Corpus stylistic analysis of Malaysian online columnists
List of Authors
  • Siti Aeisha Joharry , Syamimi Turiman

Keyword
  • Corpus linguistics, media discourse, online newspapers, corpus-assisted discourse analysis, stylistics

Abstract
  • Online media creates various platforms by which people can view and make sense of the world today. In this paper, two Malaysian columnists from two national English online portals: The Star Online and News Straits Times were selected for a corpus-assisted stylistics discourse analysis. Frequency lists were firstly compared between each columnist to identify salient words that are used by each writer. Initial observation shows that a number of words refer to law/policy [e.g. act, law(s)] and government/public (e.g. constitution, parliament). From the comparing wordlists feature, stylistic comparisons are further explored using Hyland’s (2005) interactional metadiscourse features. The use of the first-person pronoun ‘I’ was also investigated, which McNair (2008) regards as typical of commentary journalism. Although findings show that both columnists employ similar metadiscoursal features, Syahredzan projects a more assertive stance (I have, know) as opposed to John Teo who is more suggestive in style (I think, believe). Results thus present columnists’ style of writing, which are significant for readers when deciding on a piece of news and to be critically aware of how persuasiveness can be constructed in journalistic discourse.

Reference
  • 1. Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C. & McEnery, A. (2013). Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes: The representation of Islam in the British Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    2. Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyzanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse and Society, 19(3), 273–306.
    3. Bednarek, M. & Caple, H. (2014). Why do news values matter? Towards a new methodological framework for analysing news discourse in Critical Discourse Analysis and beyond. Discourse & Society, 25(2), 135–158.
    4. Bernstein, A., & Galily, Y. (2008). Games and sets: Women, media and sport in Israel. Nashim A Journal of Jewish Women’s Studies and Gender Issues, 15(1), 175–196.
    5. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S.& Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, England: Pearson Education.
    6. Bird, S. E.. (2011). Seeking the audience for news: Response, news talk, and everyday practices. In: V. Nightingale (ed.). The Handbook of Media Audiences. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 489–508.
    7. Coward, R. (2013). Speaking personally: The rise of subjective and confessional journalism. Hampshire: PalgraveMacmillan.
    8. Culpeper, J. (2002). Computers, language and characterisation: An Analysis of six characters in Romeo and Juliet. In: U. MelanderMarttala, C. Ostman and Merja Kyto (eds.), Conversation in Life and in Literature: Papers from the ASLA Symposium, Association Suedoise de Linguistique Appliquee (ASLA), 15. Universitetstryckeriet: Uppsala, 11–30.
    9. Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(1), 95-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.003
    10. Djerf-Pierre, M., & Shehata, A. (2017). Still an agenda setter: Traditional news media and public opinion during the transition from low to high choice media environments. Journal of Communication, 67 (5), 733–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12327
    11. Fairclough, N. (1995). Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
    12. Fu, X., & Hyland, K. (2014). Interaction in two journalistic genres: A study of interactional metadiscourse. English Text Construction, 7(1), 122–144.
    13. Khabbazi-Oskouei, L. (2013). Propositional or non-propositional, that is the question: A new approach to analyzing ‘interpersonal metadiscourse’ in editorials. Journal of Pragmatics, 47(1), 93–107.
    14. Hall, J. (2008). Online editions: newspapers and the ‘new’news. In Franklin, B. (Ed.), Pulling Newspapers Apart: Analysing Print Journalism (pp. 215–223). London: Routledge.
    15. Hunston, S. (2002). Methods in corpus linguistics: Beyondthe concordance line. In S. Hunston (Ed.), Corpora in applied linguistics (pp. 67–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    16. Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–191.
    17. Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing.Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 133–151.
    18. Jaworska, S., & Krishnamurthy, R. (2012). On the F word: A corpus-based analysis of the media representation of feminism in British and German press discourse, 1990–2009. Discourse & Society, 23(4), 401–431.
    19. Jaworska, S. (2016) Using a corpus assisted discourse studies (CADS) approach to investigate constructions of identities in media reporting surrounding mega sport events: The case of the London Olympics 2012. In: Lamond, I. R. and Platt, L. (Eds.) Critical Events Studies: Approaches to Research. Leisure Studies in a Global Era. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 149-174. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137523860_8. Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/43261/
    20. Mahlberg, M. (2013). Corpus Stylistics and Dickens's Fiction. London: Routledge.
    21. McEnery, T. & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus Linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    22. McNair, B.(2008). I, Columnist. In Franklin, B. (Ed.), Pulling Newspapers Apart: Analysing Print Journalism (pp. 106-114). London: Routledge.
    23. Mengyu, H.E., & Hajar, A.R. (2019). Comparing Engagement Markers in Economics Research Articles and Opinion Pieces: A Corpus-based Study. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 19 (2), 1-14. http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2019-1902-01
    24. Meikle, G. (2008). Naming and shaming: News satire and symbolic power. The Electronic Journalof Communication, 18(2, 3 & 4).Available at http://www.cios.org/www/ejc/EJCPUBLIC/018/2/01847.html
    25. Noorian, M, & Biria, R. (2014).Interpersonal Metadiscourse in Persuasive Journalism: A Study of Texts by American and Iranian EFL Columnists. Journal of Modern Linguistics, 20, 64–79.
    26. O'Halloran, K. (2010). How to use corpus linguistics in the study of media discourse. In O'Keeffe, Anne and McCarthy, Michael eds. The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics (pp. 563–577). Abingdon: Routledge.
    27. O’Keeffe, A. (2006). Invesitgating Media Discourse. London: Routledge.O’Keeffe, A. (2011). Media and Discourse Analysis. In: Gee, J. & Handford M. (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 441–454). London: Routledge.
    28. Partington, A. (2006). The linguistics of laughter: A corpus-assisted study of laughter-talk.
    29. London: Routledge.Partington, A., Duguid, A. & Taylor, C. (2013). Patterns and Meanings in Discourse. Theory and Practice in Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    30. Pape, S. & Featherstone, S. (2006). Feature Writing: A Practical Introduction. London: SAGE Publications.
    31. Reese, S. D., Rutigliano, L., Hyun,K., & Jeong, J. (2007). Mapping the blogosphere: Professional and citizen-based media in the global news arena. Journalism, 8(3), 235–261.
    32. Reuters Institute Digital News Report. (2018). Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
    33. Reuters Institute Digital News Report. (2019). Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
    34. Rogers, T. (2019, July 15). Differences between Broadsheet and Tabloid Newspapers. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/broadsheet-and-tabloid-newspapers-2074248
    35. Scott, M. (2012). WordSmith Tools version 6, Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.
    36. Semino, E. and Short, M. (2004). Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought. Presentation in a Corpus of English Writing. London: Routledge.
    37. Taylor, C. (2014) Investigating the representation of migrants in the UK and Italian press: A cross-linguistic corpus-assisted discourse analysis. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19 (3), 368-400.
    38. van Djik, T. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4 (2), 249-283.
    39. Vaughan, E. & O’Keeffe, A. (2015). Corpus Analysis. In K. Tracy, C. Ilie & T. Sandel (Eds.). The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction (pp. 252–268). Denver: John Wiley & Sons.
    40. Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA Is about—A Summary of Its History, Important Concepts and Its Developments. In W. R., & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 1–13. London: Sage.