Examining language development and revitalisation initiatives: the case of the Bidayuh language in Sarawak
List of Authors
  • Campbell, Yvonne Michelle , Riget, Patricia Nora

Keyword
  • Indigenous language, revitalization initiatives, Bidayuh language, Sarawak, Iban 1. IntroductionEberhard, Simons, and Fennig(2019) list 134 living languages in Malaysia, of which 95 are considered to be threatened, while 15 are dying (S

Abstract
  • This article examines development and revitalisation initiatives for the Bidayuh language, spoken in Sarawak, East Malaysia. Bidayuh has six main variants which are not mutually intelligible. In addition, it is mainly used in rural settings and is not the main language of choice in mixed marriages. Moreover, Bidayuh did not have a standardised orthography until 2003. These factors have affected the development of the language, which is to be contrasted with the Iban language, spoken by the main ethnic group in Sarawak, which is currently offered in primary schools as Pupil’s Own Language (POL) and as an elective subject in the secondary school Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) examination. The focus of this article is the language development and revitalization initiatives undertaken by various stakeholders between 1963 (the year of the formation of the Federation of Malaysia) and today. Special attention will be paid to the outcome of the Multilingual Education (MLE) project, which is an extension of the Bidayuh Language Development Project (BLDP) initiated by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) in Asia, and undertaken by the Summer Institute of Linguistics (SIL) and the Dayak Bidayuh National Association (DBNA). Interviews with representatives of the community were conducted to discover their perceptions towards these initiatives, and to identify factors that might contribute to their success and/or failure. The article ends with some suggestions about how to improve the success of language revitalisation initiatives for Bidayuh.

Reference
  • 1. Ariffin Omar & Teoh, B. S. (1994). Marginalization of language: The case of Iban in Sarawak. In. P. W. Martin (Ed.), Shifting patterns of language use in Borneo. Papers from the Second Biennial International Conference, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia (pp.117-129). Williamsburg, VA: Borneo Research Council.
    2. Asmah Haji Omar. (1987). Malay in its sociocultural context. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
    3. Asmah Haji Omar. (2004). Encyclopedia of Malaysia: Languages and literature(Vol. 9). Singapore: Editions Didier Millet.
    4. Asmah Haji Omar. (2017). Safe and unsafe languages: A focus on languages in Malaysia, In Asmah Haji Omar & Norazuna Norahim (Eds.), Linguistic minorities: Their existence and identity within larger communities(pp. 11-25). Kuching: University Malaysia Sarawak Press.
    5. Bonggara, M. & Josak Siam, (2017). The Bidayuh language development and preservation project: A review. In M. Bongarra, M. Arritt & F. G. Kayad, (Eds.), Selected papers of the Bidayuh language development and preservation project (2003-2017)(pp.79-94). Kuching, Malaysia: Dayak Bidayuh National Association.
    6. Bongarra, M., Kayad, F. G., & Campbell, Y. M. (2017). The Bidayuh –languages or dialects? In M. Bongarra, M. Arritt & F. G. Kayad (Eds.), Selected papers of the Bidayuh language development and preservation project (2003-2017) (pp. 207-220). Kuching, Malaysia: Dayak Bidayuh National Association.
    7. Buku Tahunan Perangkaan Sarawak. (2014). Jabatan Perangkaan Malaysia Negeri Sarawak.
    8. Chang, P. F. (2002). History of Bidayuh in Kuching Division. Kuching, Malaysia: Lee Ming Press.
    9. Collins, J. (Ed.) (1993). Language and oral traditions in Borneo.Borneo Research Council proceedings series. Williamsburg, VA: Borneo Research Council.
    10. Coluzzi, P. (2017). The vitality of minority languages in Malaysia. Oceanic Linguistics, 56(1), 210-225.
    11. Coluzzi, P., Riget, P. N., & Wang, X. (2013). Language vitality among the Bidayuh of Sarawak (East Malaysia). Oceanic Linguistics, 52(2), 375-95.
    12. Coluzzi, P., Riget, P. N., & Wang, X. (2017). Language vitality among the Orang Asli of Malaysia: The case of the Mah Meri on Telo’ Gunjeng (Carey Island, Selangor). International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 244, 137-161.
    13. Coluzzi, P., Riget, P. N., & Kitade, R. (2018). Is the Baba Nyonya a doomed minority? A preliminary study on the vitality of Baba Malay in Melaka (Malaysia) In R. Vollmann (Ed.), Graz Linguistic Studies 89: Multilingual Malaysian Chinese (pp. 111-139).
    14. Graz, Austria: Institut fur Spracwissenschaft des Universitat Graz.Dealwis, C. (2008). Language choice among the Dayak Bidayuh undergraduates. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Malaya, Malaysia.
    15. Dealwis, C. (2010, March). Language choices of educated younger generation of Bidayuh at home. Paper presented at the 7thInternational Malaysian Studies Conference, Penang, Malaysia.
    16. Dundon, S. J. (1989). Bidayuh language and dialect. Sarawak Museum Journal, 30, 408-409.
    17. Eberhard, D. M., Simons, G. F., & Fennig, C. D. (Eds.). (2019). Ethnologue: Languages of the world(22nd edn.). Dallas, TX: SIL International. Retrieved from http://www.ethnologue.com.
    18. Hood Salleh (Ed.). (2006). Encyclopedia of Malaysia: People and traditions (Vol. 12). Singapore: Editions Didier Millet.
    19. Hudson, A. B. (1970). A note on Selako: Malayic Dayak and Land Dayak languages in western Borneo. Sarawak Museum Journal, 18, 301-318.
    20. Joyik, I. P., Siam, J., Tan, G., Bongarra, M., & Simpson, S. E. (2017).The Bidayuh first language-based multilingual education programme. In M. Bongarra, M. Arritt & F. G. Kayad, (Eds.), Selected papers of the Bidayuh language development and preservation project (2003-2017)(pp. 67-78). Kuching, Malaysia: Dayak Bidayuh National Association.
    21. Kayad, F.G.,& Arritt, M. (2017). The Bidayuh languages in primary schools through the Ethnic Language Curriculum. In M. Bongarra, M. Aritt & F.G. Kayad (Eds.), Selected papers of the Bidayuh Language Development and Preservation Project (2009-2017) (pp. 95-106). Kuching, Malaysia: DBNA.
    22. Lewis, M. P., & Simons, G. F. (2010). Assessing endangerment: Expanding Fishman’s GIDS. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique/Romanian Review of Linguistics, 55(2). Retrieved from http://www.lingv.ro/resources/scm_images/RRL-02-2010-Lewis.pdf
    23. McLellan, J. (1992). Questions of language choice for speakers of Bau-Jagoi Bidayuh: A micro-analysis. In P. Martin (Ed.), Shifting patterns of language use in Borneo (pp. 195-208). Williamsburgh, VA: Borneo Research Council.
    24. McLellan, J. (2002). Insider/outsider approaches to the study of language maintenance and language shift in the context of Borneo. In M. K. David (Ed.), Methodological and analytical issues in language maintenance and language shift studies (pp. 79-89). Frankurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
    25. McLellan, J. (2016). English and other languages in the online discourse of East Malaysia.In T. Yamaguchi & D. Deterding (Eds.), English in Malaysia: Current use and status (pp. 125-144). Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.
    26. McLellan, J.,& Campbell, Y. M. (2015). Bidayuh as a subject at pre-school and primary levels: A review of moves towards a greater role for a Borneo indigenous languagein the Malaysian education system. In C. Volker & F. Anderson (Eds.), Education in languages of lesser power: An Asian-Pacific perspective (pp. 131-151). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
    27. McLellan, J., & Nojeg, R. (2009). Lexical choice and 3-way code switching in Bau-Jagoi Bidayuh discourse. In M. K. David, S. Rafik-Galea, J.McLellan & Ain Nadzimah Abdullah (Eds.), Code switching in Malaysia (pp. 49-60). Frankfurt am Mein, Germany: Peter Lang.
    28. Minos, P. (2000). The future of the Dayak Bidayuhs in Malaysia. Kuching, Malaysia: Lynch Media and Services.
    29. Nais, W. (1989). Overview of the Bidayuh culture. The Sarawak Museum Journal. Special Issue No. 4(II), 367-371.
    30. Noeb, J., & Ridu, R. S.(2017). Language development in Bidayuh: Past, present and future. In M. Bongarra, M. Arritt & F. G. Kayad (Eds.), Selected papers of the Bidayuh language development and preservation project (2003-2017) (pp. 3-46). Kuching, Malaysia: Dayak Bidayuh National Association.
    31. Norazuna Norahim. (2010). Language choice of Bidayuh graduates in Kuching-Samarahan Division(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Malaya, Malaysia
    32. .Norazuna Norahim. (2017). Bidayuh as a threatened language. In Asmah HajiOmar & Norazuna Norahim (Eds.) Linguistic Minorities: Their existence and identity within larger communities (pp.37-60). Kota Samarahan, Malaysia: UNIMAS Publisher.
    33. Obiero, O. J. (2010). From assessing language endangerment or vitality to creating and evaluating language revitalization programmes. Nordic Journal of African Studies,19(4), 201-226.
    34. Rensch, C. R., Rensch, C. M., Noeb, J., & Ridu, R. S. (2006). The Bidayuh language: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Kuching, Malaysia: Dayak Bidayuh National Association.
    35. Rensch, C. R., Rensch, C. M., Noeb, J., & Ridu, R. S. (2012). The Bidayuh language: Yesterday, today and tomorrow(Revised and expanded edn.). Kota Samarahan, Malaysia: SIL International.
    36. Simons, G. F., & Fennig, C. D. (2018). Ethnologue: Languages of the world. (21stedn.). Dallas, TX: SIL International.Smith, J. A., & Smith, J. (2017). Indigenous language development in East Malaysia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language: Language Planning and Multilingual Malaysia, 244, 119-135.
    37. Songan, P.(2004, August). Importance of education: The Bidayuh perspective.Paper presented at DBNA Serian Education Seminar: The Way Forward, Regency Rajah Court Hotel, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia.doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1411.2404
    38. Ting, S.-H., & Campbell Y. M. (2017). The role of indigenous languages in schools: The case of Sarawak. In M. Samuel, M.T. Tee & L. P. Symaco (Eds.), Education in Malaysia: Development and challenges (pp. 119-136). Singapore, Singapore: Springer.
    39. Walsh, M. (2010). Why language revitalisation sometimes works. In J. Hobson, K. Lowe, K., S. Poetsch & M. Walsh (Eds.), Re-awakening languages theory and practice in the revitalisation of Australia’s Indigenous languages(pp. 22-36), Sydney, Australia: Sydney University Press. Retrieved fromhttps://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/41235012.pdf