Natural syntax: an introduction and application to special linguistic properties
List of Authors
  • Orešnik, Janez

Keyword
  • naturalness, syntax, transitivity, English, African languages, Australian languages

Abstract
  • Natural Syntax is a pseudo-deductive linguistic theory, and this is its most recent version. The naturalness judgements are couched in naturalness scales, which follow from the basic parameters (or “axioms”) listed at the beginning of this paper. The predictions of the theory are calculated in what are known as deductions, the chief components of each being a pair of naturalness scales and the rules governing the alignment of corresponding naturalness values. Parallel and chiastic alignment are distinguished and related to Henning Andersen’s early work on markedness. The basic idea is to illustrate how a (pseudo)deductive theory of syntax performs if it insists on avoiding abstract solutions, and in particular on excluding any generative component. Natural Syntax is exemplified here with (mostly individual) cases from the following languages: Chichewa, Gunin, Kambera, Northern Sotho, Saliba, Slovenian, Southern Tiwa, Wakiman, and Welsh.

Reference
  • Allen, B. J., & Frantz, D. G. (1978). Verb agreement in Southern Tiwa. In J. Jaeger, A.C. Woodbury, F. Ackerman, C. Chiarello, O.D. Gensler, J. Kingston, E.E. Sweetser, H. Thompson & K.W. Whitler (eds.). Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society (pp. 11-17). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society.
    Allen, B. J., & Frantz, D. G. (1983). Advancements and verb agreement in Southern Tiwa. In D. Perlmutter (ed.). Studies in relational grammar (pp. 303−314). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Andersen, H. (1972). Diphthongization. Language, 48, 11–50.
    Baker, M. (1988). Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Bešter, M. (1998). “Govorjenje na fanta” v gorenjskem narečju. In E. Kržišnik (ed.). XXXXIV. seminar slovenskega jezika, literature in kulture. Ljubljana: Filozofska fakulteta.
    Collins Cobuild English Grammar. (1990). London: Harper Collins.
    Cvetko-Orešnik, V., & Orešnik, J. (2009). Natural syntax: Expressions of future time. In S. Franks, V. Chidambaram & B. Joseph (eds.). A linguist’s linguist: Studies in South Slavic linguistics in honor of E. Wayles Browne (pp. 167-187). Bloomington, IN: Slavica.
    Havers, W. (1931). Handbuch der erklärenden syntax. Heidelberg: Winter.
    Kilani-Schoch, M. & Dressler, W.U. (2005). Morphologie naturelle et flexion du verbe français. Tübingen: Narr.
    Klamer, M. (1994). Kambera: A language of eastern Indonesia. Amsterdam: Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.
    Lowrens, L., Kosch, I.M. & Kotzè, A.E. (1995). Northern Sotho. Munich: Lincom Europa.
    Mayerthaler, W. (1981). Morphologische natürlichkeit. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.
    McGregor, W.B. (1993). Gunin/Kwini. Munich: Lincom Europa.
    Mosel, U. (1994). Saliba. Munich: Lincom Europa.
    Orešnik, J. (2009a). Transitivity in natural syntax: Accusative languages. Poznan studies in contemporary linguistics, 45, 405−46.
    Orešnik, J. (2009b). Transitivity in natural syntax: Ergative languages. Linguistica, 49, 65−93.
    Orešnik, J. (2009c). Natural syntax of Belfast English: (I) Subject-verb agreement (II) Imperative. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 45(2), 107−43.
    Stampe, D. (1979). A dissertation on natural phonology. New York: Garland.
    Tallerman, M. (2005). Understanding syntax (2nd ed.). London: Hodder Arnold.
    Zipf, G.K. (1949). Human behaviour and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. New York: Hafner.