Methods and procedures for a systemic functional linguistic analysis: an investigation into clause complexing relations
List of Authors
  • Sriniwass, Sridevi

Keyword
  • Systemic functional linguistic analysis, clause complexing relations

Abstract
  • This paper outlines a methodology which is consistent with a heuristicgrounded theory- document analysis- qualitative approach (Patton,1990, Creswell, 1994 & Halliday, 1996, Biber et al., 1998) that was employed in a recent cross disciplinary doctoral research. The study was an investigation into the linguistic resources that construct specialised knowledge in chemistry. The theoretical framework of systemic functional linguistics (SFL) outlined by Halliday and Matthiessen (2004 based in turn on Halliday (1994/1985)) was used as the main research tool. The system of taxis and logico semantic relations was demonstrated in relation to three analytical chemistry textbooks used at the undergraduate level in University of Malaya on the subject of chromatography (Rubinson & Rubinson, 1998, Skoog, et al., 2000 and Christian, 2004). The principal markers of taxis and logico-semantic relations were identified according to 57 coding categories remodeled after Halliday & Matthiessen’s (2004) conceptualization of taxis and logico semantic resources in English. The research methodology used in the study was not a set of procedures nor did it follow any hierarchy or priority in the procedures for obtaining linguistic description. Hence, this paper will attempt to show how theory was used maximally to account for linguistic description and provide the foundations for explorations. The mediation of the range of semantic phenomena is through the researcher herself rather than through any inventory, questionnaire or machine, e.g. a parser or coder. Hence, this paper will discuss how theoretical issues such as the coding decisions, interpretation of complex grammatical constructions and association patterns, overlapping categories and other indeterminacies were resolved using a manual, clause by clause analysis. The analysis of data involved the constant comparing of instances of one category with another in an attempt to refine the patterns that emerge. This paper will attempt to demonstrate the research design in a stepwise fashion which reflects the various dimensions to the analysis. Finally, the potential of a heuristic-grounded theorydocument analysis-qualitative approach for encoding experiential meaning is outlined.

Reference
  • Biber, D., Conrad, S. & Repper, Randi. (1998). Corpus linguistics: investigating language structure and use. UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Christian G. (2004). Analytical Chemistry. U.S..: John Wiley & Sons.
    Creswell, John W. (1994). Research design: quantitative and qualitative approaches. U.S: Sage.
    Eggins, S. (2004). Introduction to Systemic Funtional Linguistic. NY: Continuum International Publishing Sop Ltd.
    Halliday, M.A.K. (1961). Categories of the theory of grammar. WORD, 17, 242-292.
    Halliday, M.A.K. & Martin, J.R. (1993). Writing science: literacy and discursive power. London: The Falmer Press.
    Halliday, M.A.K. (1996). On grammar and grammatics. In C. Cloran, D. Butt & R. Hasan (Eds.). Functional descriptions: theory into practice. (p. 1-38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, Christian. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
    Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (2001) Multimodal discourse – the modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
    Lemke, J. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J.R. Martin & Robert Veel (Eds.). Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science. London: Routledge.
    Martin J.R. (1989). Factual writing: exploring and challenging social reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press (first published in 1985 by Deakin University Press).
    Martin, J.R. (1995). Text and clause: Fractal resonance. TEXT, 15, (1), 5-42.
    O’Halloran, Kay L. (2000). Classroom discourse in Mathematics: A multisemiotic analysis. Linguistics and Education, 10, (3), 359-388.
    O’Halloran, Kay L. (2003). Educational implications of Mathematics as a multisemiotic discourse. In M. Anderson, A. Sáenz-Ludlow, S. Zellweger & V. V. Cifarelli. (Eds.) Educational perspectives on Mathematics as semiosis: From thinking to interpreting to knowing. (p.185-214). NY: Legas.
    Patton, Michael Quinn. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research method. US: Sage.
    Pavia, Donald L., Lampman, Gary M., Kriz, George S. & Engel, Randall G. (1999). Introduction to organic laboratory techniques: A microscale approach. U.S.: Saunders College Publishing.
    Rouessac, Francis & Rouessac, Annick. (2000). Chemical analysis: Modern instrumentation methods and techniques. England: John Wiley & Sons.
    Rubinson & Rubinson. (1998). Contemporary chemical analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    Sinclair, John McH. (1992). Trust the text: The implications are daunting. In Martin Davies & Louise Ravelli. (Eds.). Advances in systemic linguistics: recent theory and practice. (p. 5 – 19). London & New York: Pinter Publishers.
    Skoog D.A. et al. (2000). Analytical chemistry: an introduction. US: Saunders College Publishing.
    Sriniwass, Sridevi. (2006a). Knowledge Construction in the Genre of Chemistry Textbooks: A Systemic Functional Perspective. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. University of Malaya.
    Sriniwass, Sridevi. (2006b) Systemic perspectives on the clause complex in English: Logico-semantic relations in chemistry. In Zuraidah Mohd. Don (Ed.). English in a globalised environment: the present day reality in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press. pp. 55-85.
    Sriniwass, Sridevi. (2008). Tactic Augmentation and Circumstantial Augmentation in the Creation of Field Meanings. In Carys Jones and Eija Ventola (eds.) in From Language to Multimodality New Developments in the Study of Ideational Meaning:. EQUINOX Publishing Ltd.: U.K. (Series Functional
    Linguistics edited by Professor Robin Fawcett.).