A comparative study of multimodality in English and Persian spam letters of advertising
List of Authors
  • Jalilifar, Alireza

Keyword
  • Spam letter, advertisement, image mode, language mode, rhetorical figures, multimodality

Abstract
  • The aim of this study is to identify patterns of multimodality and determine whether these patterns relate in any way to social and religious statuses of the Persian and English communities. To this end, by sending an announcement to an Iranian social network, network users were requested to forward their spam letters to one of the researchers' emails. Then, 70 Persian and 70 English spam letters were randomly selected for the rhetorical analysis of the language mode and the image mode. The results of the study indicated that for the image mode, similar strategies were utilized in both Persian and English spam letters. However, some general distinctions were found in the images. For the language mode, clear differences were observed in the employment of rhetorical figures between the spams. Distinctions rooted in cultural and religious values account for the differences in applying the strategies for the image and language modes.

Reference
  • 1. Ahmed, N. (2000). Cross-cultural content analysis of advertising from the United States and India. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi, The graduate school.
    2. Barron, A. (2006). Understanding spam: A macro-textual analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 880-904.
    3. Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse. London: Continuum. Boddewyn, J., Soehl, R., & Picard, J. (1986). Standardization in international marketing: Is Ted Levitt in fact right? Business Horizons, 29, 69-75.
    4. Budge, S. B. (2006). To deceive the receiver: A genre analysis of the electronic variety on Nigerian scam letters. MA thesis, Växjö University, School of humanities, English department.
    5. Clark, B. E. (1998) Rhetorical figures. Retrieved from: http://www.megabrands.com/carroll/faq3.html.
    6. Eckkrammer, E. M. (2004). Drawing on theories of inter-semiotic layering to analyse multimodality in medical self-counselling texts and hypertexts. In E. Ventola, C. Charles & M. Kaltenbacher (Eds.), Perspectives on multimodality (pp. 211-226). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    7. El-daly, H. M. (2011). Toward an understanding of the discourse of advertising: Review of research with special reference to the Egyptian media. African Nebula. 3, 25-47.
    8. Goddard, A. (2002). The language of advertising. London and New York: Routledge.
    9. Gregorio-Godeo, E. D. (2009). British men's magazines' scent advertising and the multimodal discursive construction of masculinity: A preliminary study. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense Journal, 17, 9-36.
    10. Gully, A. (1996). The discourse of Arabic advertising preliminary investigations. Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies 1, 1-49.
    11. Jalilifar, A. (2010). The rhetoric of Persian and English advertisements. The International Journal of Language, Society and Culture, 30, 25-39.
    12. Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York: Doubleday.
    13. Kalliny, M., & Gentry, L. (2007). Cultural values reflected in Arab and American television advertising. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, (1), 15-32.
    14. Koteyko, N., & Nerlich, B. (2007). Multimodal discourse analysis of probiotic web advertising. The International Journal of Language, Society and Culture, 23, 20 -31.
    15. Kramsch, C. (2004). Language, thought and culture. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 235-261). Oxford: Blackwell.
    16. Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images. New York: Routledge.
    17. Lirola, M. M., & Chovanec, J. (2012). The dream of a perfect body come true: Multimodality in cosmetic surgery advertising. Discourse and Society, 23, 487-507.
    18. McCarty, J., & Hattwick, P. (1992). Cultural value orientations: A comparison of magazine advertisements from the United States and Mexico. Advances in Consumer Research, 19, 34-38.
    19. Plescher, C. (2010). The role of word-formation and multimodality in printed advertising media. MA thesis, Universität Wien, Lehramtsstudium UF Englisch UF Psychologie und Philosophie, Wien.
    20. Rajandran, K. (2009). Multimodality in Malaysian commercial bank brochures. UCSI University. CÍRCULO de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación (clac) Journal, 37, 45-63.
    21. Sharifian, F. (2013). Globalization and developing metacultural competence in learning English as an international language. Multilingual Education, 3, 1-11.
    22. Srikandath, S. (1991). Cultural values depicted in Indian television advertising. Gazette, 48(3), 165-176.
    23. Steininger, M. Y. (2013). The United States and Iran. University Press of America.
    24. Stöckl, H. (2004). In between modes. In E. Ventola, C. Charles & M. Kaltenbacher (Eds.), Perspectives on multimodality (pp. 9-30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    25. Tahmasbi, S., & Ghorgani, S.K. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: Iranian banks advertisements. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 3(1), 124-145.
    26. Triristina, N. (2012). The multimodality concept used in the Djarum L.A. lights cigarette advertisement billboard in central Surabaya. Anglicist Magazine, 1, 27-32.
    27. Zhang, Y., & Gelb, B. D. (1996). Matching advertising appeals to culture: The influence of products' use condition. Journal of Advertising, 25 (3), 29-46.