The effect of writing prompts on developing argumentative essays of Iranian university students of English
List of Authors
  • Don, Alexanne , Jalilifar, Alireza , Keyvan, Marjan

Keyword
  • Academic writing, writing prompts, argumentative essays, Toulmin's model

Abstract
  • This study aims to explore the effect of prompts as themes on developing argumentative essays that represent an important genre of academic writing. Thirty Iranian Master's students of English Language Teaching and Literature took part in three consecutive test sessions arranged in this research. In each session, the students were divided into two groups: one provided with a writing prompt as a theme and the other without any prompts. The compositions were then rated and examined to find the possible effect of writing prompts on the students' scores and the quality of their argumentative essays. At the same time, the relationship between the students' scores and the organisation of the essays was checked based on a model of argument structure. The results revealed that writing prompts did not have any remarkable effect on the students' scores and the quality of their argumentation. However, regarding the elements of the model, a strong positive relationship was detected between the scores and the frequency of occurrence of elements. Further research is needed to identify features which are likely to influence writing performance and improve argumentation.

Reference
  • 1. Bailey, S. (2006). Academic writing: A handbook for international students. London: Routledge.
    2. Baker, J., Brizee, A., & Angeli, E. (2013). Argumentative essays. Retrieved from https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/685/05/.
    3. Brossell, G. (1983). Rhetorical specification in essay examination topics. College English, 45(2), 165–173.
    4. Brossell, G., & Ash, B. H. (1984). An experiment with the wording of essay topics. College Composition and Communication, 35, 423-425.
    5. Brown, J. D., Hilgers, T., & Marsella, J. (1991). Essay prompts and topics. Written Communication, 8, 533-556.
    6. Cambridge IELTS 2: Examination papers from University of Cambridge, ESOL examinations. (2000). New York: Cambridge University Press
    7. Cambridge IELTS 3: Examination papers from the University of Cambridge, Local Examination Syndicate. (2002). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    8. Cambridge IELTS 4: Examination papers from University of Cambridge, ESOL Examinations. (2005). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    9. Cambridge IELTS 5: Examination papers from University of Cambridge, ESOL Examinations. (2006). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    10. Cambridge IELTS 6: Examination papers from University of Cambridge, ESOL Examinations. (2007). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    11. Cambridge IELTS 7: Official examination papers from University of Cambridge, ESOL examinations. (2009). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    12. Cambridge IELTS 8: Official examination papers from University of Cambridge, ESOL examinations. (2011). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    13. Cambridge IELTS 9: Authentic examination papers from University of Cambridge, ESOL examinations. (2013). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    14. Crammond, J. (1998). The uses and complexity of argument structures in expert and student persuasive writing. Written Communication, 15, 230-268.
    15. Crossley, S. A., Varner, L. K., & McNamara, D. S. (2013). Cohesion-based prompt effects in argumentative writing. In C. Boonthum-Denecke & G. M. Youngblood (Eds.), The Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (pp. 202-207). AAAI Press.
    16. Cumming, A., Kantor, R., Baba, K., Erdosy, U., Eouanzoui, K., & James, M. (2005). Differences in written discourse in independent and integrated prototype tasks for next generation TOEFL. Assessing Writing, 10, 5–43.
    17. Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). Tapping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88, 915–933.
    18. Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding students' problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51, 21–38.
    19. Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding ill-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52, 5–22.
    20. Gholami, J., Rafsanjani Nejad, S. & Looragi Pour, J. (2014). Metadiscourse markers misuses; a Study of EFL Learners' Argumentative Essays. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 580-589.
    21. Greenberg, K. (1981). The effects of variations in essay questions on the writing performance of CUNY freshman. New York: Instructional Resource Center
    22. Hatch, E. & Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for supplied linguistics. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
    23. Hewings, M. (2010). Materials for university essay writing. In N. Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching materials (pp. 251–278). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    24. Hirose, K. (2003). Comparing L1 and L2 organizational patterns in the argumentative writing of Japanese EFL students. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 181-209.
    25. Hoetker, J. (1982). Essay examination topics and student writing. College Composition and Communication, 33, 377-392.
    26. Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    27. Hult, C. A. (1987). Assessment topics: The importance of the rhetorical frame. Writing Program Administration, 10, 19-28.
    28. Huot, B. (1990). The literature of direct writing assessment: Major concerns and prevailing trends. Review of Educational Research, 60(2), 237-263.
    29. Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    30. Ka-kan-deea, M. & Kaur, S., (2015). Teaching Strategies Used by Thai EFL Lecturers to Teach Argumentative Writing. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 208,143-156.
    31. Kobayashi, H., & Rinnert, C. (2008). Task response and text construction across L1 and L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 7-29.
    32. Lea, M., & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23, 157–172.
    33. McAndrew, D. A. (1982). The effects of an assigned rhetorical context on the syntax and holistic quality of the writing of first year college students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 43, 2911 A.
    34. McCann, T., (1989). Student argumentative writing knowledge and ability at three grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 23, 62-76.
    35. Mitchell, S., Prior, P., Bilbro, R., Peake, K., See, B. H., & Andrews, R. (2008). A reflexive approach to interview data in an investigation of argument. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 31, 229–241.
    36. Nippold, M. A., Ward-Lonergan, J. M., & Fanning, J. L. (2005). Persuasive writing in children, adolescents, and adults: a study of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic development. LSHSS, 36(2), 125-38.
    37. Nussbaum, E. M., & Kardash, C. A. M. (2005). The effects of goal instructions and text on the generation of counterarguments during writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 157-169.
    38. Polio, C., & Glew, M. (1996). ESL writing assessment prompts: How students choose. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), 35–49.
    39. Qin, J., & Karabacak, E. (2010). The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing. System, 38, 444-456.
    40. Ramage, J. D., Bean, J. C., & Johnson, J. J. (2012). Writing argument: A rhetorical with readings (9th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Publications.
    41. Smith, W. L., Hull, G. A., Land, R. E., Moore, M. T., Ball, C. & Dunham, D. (1985). Some effects of varying the structure of a topic on college students' writing. Written Communication, 2, 73-89.
    42. Soleymanzadeha, L. & Gholamib, J. (2014). Scoring argumentative essays based on thematic progression patterns and IELTS analytic scoring criteria. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1811-1819.
    43. Stapleton, P. (2001). Assessing critical thinking in the writing of Japanese university students: Insights about assumptions and content familiarity. Written Communication, 18, 506-548.
    44. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    45. Toulmin, S., Reike, R., & Janik, A. (1984). An introduction to reasoning (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
    46. Varghese, S. A. & Abraham, S. A., (1998). Undergraduates arguing a case. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 287-306.
    47. Weigle, S. C. (1999). Investigating rater/prompt interactions in writing assessment: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Assessing Writing, 6(2), 145-l 78.
    48. Wu, R. R. (2013). Native and non-native students' interaction with a text-based prompt. Assessing Writing, 18, 202–217.
    49. Yeh, S., (1998). Empowering education: Teaching argumentative writing to cultural minority middle-school students. Research in the Teaching of English, 33, 49-83.