Conventionalised impoliteness towards Perceived ESL Users on 4chan
List of Authors
  • Mohamad Ammar Rosli

Keyword
  • Conventionalised impoliteness, anonymity, and language-based discrimination

Abstract
  • Siegel (2018) suggests that language can be used as an identity marker for an individual. This seems to be the case on 4chan, an anonymous image board where certain users are labelled as ‘ESL’ even though there are no information regarding their ethnicity, nationality, or languages spoken. Users who are perceived to be incompetent in English are labelled with the term and are usually discriminated against through the use of impoliteness. Analysis of the data shows that different categories of impoliteness are used against perceived ESL users to isolate, exclude and mock them. It is also shown that the phenomenon studied could be regarded as a form of language based discrimination, as perceived ESL users are identified and singled out by 4chan users based on language.

Reference
  • 1. Bernstein, M. S., Monroy-Hernández, A., Harry, D., André, P., Panovich, K., & Vargas, G. G. (2011, July). 4chan and/b: An Analysis of Anonymity and Ephemerality in a Large Online Community. In ICWSM (pp. 50-57).
    2. Bousfield, D. (2010). Impoliteness in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    3. Christopherson, K. M. (2007). The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Internet social interactions: “On the Internet, Nobody Knows You’re a Dog”. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 3038-3056. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.09.001
    4. Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 349-367. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3
    5. Culpeper, J. (2005). Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 1(1). doi:10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35
    6. Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    7. Culpeper, J., Bousfield, D., & Wichmann, A. (2003). Impoliteness revisited: with special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(10-11), 1545-1579.
    8. Jacoby, S., & Ochs, E. (1995). Co-construction: An introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(3), 171-183.
    9. Ludemann, D. (2018). /pol/emics: Ambiguity, scales, and digital discourse on 4chan. Discourse, Context & Media. doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2018.01.010
    10. Matsuda, P. K. (2002). Negotiation of identity and power in a Japanese online discourse community. Computers and Composition, 19(1), 39-55.
    11. Marshall, S. (2009). Re-becoming ESL: Multilingual university students and a deficit identity. Language and Education, 24(1), 41-56.
    12. Ng, S. H. (2007). Language-based discrimination. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(2), 106-122. doi:10.1177/0261927x07300074
    13. Nishimura, Y. (2010). Impoliteness in Japanese BBS interactions: Observations from message exchanges in two online communities. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 6(1). doi:10.1515/jplr.2010.003
    14. Phillips, W. (2016). This is why we can’t have nice things: Mapping the relationship between online trolling and mainstream culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    15. Sanjek, R., & Tratner, S. W. (2016). EFieldnotes: The makings of anthropology in the digital world. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    16. Sanner, S., & Wilson, A. (2008). The experiences of students with English as a second language in a baccalaureate nursing program. Nurse Education Today, 28(7), 807-813.
    17. Siegel, J. S. (2018). Demographic and socioeconomic basis of ethnolinguistics. London: Springer.
    18. Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321-326.