen’s (2008) Social Actor and Action. The interpretation of stories adopted Stibbe’s (2015) framework for analysing. Findings from the language and image analyses include that such features related to nonhuman animals as specification, personalization, anthropomorphism, mental and material processes characterize the campaigns’ language, while the images show narrative and conceptual representation, highlight demand, featuring straight-on angle and close distance. The analysis of the campaigns’ language and images established that they create the stories of salience, ideology, and conviction which represent nonhuman animals as sentient beings, similar to humans in many ways.

Reference
  • 1. Adams, C. (2004). The Sexual Politics of Meat. New York: Continuum.
    2. Aggarwal, P., McGill, A. (2007). “Is that car smiling at me? Schema congruity as a basis for evaluating anthropomorphised products.” Journal of consumer research, 34, 468-479.
    3. Alger, J., Alger, S. (2003). Cat Culture: The Social World of a Cat Shelter.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
    4. Attfield, R. (2014). Environmental Ethics: an overview for the twenty-first century.Cambridge: Polity.
    5. Be Fair Be Vegan (2018). Why vegan. Retrieved from https://befairbevegan.com/why-vegan/
    6. Bekoff, M. (2000). “Animal emotions: exploring passionate natures.” Bioscience, 50(10), 861-870.
    7. Cole, M., Morgan, K. (2011). “Vegaphobia: derogatory discourses of veganism and the reproduction of speciesism in UK national newspapers.” The British Journal of Sociology, 62(1), 134-153.
    8. Freeman, C. (2010). “Framing Animal Rights in the “Go Veg” Campaigns of U.S. Animal Rights Organizations.” Society & Animals, 18(2), 163-182.
    9. Fusari, S. (2018). “Changing Representations of Animals in Canadian English (1920s –2010s).” Language and Ecology Online Journal. http://ecolinguistics-association.org/journal/4563035324Go
    10. Vegan World campaign (2018). What is veganism? Retrieved from https://goveganworld.com/what-is-veganism/
    11. Halliday, M. A. K. (1992). “How Do You Mean?” In M. Davies, & L. Ravelli (Eds.), Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice(pp. 20-35). London: Pinter Publishers.
    12. Jacobs, G., Teh, Joyce, M. (2016). “The presentation of animals in English as an additional language coursebooks.” Language and Ecology Online Journal. http://ecolinguistics-association.org/journal/4563035324
    13. Joy, M. (2011). Why We Love Dogs, EatPigs, and Wear Cows: an Introduction to Carnism. Conari Press.
    14. Kahn, M. (1992). The passive voice of Science. Language abuse in the wildlife profession. The Trumpeter 9(4), 152-154.
    15. Kress, G., van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (2nd edition). Oxon: Routledge.
    16. Lawrence, E. (1995). Cultural Perceptions of Differences between People and Animals: A Key to Understanding Human-animal Relationships.” The Journal of American Culture, 18: 75-82.
    17. Moore, A. (2014). “That could be me: Identity and identification in discourses about food, meat and animal welfare.” Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 9(1), 59-93.
    18. Naess, A. (1989). Ecology, community and lifestyle. Outline of an ecosophy. Cambridge University Press.
    19. Shapiro, K. (1995). “The caring sleuth: A qualitative analysis of animal rights activists.” Alternative Methods in Toxicology,11, 669–74.
    20. Silbergeld, E. K. (2019). One health and the agricultural transition in food animal production. Global transitions, 1, 2019, 83-92.
    21. Stibbe, A. (2001). “Language, power, and the social construction of animals.” Society and animals, 9(2), 145–162.
    22. Stibbe, A. (2003). As charming as a pig: The discursive construction of the relationship between pigs and humans. Society and Animals, 11(4): 375-392.
    23. Stibbe, A. (2012). Animals Erased: Discourse, Ecology, and Reconnection with the Natural World.Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
    24. Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By. New York, NY: Routledge
    25. .van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. The Vegan Society (2019). Definition of veganism. Retrieved from https://www.vegansociety.com/go-vegan/definition-veganism