Persian clitics: doubling and agreement
List of Authors
  • Rasekh, Mohammad

Keyword
  • Pronominal clitics, agreement markers, clitic-doubling, grammaticalization, blocking principle

Abstract
  • In this paper, different functions of Persian pronominal enclitics in verbal domain are discussed. Traditionally, it has been supposed that these enclitics act as arguments, while it is argued here that they act as agreement markers as well. As they have moved from Wackernagel’s position toward verb adjacent position in different stages of Persian language history, their functions have also changed. Through grammaticalization, they have acquired a new role as subject agreement markers. They may also act as objects in clitic doubling structures, when the optional NP object acts as topic. The new role of these clitics is explained by the blocking principle, which shows how a language acquires new verbal agreement formatives only for the non-distinctive slots of the agreement paradigm.

Reference
  • 1. Anderson, S. R. (1992). A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    2. Anderson, S. R. (1993). Wackernagel’s revenge: Clitics, morphology and the syntax of second Position. Language, 69, 68–98.
    3. Anderson, S. R. (2004). Subject clitics and verb-second in Surmiran Rumantsch. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 47, 1–22.
    4. Anderson, S. R., (2005). Aspects of the theory of clitics. Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press.
    5. Baker, M. C. (1995). The polysynthesis parameter. New York: Oxford University Press.
    6. Baker, M. (2008). The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge: CUP.
    7. Barjasteh, D. (1983). Morphology, syntax, and semantics of Persian compound verbs: A lexicalist approach. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
    8. Borer, H. (Ed.) (1986). The syntax of pronominal clitics. Syntax & semantics Vol.19. Orlando: Academic Press.
    9. Brandenstein, W., & Mayrhofer M. (1964). Handbuch des Altpersischen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
    10. Bresnan, J., Mchombo, S., 1987. Topic, pronoun, and agreement in Chichewâ. Language 63 (4), 741–
    781.
    11. Bresnan, J. (1997). The emergence of the unmarked pronoun: Chicheŵa pronominals in optimality theory. Berkeley Linguistic Society, 23. Retrieved September 15, 2014 from http://wwwlfg.stanford.edu/archive/archive.html
    12. Bresnan, J. (2001). The emergence of the unmarked pronoun. In G. Legendre, J. Grimshaw, & S. Vikner (Eds), Optimality-Theoretic Syntax (pp. 113–142). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
    13. Brunner, C. (1977). A syntax of Western Middle Iranian. Delmar, New York: Caravan.
    14. Carstairs, A. (1981). Notes on affixes, clitics and paradigms. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
    15. Corbett, G. (2003). Agreement: The range of the phenomenon and the principles of the Surrey Database of Agreement. Transactions of the Philological Society, 101 (2), 155–202.
    16. Dabir Moghaddam, M. (1992). On the (in)dependence of syntax and pragmatics: Evidence from the postposition –râ in Persian. In Dieter Stein (Ed.), Cooperating with written texts: The pragmatics and comprehension of written texts (pp. 549–573). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    17. Dabir Moghaddam, M. (1997). Compound verbs in Persian. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 27(2), 25–59.
    18. De Cat, C. (2005). French subject clitics are not agreement markers. Lingua, 115, 1195–1219.
    19. De Cat, C. (2007). French dislocation: interpretation, syntax and acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    20. Dixon, R. M W. (1994). Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    21. Dobrovie-Sorin, C. (1993). The syntax of Romanian: Comparative studies in Romance. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    22. Fuß, E. (2005). The rise of agreement, a formal approach to the syntax and grammaticalization of verbal inflection. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publication Company.
    23. Ghomeshi, J. (1996). Projection and inflection: A study of Persian phrase structure. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto.
    24. Givōn, T. (1976). Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In Li, C. (Ed.), Subject and Topic (pp. 149–211). New York: Academic Press.
    25. Good, J., & Yu, C. L. (2005). Morphosyntax of two Turkish subject pronominal paradigms. In Heggie, L. & Ordonez, F. (Eds.), Clitic and affix combinations, theoretical perspectives. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    26. Haig, G. (2008). Alignment change in Iranian languages, a construction grammar approach. Berlin: Mouton.
    27. Harris, A.C., & Campbell, L. (1995). Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    28. Haverkort, M. (1993). Clitics and parametrization: Case studies in the interaction of head movement phenomena. Ph.D. dissertation, Tilburg University. Distributed as ESF EUROTYP Working Papers VIII, 2.
    29. Heston, W. L (1976). Selected problems in fifth to tenth century Iranian syntax. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
    30. Hopper, P., & Traugott, E. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    31. Jaeggli, O. (1982). Topics in Romance syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
    32. Kallulli, D., & Tasmowski, L. (Eds.) (2008). Clitic doubling in the Balkan languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    33. Karimi, S. (2003). On object positions, specificity and scrambling in Persian. In Karimi, S. (Ed.), Word order and scrambling (pp. 91–124). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    34. Kayne, R. (1989). Null subjects and clitic climbing. In O. Jaeggli & K. Safir (Eds.), The null subject parameter (pp. 239-261). Dordrecht: Reidel.
    35. Kent, R. (1953). Old Persian. New Haven, Connecticut: American Oriental Society [second revised edition].
    36. Klavans, J.L. (1982). Some problems in a theory of clitics. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
    37. Klavans, J.L. (1985). The independence of syntax and phonology in cliticization. Language, 61, 95–120.
    38. Lazard, G. (1957). Grammaire du Persian contemorain. Paris: Librairie c. Klincksiek.
    39. Labelle, M. (2008). Pronominal object markers in Bantu and Romance. In C. De Cat, & K. Demuth (Eds.) The Bantu-Romance connection: A comparative investigation of verbal agreement, DPs, and information structure (pp. 83–109). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    40. Nevis, J.A. (1985). Finnish particle clitics and general clitic theory. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University.
    41. Pappas, P.A. (2004). Variation and morphosyntactic change in Greek. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
    42. Rivas, A. (1977). A theory of clitics. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
    43. Roberts, T. (1997). The optimal second position in Pashto. In G. Booij, & J. Van De Weijer (Eds.), Phonology in progress: Progress in phonology, HIL Phonology Papers III (pp. 367–401). The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
    44. Roberts, T. (2000). Clitics and agreement. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.
    45. Roberts, I., & Roussou, A. (2003). Syntactic change. A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    46. Russi, C. (2008). Italian clitics, an empirical study. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    47. Samvelian, P., & Tseng, J. (2010). Persian object clitics and the syntax-morphology interface. In S. Muller (Ed.), Proceedings of the HPSG10 Conference (pp. 212–232). Paris: CSLI publications.
    48. Sedighi, A. (2005). Subject-predicate agreement restrictions in Persian. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Ottawa.
    49. Sims-Williams, N. (1981). Notes on Manichaean Middle Persian morphology. Studia Iranica 10, 165–176.
    50. Stateva, P. (2002). Possessive clitics and the structure of nominal expressions. Lingua, 112, 647–690.
    51. Strozer, J. (1976). Clitics in Spanish. Ph.D. Dissertation, UCLA, Los Angeles.
    52. Szemerényi, O. (1996). Introduction to Indo-European linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    53. Taghavipour, M.A. (2005). Persian relative clauses in head-driven phrase structure grammar. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Essex.
    54. Thacktson, J. W. (1983). An introduction to Persian. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
    55. Travis, L. (1984). Parameters and effects of word order variation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
    56. Vincent, N. (2001). LFG as a model of syntactic change. In M. Butt, & T. Holloway King (Eds.), Time over matter. Diachronic perspectives on morphosyntax, (pp. 1–42). Stanford: CSLI.
    57. Wackernagel, J. (1892). Über ein Gesetz der Indo-Germanischen Wortstellung. Indogermanische Forschungen, 1, 333–436.
    58. Windfuhr, G. (1992). Case. In E.Yarshater (Ed.), Encyclopædia Iranica, Vol V (pp. 25–37). California: Mazda. – Cited on pp. 92 and 133.
    59. Woolford, E. (2003). Clitics and agreement in competition: Ergative cross-referencing pattern. In A.
    Carpenter, A. Coetzee, & P. Lacy (Eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory II (pp. 421–449). Amherst, MA: GLSA.
    60. Zwicky, A.M. (1977). On clitics. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
    61. Zwicky, A.M. (1985). Clitics and particles. Language, 61 (2), 283–305.
    62. Zwicky, A.M., & Pullum, G.K. (1983). Cliticization vs. inflection: English n’t. Language, 59 (3), 502–513.